Learning and transfer of category knowledge in an indirect categorization task

Psychological Research

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 292-303

  Helie, Sebastien ^a   Ashby, F Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859717353     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0348-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
2. Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W., & Waldron, E. M. (2003). Procedural learning in classification. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1114-1125.
3. Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 33-53.
4. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178.
5. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., & Bohil, C. J. (2002). Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning. Memory & Cognition, 30, 666-677.
6. Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for "same"-"different" judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 169-174.
7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). Psychophysics software for use with MATLAB. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
8. Brooks, L. R., Squire-Graydon, R., & Wood, T. J. (2007). Diversion of attention in everyday concept learning: identification in the service of use. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1-14.
9. Helie, S., Waldschmidt, J. G., & Ashby, F. G. (2010). Automaticity in rule-based and information-integration categorization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1013-1031.
10. Krueger, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
11. Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.
12. Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (2004). Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning. Behavioural Processes, 66, 309-332.
13. Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Bohil, C. J. (2003). Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 650-662.
14. Maddox, W. T., & Ing, A. D. (2005). Delayed feedback disrupts the procedural-learning system but not the hypothesis-testing system in perceptual category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 100-107.
15. Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592-613.
16. Minda, J. P., & Miles, S. J. (2010). The influence of verbal and nonverbal processing on category learning. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 52, 117-162.
17. Minda, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2004). Learning categories by making predictions: an investigation of indirect category learning. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1355-1368.
18. Thomas, R. D. (1996). Separability and independence of dimensions within the Same-different judgment task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 318-341.
19. Waldron, E. M., & Ashby, F. G. (2001). The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 168-176.