Analysis and prediction of surface runoff in an urbanizing watershed using satellite imagery

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1087-1098

  Carlson, Toby N ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use planning; Remote sensing; Storm water management; Surface water hydrology; Urban sprawl; Water use planning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RUNOFF; SATELLITES; WATERSHEDS;

SURFACE RUNOFF; URBAN GROWTH MODELS; URBANIZING WATERSHEDS; WOODLAND;

WATER QUALITY;

LAND USE PLANNING; REMOTE SENSING; RUNOFF; STORMWATER; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 4544296897     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01069.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Agresti, A., 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 558 pp.
2. Anderson, J.R., E.E. Hardy, I.T. Roach, and R.E. Witmer, 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System For Use With Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 28 pp.
3. Arnold, C.L. and C.J Gibbons, 1996. Impervious Surface Coverage: The Emergence of a Key Environmental Indicator. J. American Planning Assn. 62:243-258.
4. Arthur, S. T., 2001. A Satellite Based Scheme for Predicting the Effects of Land Cover Change on Local Microclimate and Surface Hydrology: Development of an Operational Regional Planning Tool. PhD. Thesis, Dept. of Meteorology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 148 pp.
5. Arthur, S.T., T.N. Carlson, and K.C, Clarke, 2003. Satellite and Ground-Based Microclimate and Hydrologic Analyses Coupled With a Regional Urban Growth Model. Remote Sensing of Environment Volume 86:385-400.
6. Arthur, S.T., T.N. Carlson, and D.A.J. Ripley, 2000. Land Use Dynamics of Chester County, Pennsylvania, From a Satellite Remote Sensing Perspective. Geocarto International 15:25-36.
7. Bedient, P.B. and W.C. Huber, 1992. Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis (Second Edition). Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts, 692 pp.
8. Boyd, M.J., M.C. Bufill, and R.M. Knee, 1994. Predicting Pervious and Impervious Storm Runoff From Drainage Basins. Hydrological Sciences Journal 39:321-332.
9. Carlson, T.N. and S.T. Arthur, 2000. The Impact of Land Use-Land Cover Changes Due to Urbanization on Surface Microclimate and Hydrology: A Satellite Perspective. Global and Planetary Change 25:49-65.
10. Chow, V.T, D.R. Maidment, and L.W. Mays, 1988. Applied Hydrology, McGrow-Hill Book Company, New York, New York, 572 pp.
11. Clarke, K.C. and L. Gaydos, 1998. Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Growth Predictions for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int. J. Geographical Information Science 12:669-714.
12. Congalton, R.G., 1991. A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sens. Environ. 37:35-46.
13. Dow, C.L. and D.R. DeWalle, 2000. Trends in Evaporation and Bowen Ratio on Urbanizing Watersheds in Eastern United States. Water Resources Research 36:1835-1843.
14. Gillies, R.R. and T.N. Carlson, 1995. Thermal Remote Sensing of Surface Soil Water Content With Partial Vegetation Cover for Incorporation Into Climate Models. J. Appl. Meteor. 34:745-756.
15. Hebble, E.E., T.N. Carlson, and K. Daniel, 2001. Impervious Surface Area and Residential Housing Density: A Satellite Perspective. Geocarto International 16:13-18.
16. PASDA (Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access), 2003. Access data, Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access. Available at http://www. pasda.psu.edu/access/ Acsessed in June 2004.
17. Pilgrim, David H. and Ian Cordery, 1993. Section 9.24. In: Handbook of Hydrology, D. R. Maidment (Editor). McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York.
18. Ridd, M.C., 1995. Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) Model for Urban Ecosystems Analysis Through Remote Sensing: Comparative Anatomy for Cities. Int. J. Remote Sens. 12:2165-2185.
19. Schueler, T., 1994. The Importance of Imperviousness. Watershed Prediction Technologies 3:100-111.
20. Sheeder, S.A, T.N. Carlson, and J.D. Ross, 2002. Dual Urban and Rural Hydrograph Signals in Three Small Watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources (JAWRA) 38:1027-1040.
21. Stankowski, S.J., 1972. Population Density as an Indirect Indicator of Urban and Suburban Land-Surface Modifications. Geological Survey Research 8006:225-235.
22. Sutton. P.G., 2003. A Scale-Adjusted Measure of 'Urban Sprawl' Using Nighttime Satellite Imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 86:353-369.
23. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), 2003. Gigalopolis: SLEUTH Download. Available at http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/v2/ Dnload/download.htm. Accessed in June 2004. DISCUSSION 1