Assessing the role of competition and stress: A critique of importance indices and the development of a new approach

Journal of Ecology

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 577-585

  Rees, Mark ^a   Childs, Dylan Z ^a   Freckleton, Robert P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competition importance and intensity; Indices; Plant plant interactions; Productivity gradients; Stress; Variance decomposition

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLANT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

EID: 84859719545     PISSN: 00220477     EISSN: 13652745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01946.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brooker, R.W. (2006) Plant-plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytologist, 171, 271-284.
2. Brooker, R.W. & Kikividze, Z. (2008) Importance: an overlooked concept in plant interaction research. Journal of Ecology, 96, 703-708.
3. Brooker, R., Kikvidze, Z., Pugnaire, F.I., Callaway, R.M., Choler, P., Lortie, C.J. & Michalet, R. (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos, 109, 63-70.
4. Campbell, B.D. & Grime, J.P. (1992) An experimental test of plant strategy theory. Ecology, 73, 15-29.
5. Carlyle, C.N., Fraser, L.H. & Turkington, R. (2010) Using three pairs of competitive indices to test for changes in plant competition under different resource and disturbance levels. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21, 1025-1034.
6. Chesson, P. (2000) General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 58, 211-237.
7. Chesson, P. (2008) Quantifying and testing species coexistence mechanisms. Unity in Diversity: Reflections on Ecology after the Legacy of Ramon Margalef (eds F. Vallarares, A. Camacho, A. Elosegui, C. Gracia, M. Estrada, J.C. Senar & J.M. Gili ), pp. 119-164. Fundacion BBVA, Bilbao.
8. Freckleton, R.P. & Watkinson, A.R. (1997) Measuring plant neighbour effects. Functional Ecology, 11, 532-534.
9. Freckleton, R.P., Watkinson, A.R. & Rees, M. (2009) Measuring the importance of competition in plant communities. Journal of Ecology, 97, 379-384.
10. Gaucherand, S., Liancourt, P. & Lavorel, S. (2006) Importance and intensity of competition along a fertility gradient and across species. Journal of Vegetation Science, 17, 455-464.
11. Goldberg, D.E., Rajaniemi, T., Gurevitch, J. & Stewart-Oaten, A. (1999) Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology, 80, 1118-1131.
12. Grace, J.B. (1995) On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology, 76, 305-308.
13. Grime, J.P. (2002) Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
14. Gross, N., Liancourt, P., Choler, P., Suding, K.N. & Lavorel, S. (2010) Strain and vegetation effects on local limiting resources explain the outcomes of biotic interactions. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 12, 9-19.
15. Kadmon, R. (1995) Plant competition along soil-moisture gradients - a field experiment with the desert annual Stipa capensis. Journal of Ecology, 83, 253-262.
16. Kikividze, Z., Suzuki, M. & Brooker, R. (2011) Importance versus intensity of ecological effects: why context matters. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 383-388.
17. Kikvidze, Z. & Brooker, R. (2010) Towards a more exact definition of the importance of competition - a reply to Freckleton et al. (2009). Journal of Ecology, 98, 719-724.
18. Kunstler, G., Albert, C.H., Courbaud, B., Lavergne, S., Thuiller, W., Vieilledent, G., Zimmermann, N.E. & Coomes, D.A. (2011) Effects of competition on tree radial-growth vary in importance but not in intensity along climatic gradients. Journal of Ecology, 99, 300-312.
19. Lamb, E.G., Kembel, S.W. & Cahill, J.F. (2009) Shoot, but not root, competition reduces community diversity in experimental mesocosms. Journal of Ecology, 97, 155-163.
20. Martorell, C. & Villarreal-Barajas, T. (2009) Species-specific disturbance tolerance, competition and positive interactions along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 1027-1040.
21. Pacala, S.W. & Levin, S.A. (1997) Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. Spatial Ecology. The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions (eds D. Tilman & P. Kareiva ), pp. 204-232. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
22. Rees, M. & Brown, V.K. (1992) Interactions between invertebrate herbivores and plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 80, 353-360.
23. Rees, M., Osborne, C.P., Woodward, F.I., Hulme, S.P., Turnbull, L.A. & Taylor, S.H. (2010) Partitioning the components of RGR: how important is plant size variation. American Naturalist, 176, E152-E161.
24. le Roux, P.C. & McGeoch, M.A. (2010) Interaction intensity and importance along two stress gradients: adding shape to the stress-gradient hypothesis. Oecologia, 162, 733-745.
25. Sears, A.L.W. & Chesson, P. (2007) New methods for quantifying the spatial storage effect: an illustration with desert annuals. Ecology, 88, 2240-2247.
26. Seifan, M., Tielborger, K. & Kadmon, R. (2010) Direct and indirect interactions among plants explain counterintuitive positive drought effects on an eastern Mediterranean shrub species. Oikos, 119, 1601-1609.
27. Seifan, M., Seifan, T., Ariza, C. & Tielborger, K. (2010) Facilitating an importance index. Journal of Ecology, 98, 356-361.
28. Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
29. Weigelt, A. & Jolliffe, P. (2003) Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 91, 707-720.