Scenario Prediction and Analysis of Urban Growth Using SLEUTH Model

Pedosphere

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 206-216

  Feng, Hui Hui ^a   Liu, Hui Ping ^a   Lü, Ying ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Central urban area; Land protection; Land resources; Spatial metrics; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

GROWTH MODELING; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; PREDICTION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA; DONGGUAN; GUANGDONG; ZHUJIANG DELTA;

EID: 84859761489     PISSN: 10020160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60007-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aguilera F., Valenzuela L.M., Botequilha-Leitao A. Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape Urban Plan. 2011, 99:226-238.
2. Alberti M. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int. Regional Sci. Rev. 2005, 28:168-192.
3. Arthur-Hartranft S.T., Carlson T.N., Clarke K.C. Satellite and ground-based microclimate and hydrologic analyses coupled with a regional urban growth model. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86:385-400.
4. Bao C., Fang C.L. Water resources constraint force on urbanization in water deficient regions: A case study of the Hexi Corridor, arid area of NW China. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 62:508-517.
5. Barredo J.I., Kasanko M., McCormick N., Lavalle C. Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape Urban Plan. 2003, 64:145-160.
6. Carlson T.N. Analysis and prediction of surface runoff in an urbanizing watershed using satellite imagery. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 2004, 40:1087-1098.
7. CAUPD, DCPB The Urban Master Planning of Dongguan from the Year 2000 to 2015 (in Chinese) 2001, Dongguan City Planning Bureau, Dongguan.
8. Chang G.H., Brada J.C. The paradox of China's growing under urbanization. Econ. Syst. 2006, 30:24-40.
9. Chen J. Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security. Catena. 2007, 69:1-15.
10. Chen Y., Zhou Y. Scaling laws and indications of self-organized criticality in urban systems. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2008, 35:85-98.
11. Clarke K.C., Gaydos L.J. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int. J. Geogr. Sci. 1998, 12:699-714.
12. Clarke K.C. A decade of cellular urban modeling with SLEUTH: Unresolved issues and problems. Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions 2008, 47-60. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge. R.K. Brail (Ed.).
13. Clarke K.C. Mapping and Modelling Land Use Change: An application of the SLEUTH Model in Landscape Analysis and Visualisation. Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning 2008, Springer, Berlin.
14. Clarke K.C., Gazulis N., Dietzel C.N., Goldstein N.C. A Decade of SLEUTHing: Lessons Learned from Applications of a Cellular Automaton Land Use Change Model. Classics from IJGIS. Twenty Years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Systems and Science 2007, 413-425. Taylor and Francis, CRC, Boca Raton. P. Fisher (Ed.).
15. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ. Planning B: Planning Design. 1997, 24:247-261.
16. Cohen B. Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technol. Soc. 2006, 28:63-80.
17. Deng J.S., Wang K., Hong Y., Qi J.G. Spatiotemporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanization. Landscape Urban Plan. 2009, 92:187-198.
18. Dietzel C., Clarke K. The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2006, 30:78-101.
19. Dietzel C., Clarke K.C. Toward optimal calibration of the SLEUTH land use change model. Trans. GIS. 2007, 11:29-45.
20. He C., Okada N., Zhang Q., Shi P., Zhang J. Modeling urban expansion scenarios by coupling cellular automata model and system dynamic model in Beijing, China. Appl. Geogr. 2006, 26:323-345.
21. Herold M., Couclelis H., Clarke K.C. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2005, 29:369-399.
22. Herold M., Goldstein N.C., Clarke K.C. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86:286-302.
23. Ji W., Ma J., Twibell R.W., Underhill K. Characterizing urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2006, 30:861-879.
24. Lambin E.F., Meyfroidt P. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy. 2010, 27:108-118.
25. Li X., Yeh A.G.O. Analyzing spatial restructuring of land use patterns in a fast growing region using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape Urban Plan. 2004, 69:335-354.
26. Liu Y., Kuang Y., Wu Z., Huang N., Zhou J. Impact of land use on urban land surface temperature-A case study of Dongguan, Guangdong Province. Sci. Geol. Sin. 2006, 26:597-602. (in Chinese).
27. Long H., Tang G., Li X., Gerhard K. Socioeconomic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan, the Yangtze River Delta economic area of China. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 83:351-364.
28. Luo G., Yin C., Chen X., Xu W., Lu L. Combining system dynamic model and CLUE-S model to improve land use scenario analyses at regional scale: A case study of Sangong watershed in Xinjiang, China. Ecol. Complexity. 2010, 7:198-207.
29. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., Ene E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps (verified on November 14, 2011). http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
30. Menard A., Marceau D.J. Simulating the impact of forest management scenarios in an agricultural landscape of southern Quebec, Canada, using a geographic cellular automata. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007, 79:253-265.
31. Petrov L.O., Lavalle C., Kasanko M. Urban land use scenarios for a tourist region in Europe: Applying the MOLAND model to Algarve, Portugal. Landscape Urban Plan. 2009, 92:10-23.
32. Rafiee R., Mahiny A.S., Khorasani N., Darvishsefat A.A., Danekar A. Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM). Cities. 2009, 26:19-26.
33. Rounsevell M.D.A., Ewert F., Reginster I., Leemans R., Carter T.R. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: II. Projecting changes in cropland and grassland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 107:117-135.
34. Roy M. Planning for sustainable urbanisation in fast growing cities: Mitigation and adaptation issues addressed in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Habitat Int. 2009, 33:276-286.
35. Seto K.C., Kaufmann R.K. Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Land Econ. 2003, 79:106-121.
36. Shen L., Cheng S., Gunson A.J., Wan H. Urbanization, sustainability and the utilization of energy and mineral resources in China. Cities. 2005, 22:287-302.
37. Silva E.A., Clarke K.C. Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2002, 26:525-552.
38. Solecki W.D., Oliveri C. Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land use change model. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 72:105-115.
39. Solon J. Spatial context of urbanization: Landscape pattern and changes between 1950 and 1990 in the Warsaw metropolitan area, Poland. Landscape Urban Plan. 2009, 93:250-261.
40. Tan M., Li X., Xie H., Lu C. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy. 2005, 22:187-196.
41. USGS Project gigalopolis: Urban and land cover modeling (verified on October 18, 2011). http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/.
42. Verburg P.H., Schot P.P., Dijst M.J., Veldkamp A. Land use change modelling-current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 2004, 61:309-324.
43. Verburg P.H., Schulp C.J.E., Witte N., Veldkamp A. Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114:39-56.
44. Weng Y.C. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007, 81:341-353.
45. Wu J., Jenerette G.D., Buyantuyev A., Redman C.L. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: The case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecol. Complexity. 2011, 8:1-8.
46. Xian G., Crane M., Steinwand D. Dynamic modeling of Tampa Bay urban development using parallel computing. Comput. Geosci. 2005, 31:920-928.
47. Xu X., Zhou Y., Ning Y. Urban Geography (in Chinese) 2009, Advanced Education Press, Beijing.
48. Zhang K.H., Song S. Rural-urban migration and urbanization in China: Evidence from time-series and cross-section analyses. China Econ. Rev. 2003, 14:386-400.
49. Zhang L. Conceptualizing China's urbanization under reforms. Habitat Int. 2008, 32:452-470.
50. Zhou Q., Li B., Kurban A. Spatial pattern analysis of land cover change trajectories in Tarm Basin, northwest China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29:5495-5509.