Applying catastrophe theory to an information-processing model of problem solving in science education

Science Education

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 392-410

  Stamovlasis, Dimitrios ^a   Tsaparlis, Georgios ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859754049     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21002     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Arnold, V. I. (1986). Catastrophe theory. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
2. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
5. Baker, J. S., & Frey, P. W. (1980). A cusp catastrophe: Hysteresis, bimodality, and inaccessibility in rabbit eyelid conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 10, 520-535.
6. Basolo, F. (1984). Teaching of chemical reactions and syntheses. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 520-521.
7. Bodner, G. M. (2003). Problem solving: The difference between what we do and what we tell students to do (Nyholm Award Lecture sponsored by the Royal Society of Chemistry). University Chemistry Education, 7, 37-45.
8. Bodner, G. M., & Herron, J. D. (2002). Problem solving in chemistry. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 235-266). Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
9. Bodner, G. M., & McMillen, T. L. B. (1986). Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 727-73.
10. Bodner, G. M., & Pribyl, J. R. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 229-240.
11. Boles, S. (1990). A model of routine and creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 230-245.
12. Bourne, L. E., Dominowski, R. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Human information processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Bowen, C. W. (1990). Representational systems used by graduate students while problem solving in organic synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 351-370.
14. Bowen, C. W., & Bodner, G. M. (1991). Problem-solving processes used by graduate students while solving tasks in organic synthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 143-158.
15. Cartrette, D. P., & Bodner, G. M. (2010). Non-mathematical problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 643-660.
16. Castrigiano, D. P. L., & Hayes, S. A. (2004). Catastrophe theory. Boulder, CO: Addison-Wesley.
17. Chow, J. Y., Davis, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2006). The nonlinear pedagogy: Emergence of game play and movement skills. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Science, 10, 71-103.
18. Cobb, L., & Zacks, S. (1985). Applications of catastrophe theory for statistical modeling in the biosciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(32), 793-802.
19. Dempster, F. N. (1991). Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 157-173.
20. Furió, C., Calatayud, M. L., Bárcenas, S. L., & Padilla, O. M. (2000). Functional fixedness and functional reduction as common sense reasoning in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules. Science Education, 84, 545-565.
21. Gilmore, R. (1981). Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers. New York: Wiley.
22. Grove, N. P., & Bretz, N. P. (2010). Perry's scheme of intellectual and epistemological development as a framework for describing student difficulties in learning organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 207-211.
23. Guastello, S. J. (1982). Moderator regression and the cusp catastrophe: Application of two-stage personnel selection, training, therapy, and program evaluation. Behavioral Science, 27, 259-272.
24. Guastello, S. J. (1987). A butterfly catastrophe model of motivation in organization: Academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 165-182.
25. Guastello, S. J. (2001). Nonlinear dynamics in psychology. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 6, 11-19.
26. Guastello, S. J. (2002). Managing emergent phenomena: Nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Guastello, S. J. (2009). Group dynamics: Adaptation, coordination and the emergence of leaders. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.). Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamics systems (pp. 402-427). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Guastello, S. J. (2011). Discontinuities and catastrophes with polynomial regression. In S. Guastello & R. Gregson (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics systems analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data (pp. 252-180). New York: CRC Press.
29. Johnstone, A. H. (1984). New stars for the teacher to steer by? Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 847-849.
30. Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Naeme, F. F. (1991). Room for scientific thought? International Journal of Science Education, 13, 187-192.
31. Johnstone, A. H., & El-Banna, H. (1986). Capacities, demands and processes-A predictive model for science education. Education in Chemistry, 23, 80-84.
32. Johnstone, A. H., Hogg, W.R., & Ziane, M. (1993). A working memory model applied to physics problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 663-672.
33. Jonassen, D. H., (2003). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34. Larkin, J., & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 191-203.
35. Lawson, A. E. (1978). Development and validation of the classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 11-24.
36. Lawson, A. E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 569-617.
37. Lawson, A. E. (1993). Classroom test of scientific reasoning: Revised paper-pencil edition. Tempe: Arizona State University.
38. Molenaar, P. C., & Oppenheimer, L. (1985). Dynamic models of development and the mechanistic-organismic controversy. New Ideas in Psychology, 3, 233-242.
39. Niaz, M. (1988a). The information processing demand of chemistry problems and its relation to Pascual-Leone's functional M-capacity. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 231-238.
40. Niaz, M. (1988b). Manipulation of M-demand of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance: A neo-Piagetian study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 643-657.
