Argumentation and Feminisms: An Introduction

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 161-169

  Palczewski, Catherine Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958087547     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1996.11977992     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abrams, Kathryn. “Hearing the Call of Stories.” California Law Review 79 (1991): 971–1052.
2. Alcoff, Linda, and Laura, Gray. “Survivor Discourse: Transgression or Recuperation?” Signs 18 (1993): 260–90.
3. Alcoff, Linda, and Elizabeth, Potter. Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge, 1993.
4. Allen, Julia M., and Lester, Faigley. “Discursive Strategies for Social Change: An Alternative Rhetoric of Argument.” Rhetoric Review 14 (1995): 142–72.
5. Altman, Karen. “Rhetorics of Difference in Feminist Argument.” Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Bruce E., Gronbeck. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1989. 346–53.
6. Anthony, Louise, and Charlotte, Witt. A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.
7. Ayim, Maryann. “Violence and Domination as Metaphors in Academic Discourse.” Selected Issues in Logic and Communication. Ed. Trudy, Govier. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1988. 184–95.
8. Ayim, Maryann. “Passing Through the Needle's Eye: Can a Feminist Teach Logic?” Argumentation 9 (1995): 801–20.
9. Ayim, Maryann. “Dominance and Affiliation: Paradigms in Conflict.” Informal Logic 13 (1991): 79–88.
10. Biesecker, Barbara. “Coming to Terms with Recent Attempts to Write Women into the History of Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 25 (1992): 140–61.
11. Biesecker, Barbara. “Negotiating with Our Tradition: Reflecting Again (Without Apologies) on the Feminization of Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (1993): 236–41.
12. Blankenship, Jane, and Deborah C., Robson. “A ‘Feminine Style’ in Women's Political Discourse: An Exploratory Essay.” Communication Quarterly 43 (1995): 353–66.
13. Brockriede, Wayne. “Where is Argument?” Perspectives on Argumentation. Ed. Robert, Trapp and Janice, Schuetz. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1990. 4–8.
14. Brownlee, Don, and Ian, Fielding. “Gender and Media Models in the Development of Argument.” Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Donn W., Parson. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1991. 154–8.
15. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. “Biesecker Cannot Speak for Her Either.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (1993): 153–9.
16. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. Man Cannot Speak for Her: A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. Vol. 1. New York: Praeger, 1989.
17. Code, Lorraine. “Credibility: A Double Standard.” Feminist Perspectives. Ed. Lorraine, Code, Sheila, Mullett, and Christine, Overall. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. 64–88.
18. Code, Lorraine. “Responsibility and Rhetoric.” Hypatia 9 (1994): 1–19.
19. Code, Lorraine. Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. London: Routledge, 1995.
20. Code, Lorraine. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
21. Code, Lorraine, Sheila, Mullett and Christine, Overall, eds. Feminist Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988.
22. Elshtain, Jean Bethke. “Feminism Discourse and Its Discontents: Language, Power, and Meaning.” Signs 7 (Spring 1982): 603–21.
23. Foss, Karen A., and Sonja K., Foss. Women Speak: The Eloguence of Women's Lives. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1991.
24. Foss, Sonja K., Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1989.
25. Foss, Sonja, and Cindy, Griffin. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.” Communication Monographs 62 (1995): 2–18.
26. Gearhart, Sally Miller. “The Womanization of Rhetoric.” Women's Studies International Quarterly 2 (1979): 195–201.
27. Gilbert, Michael A., “Feminism, Argumentation and Coalescence.” Informal Logic 16 (1994): 95–113.
28. Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
29. Govier, Trudy. A Practical Study of Argument. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1992.
30. Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Vol. I. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
31. Hanen, Marsha P., “Feminism, Objectivity, and Legal Truth.” Feminist Perspectives. Ed. Lorraine, Code, Sheila, Mullett, and Christine, Overall. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. 29–45.
32. Harding, Sandra, and Merrill B., Hintikka, eds. Discovering Reality. Boston: D. Reidel, 1983.
33. Hinderer, Drew E., Building Arguments. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1992.
34. Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life, 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1992
35. Kauffman, Linda S., “The Long Goodbye: Against Personal Testimony, or An Infant Grifter Grows Up.” American Feminist Thought at Century's End. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1993. 258–77.
36. Keehner, Mary. “The Discourse of M/Otherhood and Johnson Controls: The Debate over Fetal ‘Versus’ Women's Rights.” Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Donn W., Parson. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1991. 128–34.
37. Lakoff, George, and Mark, Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
38. MacKinnon, Catharine A., “Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: An Agenda for Theory.” Signs 7 (Spring 1982): 515–44.
39. Makau, Josina. Reasoning and Communication: Thinking Critically About Arguments. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1990.
