Systematic mistakes are likely in bounded optimal decision-making systems

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 410-423

  Livnat, Adi ^a   Pippenger, Nicholas ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral ecology; Bounded rationality; Computational complexity; Decision making; Heuristics and biases; Rules of thumb

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; HEURISTICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MODELING; NATURAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NATURAL SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 38049060334     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.044     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ainslie G.W. Impulse control in pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 21 (1974) 485-489
2. Ainslie G.W. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol. Bull. 82 (1975) 463-496
3. Anderson J.H., and Gouda M.G. A new explanation of the glitch phenomenon. Acta Inf. 28 (1991) 297-309
4. Arrow K.J. A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J. Polit. Econ. 58 4 (1950) 328-346
5. Bar-Hillel M., and Margalit A. How vicious are cycles of intransitive choice?. Theory and Decision 24 (1988) 119-145
6. Barkow J., Cosmides L., and Tooby J. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (1992), Oxford University Press, NY
7. Bateson M. Context-dependent foraging choices in risk-sensitive starlings. Anim. Behav. 64 (2002) 251-260
8. Bateson M., Healy S.D., and Hurly T.A. Irrational choices in hummingbird foraging behaviour. Anim. Behav. 63 (2001) 587-596
9. Bateson M., Healy S.D., and Hurly T.A. Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 270 (2003) 1271-1276
10. Battalio R.C., Kagel J.H., and MacDonald D.N. Animals' choices over uncertain outcomes: some initial experimental results. Am. Econ. Rev. 75 4 (1985) 597-613
11. Bullock S., and Todd P.M. Made to measure: ecological rationality in structured environments. Minds Mach. 9 (1999) 497-541
12. Caryl, P.G., 1985. Ambivalence. A Dictionary of Birds. Buteo Books, Vermillion, SD, pp. 13-14.
13. Chernoff H. A measure of the asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 23 (1952) 493-509
14. Conlisk J. Why bounded rationality?. J. Econ. Lit. 34 (1996) 669-700
15. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., 1987. From evolution to behavior: evolutionary psychology as the missing link, The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 277-306.
16. Craig C.L., and Bernard G.D. Insect attraction to ultraviolet-reflecting spider webs and web decorations. Ecology 71 (1990) 616-623
17. Cuthill I.C., Stevens M., Sheppard J., Maddocks T., Párraga C.A., and Troscianko T.S. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434 (2005) 72-74
18. Deluty M.Z. Self-control and impulsiveness involving aversive events. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Processes 4 (1978) 250-266
19. Deluty M.Z., Whitehouse W.G., Mellitz M., and Hineline P.N. Self-control and commitment involving aversive events. Behav. Anal. Lett. 3 (1983) 213-219
20. De Palma A., Myers G.M., and Papageorgious Y.Y. Rational choice under imperfect ability to choose. Am. Econ. Rev. 84 (1994) 419-440
21. Doyle J.R., O'Connor D.J., Reynolds G.M., and Bottomley P.M. The robustness of asymmetrically dominated effect: buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases. Psychol. Mark. 16 (1999) 225-243
22. Elster J. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (1979), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Forster J., Higgins E.T., and Bianco A.T. Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?. Organizational Behav. Human Decision Processes 90 (2003) 148-164
24. Franks N.R., Mallon E.B., Bray H.E., Hamilton M.J., and Mischler T.C. Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim. Behav. 65 (2003) 215-223
25. Gigerenzer G., and Todd P.M. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
26. Gould S.J., and Lewontin R.C. The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 205 (1979) 581-598
27. Hirshleifer J., and Riley J.G. The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Horvitz, E.J., 1989. Reasoning about beliefs and actions under computational resource constraints. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. vol. 3. Elsevier, New York, pp. 301-324.
29. Houston A.I. Natural selection and context-dependent values. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 264 (1997) 1539-1541
30. Houston A.I., Kacelnik A., and McNamara J. Functional Ontogeny (1982), Pitman, Boston
31. Huber J., and Puto C. Market boundaries and product choice: illustrating attraction and substitution effects. J. Consum. Res. 10 (1983) 31-44
32. Huber J., Payne J.W., and Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consum. Res. 9 (1982) 90-98
33. Hurly T.A., and Oseen M.D. Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds. Anim. Behav. 58 (1999) 59-66
34. Hutchinson J.M.C., and Gigerenzer G. Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behav. Processes 69 (2005) 97-124
35. Jolls C., Sunstein C.R., and Thaler R. A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Rev. 50 (1998) 1471-1550
36. Kacelnik A. Meanings of rationality. Rational Animals? (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Kagel J.H., MacDonald D.N., and Battalio R.C. Tests of "fanning out" of indifference curves: results from animal and human experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 80 4 (1990) 912-921
38. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 (2003) 1449-1475
39. Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
40. Krichevskiǐ R.E. Realization of functions by superpositions. Probl. Cybern. 2 (1959) 458-477
41. Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112 (1997) 443-477
42. Laland K.N., and Brown G.R. Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Livnat A., and Pippenger N. An optimal brain can be composed of conflicting agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 103 (2006) 3198-3202
