Women's Voices as Evidence: Personal Testimony is Pro-Choice Films

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-22

  Pickering, Barbara A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859772963     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2003.11821594     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alcoff, L., & Gray, L., (1993). Survivor discourse: Transgression or recuperation? Signs, 18(2) 260–280.
2. Aristotle (trans. 1986). The rhetoric and poetics of Aristotle. (Trans, by W., Rhys Roberts). New York: Modern Library.
3. Baehr, N., (1990). Abortion without apology: A radical history for the 1990s. Boston: South End Press.
4. Bonavoglia, A., (Ed.) (1991). The choices we made. New York: Random House.
5. Branham, R., (1991). The role of the convert in Eclipse of Reason and The Silent Scream. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 407–426.
6. Broda-Bahm, K. T., (Ed.). (2000). Invitational debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 21, 74–115.
7. Bruner, M. L., (1996). Producing identities: Gender problematization and feminist argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32(4) 185–198.
8. Campbell, K. K., (1973). The rhetoric of women's liberation: An oxymoron. (Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 74–86.
9. Campbell, K. K., (1989). Man cannot speak for her, Vol. I: A critical study of early feminist rhetoric. New York: Praeger.
10. Carlson, M., (1989, July 17). The battle over abortion. Time, 62–63.
11. Code, L., (1988). Credibility: A double standard. In L., Code, S., Mullett, & C., Overall (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives (pp. 64–88). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12. Condit, C. M., (1990). Decoding abortion rhetoric: Communicating social change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
13. Contract with America. (1994). Gillespie, E., & Schellhas, B., (Eds.), NY: Random House, Inc.
14. Crenshaw, C., (1993a). Dominant form and marginalized voices: argumentation about feminism(s), CEDA Yearbook, 14, 72–79.
15. Crenshaw, C., (1993b). Pieces of a cultural puzzle: A reply. CEDA Yearbook, 14, 92–95.
16. Crenshaw, C., (1994). Argument borrowing and its obligations. CEDA Yearbook, 15, 76–85.
17. Crenshaw, C., (1996). The normality of man and female otherness: (Re)Producing patriarchal lines of argument in the law and the news. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32(4) 170–184.
18. Cuniberti, B., & Mehren, E., (1985, August 8). Abortion film stirs friend, foe. Los Angeles Times, p. Sec. I: 1+.
19. DuBrow, R., (1990, November 10). TBS to air another abortion rights show. Los Angeles Times, p. F1 +
20. Elshtain, J., (1982). Feminist discourse and its discontents: Language, power, and meaning. Signs, 7, 603–621.
21. Fabj, V., & Sobnosky, M., (1995). AIDS activism and the rejuvenation of the public sphere. Argumentation and Advocacy, 31(A), 163–184.
22. Felman, S., & Laub, D., (1992). Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. New York: Routledge.
23. Foss, K. A., & Foss, S. K., (1994). Personal experience as evidence in feminist scholarship. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 39–43.
24. Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L., (1992). A feminist perspective on rhetorical theory: Toward a classification of boundaries. Western Journal of Communication, 56(4), 330–349.
25. Foss, S., & Griffin, C., (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62, 2–18.
26. Fulkerson, R., (1996). Transcending our conception of argument in light of feminist critiques. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32(4), 199–217.
27. Gilligan, C., (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Goodnight, G. T., (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation, Journal of the American Forensic Association, 18, 214–227.
29. Greenhouse, L., (1989, July 4). Supreme Court, 5–4, narrowing ‘Roe v. Wade,’ upholds sharp state limits on abortion, New York Times, 1.
30. Harding, S., (1983). Whose science? Whose knowledge? In S., Harding & M., Hintikka, Discovering reality. Boston: D. Reidel.
31. Hodgson v. Minnesota, 490 U.S. 417 (1990).
32. hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.
33. Jarman, J., & McDonald, K., (2001). Invitation declined: A response to intercollegiate debate as invitational rhetoric. Arguing communication and culture: Selected papers from the 12th NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Washington, DC: NCA, 205–212.