40. Makau, Josina. “Revisioning the Argumentation Course.” Women's Studies in Communication 15 (1992): 79–91.
41. Mansbridge, Jane. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
42. Menssen, Sandra. “Do Women and Men Use Different Logics? A Reply to Carol Gilligan and Deborah Orr.” Informal Logic 15 (1993): 123–38.
43. Montini, Theresa. “Gender and Emotion in the Advocacy for Breast Cancer Informed Consent Legislation.” Gender and Society 10.2 (1996): 9–23.
44. Moulton, Janice. “A Paradigm of Philosophy: The Adversary Method.” Discovering Reality. Ed. Sandra, Harding and Merrill B., Hintikka. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1983. 149–64.
45. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. “A Question of Evidence.” Hypatia 8(1993): 172–89.
46. Nye, Andrea. Words of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic. New York: Routledge, 1990.
47. O'Keefe, Daniel J., “The Concepts of Argument and Arguing.” Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research. Ed. J., Robert Cox and Charles, Arthur Willard. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982. 3–23.
48. Orr, Deborah. “Just the Facts Ma'am: Informal Logic, Gender, and Pedagogy.” Informal Logic 11 (1989): 1–10.
49. Pearce, Kimber Charles, and Elizabeth J., Natalie. “Deconstructing Gender Differences in Persuasibility: A Bricolage.” Women's Studies in Communication 16 (1993): 55–71.
50. Palczewski, Catherine Helen. “Survivor Testimony in the Pornography Controversy: Assessing Credibility in Argument from Example in the Attorney General's Report.” Warranting Assent: Case Studies in Argument Evaluation. Ed. Edward, Schiappa. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995. 257–81.
51. Palczewski, Catherine Helen. “Public Policy Argument and Survivor Testimony: Pro-Ordinance Conservatives, Confession, Mediation, and Recuperation.” Argument and the Postmodern Challenge: Proceedings of the Eighth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Raymie E., McKerrow. Annan-dale, VA: SCA, November 1993. 461–7.
52. Palczewski, Catherine Helen. “Civil Religion and Public Argument: Reagan as Public Priest of the Antiabortion Movement.” Reagan and Public Discourse in America. Ed. Michael, Weiler and W., Barnett Pearce. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1992. 266–84.
53. Penelope, Julia. Speaking Freely: Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers' Tongues. New York: Pergamon, 1990.
54. Rancer, Andrew S., and Robert A., Baukus. “Discriminating Males and Females on Belief Structures about Arguing.” Advances in Gender and Communication Research. Ed. Lawrence B., Nadler, Marjorie, Keeshan Nadler, and William R., Todd-Mancilas. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987. 155–73.
55. Rowland, Robert C., “On Defining Argument.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (1987): 140–59.
56. Showalter, Elaine, ed. The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature, and Theory. New York: Pantheon, 1985.
57. Solomon, Martha. “Contesting the Rules of Discourse: A Case Study of Women's Ascent to Public Advocacy.” Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Donn W., Parson. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1991. 23–6.
58. Thale, Mary. “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780.” Gender and History 7 (April 1995): 5–24.
59. Toulmin, Stephen, Richard, Rieke, and Allan, Janik. An Introduction to Reasoning, 2nd ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1984.
60. Trapp, Robert, and Janice, Schuetz, eds. Perspectives on Argumentation. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1990.
61. Verbiest, Agnes. “Woman and the Gift of Reason.” Argumentation 9 (1995): 821–36.
62. Von Morstein, Petra. “A Message from Cassandra-Experience and Knowledge: Dichotomy and Unity.” Feminist Perspectives. Ed. Lorraine, Code, Sheila, Mullett, and Christine, Overall. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. 46–63.
63. Warren, Helen B., “Charlotte Perkins Gilman's ‘Game of Honest Argument’: Playing Out the Differences.” Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Bruce E., Gronbeck. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1989. 354–60.
64. Warren, Helen B. “‘The Truth Lies Somewhere Between the Two’: Feminist Formulations on Critical Theory and Practice.” Argument and Critical Practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Joseph W., Wenzel. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1987. 103–12.
65. Warren, Karen J., “Critical Thinking and Feminism.” Informal Logic 10 (1988): 31–44.
66. Wenzel, Joseph W., “Three Perspectives on Argument: Rhetoric, Dialectic, Logic.” Perspectives on Argumentation. Ed. Robert, Trapp and Janice, Schuetz. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1990. 9–26.
67. Whitford, Margaret, and Kathleen, Lennon, eds. Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. New York: Routledge, 1994.
68. Williams, Delores S., “Womanist/Feminist Dialogue: Problems and Possibilities.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 9 (1993): 67–73.
69. Zarefsky, David. “Future Directions in Argumentation Theory and Practice.” Perspectives on Argumentation. Ed. Robert, Trapp and Janice, Schuetz. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1990. 287–97.