44. Loewenstein G., and Thaler R.H. Anomalies: intertemporal choice. J. Econ. Perspect. 3 (1989) 181-193
45. Lupanov O.B. Ob odnom metode sinteza skhem. Izv. VUZ (Radiofizika) 1 (1958) 120-140
46. Lupanov O.B. Complexity of formula realization of functions of logical algebra. Probl. Cybern. 3 (1960) 782-811
47. Machina M.J. Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. Econ. Lit. 27 (1989) 1622-1668
48. Messenger J.B. The visual attack of the cuttlefish. Anim. Behav. 16 (1968) 342-357
49. Mischel W., Ebbesen E.B., and Zeiss A.R. Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21 (1972) 204-218
50. Mischel W., Shoda Y., and Rodriguez M. Delay of gratification in children. Science 244 (1989) 933-938
51. Navarick D.J., and Fantino E. Transitivity as a property of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 18 (1972) 389-401
52. Oxford G.S., and Gillespie R.G. Evolution and ecology of spider coloration. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 43 (1998) 619-643
53. Papadimitriou C.H. Computational Complexity (1993), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
54. Pippenger N. Information theory and the complexity of Boolean functions. Math. Syst. Theory 10 (1977) 129-167
55. Rachlin H., and Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 17 (1972) 15-22
56. Raveret Richter M., and Waddington K.D. Past foraging experience influences honey bee dance behaviour. Anim. Behav. 46 (1993) 123-128
57. Real L.A. Information processing and the evolutionary ecology of cognitive architecture. Am. Nat. 140 (1992) s108-s145
58. Redd W.H., Sidman M., and Fletcher F.G. Time out as a reinforcer for errors in a serial position task. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 21 (1974) 3-17
59. Rubinstein A. Modeling Bounded Rationality (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
60. Russell S. Rationality and intelligence. Artif. Intell. 94 (1997) 57-77
61. Schelling T.C. Self command in practice, in policy, and in a theory of rational choice. Am. Econ. Rev. 74 (1984) 1-11
62. Schuck-Paim C., Pompilio L., and Kacelnick A. State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice. Public Libr. Sci. Biol. 2 12 (2004) 2305-2315
63. Sedikides C., Ariely D., and Olsen N. Contextual and procedural determinants of partner selection: of asymmetric dominance and prominence. Soc. Cognit. 17 (1999) 118-139
64. Seeley T.D. Honey bee colonies are group-level adaptive units. Am. Nat. 150 (1997) s22-s24
65. Seeley T.D., and Visscher P.K. Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees. Apidologie 35 (2004) 101-116
66. Sen A.K. Collective Choice and Social Welfare (1970), Holden-Day, San Francisco
67. Shafir E.B., Osherson D.N., and Smith E.E. An advantage model of choice. J. Behav. Decision Making 2 (1989) 1-23
68. Shafir S. Intransitivity of preferences in honey bees: Support for 'comparative' evaluation of foraging options. Anim. Behav. 48 (1994) 55-67
69. Shafir S., Waite T.A., and Smith B.H. Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and gray gays (Perisoreus canadensis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51 (2002) 180-187
70. Shafir S., Bechar A., and Weber E.U. Cognition-mediated coevolution context-dependent evaluations and sensitivity of pollinators to variability in nectar rewards. Plant Syst. Evol. 238 (2003) 195-209
71. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 (1948) 379-423 623-656
72. Sibley, R.M., Smith, R.H. (Eds.), 1985. In: Learning to exploit patchily distributed food. Behavioral Ecology: 25th Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 189-205.
73. Simon, H.A., 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality, vols. 1, 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
74. Simon H.S. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69 (1955) 99-118
75. Simonson I. Get closer to your customers by understanding how they make choices. California Manage. Rev. 35 (1993) 68-84
76. Skinner B.F. Science and Human Behavior (1953), MacMillan, New York
77. Stephens D.W. On economically tracking a fluctuating environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 32 (1987) 15-25
78. Stephens D.W., and Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging: some simple stochastic models. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10 (1982) 251-263
79. Stephens D.W., and Krebs J.R. Foraging Theory (1986), Princeton University Press, Princeton
80. Strausfeld N.J. Atlas of an Insect Brain (1976), Springer, Berlin
81. Strotz R.H. Myopian and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23 (1956) 163-180
82. Thaler R.H., and Shefrin H.M. An economic theory of self-control. J. Polit. Econ. 89 (1981) 392-406
83. Théry M., and Casas J. Visual systems: predator and prey views of spider camouflage. Nature 415 (2002) 133
84. Tinbergen N. "Derived" activities: their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 27 (1952) 1-32
85. Tversky A. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol. Rev. 76 (1969) 31-48
86. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131
87. Tversky A., and Simonson I. Context-dependent preferences. Manage. Sci. 39 (1993) 1179-1189
88. Waddington K.D., and Gottlieb N. Actual vs. perceived profitability-a study of floral choice of honey-bees. J. Insect Behavior 3 (1990) 429-441
89. Waite T.A. Intransitive preferences in hoarding gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50 (2001) 116-121
90. Wedell D.H. Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. 17 (1991) 767-778
91. Wegener. The Complexity of Boolean Functions (1987), Wiley, New York
92. Wiegmann D.D., Wiegmann D.A., MacNeal J., and Gafford J. Transposition of flower height by bumble bee foragers (Bombus impatiens). Anim. Cognit. 3 (2000) 85-89
93. Zimmerman J., and Ferster C.B. Some notes on time out from reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 7 (1964) 13-19