41. Niaz, M. (1989). Relation between Pascual-Leone's structural and functional M-space and its effect on problem solving in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 93-99.
42. Niaz, M. (1995). Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: A Lakatosian interpretation. Science Education, 79, 19-36.
43. Niaz, M., de Nunez, S. G., & de Pineda, R. I. (2000). Academic performance of high school students as a function of mental capacity, cognitive style, mobility-fixity dimension, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 18-29.
44. Niaz, M., & Logie, R. H. (1993). Working memory, mental capacity and science education: Towards an understanding of the "working memory overload hypothesis". Oxford Review of Education, 19, 511-525.
45. Niaz, M., & Robinson, W. R. (1992). Manipulation of logical structure of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 211-226.
46. Nicolis, G., & Nicolis, C. (2007). Foundations of complex systems. Singapore: World Scientific.
47. Nicolis, S. J. (1986). Chaotic dynamics as applied to information processing. Reports on Progress in Physics, 49, 1109-1187.
48. Opdenacker, C., Fierens, H., Brabant, I. V., Spruyt, J., Slootmaekers, P. J., & Johnstone, A. H. (1990). Academic performance in solving chemistry problems related to student working memory capacity. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 177-185.
49. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345.
50. Pascual-Leone, J. (1974). A neo-Piagetian process-structural model of Witkin's psychological differentiation. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
51. Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin's field dependence-independence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 36-70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
52. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Poston, T., & Stewart, I. (1978). Catastrophe theory and its applications. New York: Dover.
54. Raker, J., & Towns, M.H. (2010). Benchmarking problems used in second year level organic chemistry instruction. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 25-32.
55. Reif, F. (1981). Teaching problem solving-A scientific approach. The Physics Teacher, 19, 329-363.
56. Rosser, J. B. (2000). From catastrophe to chaos: A general theory of economic discontinuities. Boston: Kluwer.
57. Scandarmalia, M. (1977). Information processing capacity and the problem of horizontal decalage: A demonstration using combinatorial reasoning task. Child Psychology, 48, 301-345.
58. Stamovlasis, D. (2005). Nonlinearity, thresholds and bifurcations in knowledge acquisition and problem solving: Towards a paradigm shift in educational research. In A. Russell, T. Honkela, K. Lagus, & M. Polla (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International and Interdisciplinary Symposium of Adaptive Models of Knowledge, Language and Cognition (pp. 17-26). Espoo, Finland: Otamedia Oy.
59. Stamovlasis, D. (2006). The nonlinear dynamical hypothesis in science education problem solving: A catastrophe theory approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Science, 10, 37-70.
60. Stamovlasis, D. (2008). A catastrophe theory model for the working-memory overload hypothesis-Methodological issues. In T. Honkela, M. Polla, M. Paukeri, & O. Simula (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International and Interdisciplinary Symposium on Adaptive Knowledge, Representation and Reasoning (pp. 73-80). Porvoo, Finland: Multiprint Espoo.
61. Stamovlasis, D. (2010). Methodological and epistemological issues on linear regression applied to psychometric variables in problem solving: Rethinking variance. Chemistry Education, Research and Practice, 11, 59-68.
62. Stamovlasis, D. (2011). Nonlinear dynamics and neo-Piagetian theories in problem solving: Perspectives on a new Epistemology and Theory Development. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Science, 15, 145-173.
63. Stamovlasis, D., & Tsaparlis, G. (2001). Application of complexity theory to an information-processing model in science education. Nonlinear Dynamics in Psychology and Life Sciences, 5, 267-286.
64. Stamovlasis, D., & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). Nonlinear analysis of the effect of working memory capacity on student performance in problem solving. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge based society (pp. 183-190). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
65. Stamovlasis, D., & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Cognitive variables in problem solving: A nonlinear approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 7-32.
66. Thom, R. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis. New York: Benjamin Addison-Wesley.
67. Tsaparlis, G. (1998). Dimensional analysis and predictive models in problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 335-350.
68. Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Non-algorithmic quantitative problem solving in university physical chemistry: A correlation study of the role of selective cognitive factors. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 125-148.
69. Tsaparlis, G., & Angelopoulos, V. (2000). A model of problem solving: Its operation, validity and usefulness in the case of organic-synthesis problems. Science Education, 84, 131-153.
70. Tsaparlis, G., Kousathana, M., & Niaz, M. (1998). Molecular-equilibrium problems: Manipulation of logical structure and of M-demand, and their effect on student performance. Science Education, 82, 437-454.
71. Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molennar, P. C. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 3, 395-417.
72. Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler adult intelligence scale manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
73. Witkin, H. A. (1978). Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
74. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
75. Zeeman, E. C. (1977). Catastrophe theory: Selected papers (1972-1977). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
76. Zoller, U. (1993). Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 195-197.
77. Zoller, U., & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27, 117-130.