34. Kauflman, L., (1993). The long goodbye: Against personal testimony, or an infant grifter grows up. In L., Kauffman (Ed.). American feminist thought at century's end: A reader (pp. 258–277). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
35. Kelley, M., (2003, June 5). ‘Partial-birth’ ban approved by House. Omaha World-Herald, A1–2.
36. Lacayo, R., (1989, May 1). Whose life is it? Time, 24.
37. Lake, R., (1986). The metaethical framework of anti-abortion rhetoric. Signs, 77(3), 478–499.
38. Lake, R., & Pickering, B., (1997). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93.
39. MacKinnon, C. A., (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs, 7(3), 515–544.
40. Makau, J., (1992). Revisioning the argumentation course. Women's Studies in Communication, 15, 79–91.
41. Makau, J., & Marty, D., (2001). Cooperative argumentation: A model for deliberative community. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
42. Maxtone-Graham, K., (1973). Pregnant by mistake: The stories of seventeen women. NY: Liverright.
43. Miller, P. G., (1993). The worst of times. NY: Harper Collins.
44. O'Keefe, D., (1977). Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13, 121–128.
45. Palczewski, C. H., (1993). Public policy argument and survivor testimony: Pro-ordinance conservatives, confession, mediation and recuperation. In R., McKerrow (Ed.) Argument and the postmodern challenge: Proceedings of the 8th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 461–467). Annandale, VA: SCA.
46. Palczewski, C. H., (1995). Survivor testimony in the pornography controversy: Assessing credibility in the Minneapolis hearings and the Attorney General's report. In E., Schiappa (Ed.) Warranting assent: Case studies in argument evaluation (pp. 257–281). Albany: State University of New York Press.
47. Palczewski, C. H., (Ed.). (1996). Argumentation and feminisms [Special issue). Argumentation and Advocacy, 32(4) 161–217.
48. Palczewski, C. H., (2001). Argument in an off key: Playing with the productive limits of argument. In G. T., Goodnight (Ed.) Arguing communication and culture: Selected papers from the 12th NCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 1–23). Washington, D.C.: NCA.
49. Petchesky, R., (1987). Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies, 13(2) 263–292.
50. Pfau, M., Thomas, D., & Ulrich, W., (1987). Debate and argument: A systems approach to advocacy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
51. Pickering, B., (1992). The rhetoric of visual images: An analysis of pro-choice/pro-life films. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
52. Pickering, B., (1995). Women as ‘Object’ in the welfare debate: Victims or scapegoats? In S., Jackson (Ed.) Argumentation and values: Proceedings of the ninth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 219–225). Annandale, VA: SCA.
53. Pickering, B., & Lake, R., (2000). Visual images as (opposed to?) reason: The argument of Eclipse of Reason. In T., Hollihan (Ed.) Argument at century's end: Selected papers from the 11th NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 253–261). Annandale, VA: NCA.
54. Railsback, C. C., (1984). The contemporary American abortion controversy: Stages in the argument. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 410–424.
55. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
56. Saad, L., (2003, Jan. 20). Roe v. Wade has positive public image. In Poll analyses: Gallup News Service. Retrieved January 21, 2003 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr030120.asp
57. Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
58. Vance, C., (1990). The pleasure of looking: Essays on contemporary photography. In C., Squiers (Ed.), The critical image (pp. 38–58) Seattle: Bay Press.
59. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989).
60. Goodwin, T., & Wurzburg, T., (Producer and director), Hatgan, R (Associate producer). (1985). Personal Decisions. [Videocassette]. United States: Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
61. Nathanson, B., & Smith, D.S., (Producers), Dabner, J., (Director). (1985). The Silent Scream. [Videocassette]. United States: American Portrait Films.
62. Smeal, E., & Yorkin, P., (Producers). (1990). Abortion Denied: Shattering Young Women's Lives. [Videocassette]. United States: The Fund for Feminist Majority.
63. Warren, C., (Producer), Nathanson, B., (Executive producer), & Nathanson, A., (Associate producer). (1987). Eclipse of Reason. [Videocassette], United States: Bernadell Productions.