Migration issues and representation in European liberal democracies

Representation

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 29-46

  Lefkofridi, Zoe ^a   Horvath, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859716383     PISSN: 00344893     EISSN: 17494001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2012.653233     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ÀLVAREZ-RIVERA, M. 2009. Election Resources on the Internet available at http://electionresources.org/at, accessed 15 December 2010
2. ALVAREZ, M. and NAGLER, J. 2004. Party system compactnesss: consequences and measures. Political Analysis, 12(1): 46-62.
3. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION (APSA). 1950. Towards a more responsible party system: a report of the committee on political parties. American Political Science Review, 44(3) Part 2, supplement
4. ARZHEIMER, K. 2009. Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in western Europe, 1980-2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2): 259-75.
5. BALE, T. 2003. Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems. West European Politics, 26(3): 67-90.
6. BALE, T., GREEN-PEDERSEN, C., KROUWEL, A., LUTHER, K. R. and SITTER, N. 2009. If you can't beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political Studies, 58(3): 410-26.
7. BAUBÖCK, R. 2005a. Expansive citizenship: voting beyond territory and membership. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(4): 683-7.
8. BAUBÖCK, R. 2005b. "Citizenship policies: international, state, migrant and democratic perspectives. Migrants, labour markets and integration in Europe: a comparative analysis". In Global Migration Perspectives N. 19. Geneva: Global Commission on International Migration
9. BAUBÖCK, R. 2006a. The acquisition and loss of nationality in 15 EU states: results of the comparative project NATAC. IMISCOE, Policy Brief N. 2
10. BAUBÖCK, R. 2006b. Who are the citizens of Europe?. Eurozine, available at www.eurozine.com/articles/2006-12-23-baubock-en.html, accessed 2 January 2011
11. BAUBÖCK, R. and GOODMAN, S. WALLACE. 2010. Naturalization. European Union Democracy Observatory on Citizenship, Policy Brief N. 2, available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/policy-briefs, accessed 2 December 2010
12. BAUBÖCK, R., E. ERSBØLL, K. GROENENDIJK and H. WALDRAUCH (eds), 2006. Acquisition and Loss of Nationality-Policies and Trends in 15 European States: Summary and Recommendations. Vienna: Institute for Integration Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences.
13. BENHABIB, S. 2002. The Claims of Culture. Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
14. CARAMANI, D. and STRIJBIS, O. 2012. "What is the denominator? The inclusiveness of electorates and voter-representative congruence". In Political Representation: New Insights into Old Questions, Edited by: Bühlmann, Marc and Fivaz, Jan. London: Palgrave. (forthcoming)
15. DAHL, R. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. DAHL, R. 1997. "Toward democracy-a journey". In Reflections: 1940-1997, Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
17. DOW, JAY. 2001. A comparative spatial analysis of majoritarian and proportional elections. Electoral Studies 20: 109-25.
18. DOW, J. 2010. Party system compactness in majoritarian and proportional electoral systems. British Journal of Political Science, 41: 346-61.
19. DOWNS, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.
20. DÖRING, H. and MANOW, P. 2010. Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): an infrastructure for empirical information on political institutions-Version 10/02
21. DUVERGER, M. 1954. Political Parties, New York: Wiley.
22. EZROW, L. 2007. The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters. Journal of Politics, 69(1): 182-92.
23. EZROW, L. 2008. Parties' policy programmes and the dog that didn't bark: no evidence that proportional systems promote extreme party positioning. British Journal of Political Science, 38: 479-97.
24. FACCHINI, G. and MAYDA, A. M. 2009. "From individual attitudes towards migrants to migration policy outcomes: theory and evidence". In Economic Policy 56: 651-713
25. FREEMAN, G. 1995. Modes of immigration politics in liberal democratic states. International Migration Review, 29(4): 881-902.
26. GALLAGHER, M. and MITCHELL, P. 2008. The Politics of Electoral Systems, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
27. GEORGIADOU, V. 2008. The Far Right and the Consequences of Consensus. Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Austria, Germany. Athens: Kastanioti.
28. GEYER, F. 2007. Trends in the EU-27 Regarding Participation of Third Country Nationals in the Host Country's Political Life, Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department C/Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
29. GOLDER, M. 2003. Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36(4): 432-66.
30. GOLDER, M. and STRAMSKI, J. 2010. Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 54: 90-106.
31. GROENENDIJK, K. 2008. Local Voting Rights for Non-Nationals in Europe: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
32. HARMEL, R and SVÅSAND, L. 1997. The influence of new parties on old parties' platforms: the case of the progress parties and conservative parties of Denmark and Norway. Party Politics, 3(3): 315-40.
33. HOOGHE, L., BAKKER, R., BRIGEVICH, A., DE VRIES, C., EDWARDS, E., MARKS, G., ROVNY, J. and STEENBERGEN, M. 2010. Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: the Chapell Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research, 4: 684-703.
34. HUDDLESTON, T. 2009. Migration and Democracy: Migrant Participation in Public Affairs Organization for Security & Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and Migration Policy Group (MPG)
35. HUNGER, U. 2001. Party competition and inclusion of immigrants in Germany. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse, 1(3): 302-30.
36. HUYSMANS, J. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity. Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, London: Routledge.
37. KESTILÄ-KEKKONEN, E. and WASS, H. 2008. Representation of the work-related immigration issue: positions of the Finnish electorate and MP candidates in the 2003 parliamentary elections. Ethnopolitics, 7(4): 413-32.
38. KITSCHELT, H. and MCGANN, A. J. 2005. The radical right in the Aps. Evolution of support for the Swiss SVP and the Austrian FPÖ. Party Politics, 11: 147-71.
39. LAWRENCE, J. and MAXWELL, R. 2012. "Political parties and diversity in Western Europe". In Immigrant Politics: Race and Representation in Western Europe, Edited by: Givens, Terrie E. and Rahsaan Maxwell, R. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. forthcoming
40. LELKES, O., PLATT, L. and WARD, T. 2009. "Vulnerable groups: the situation of people with migrant backgrounds". In European Inequalities. Social Inclusion and Income Distribution in the European Union, Edited by: Ward, T., Lelkes, O., Sutherland, H. and Tóth, I. G. Budapest: TÁRKI Social Research Institute. pp. 69-102
41. LIJPHART, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
42. LUBBERS, M., GIJSBERTS, M. and SCHEEPERS, P. 2002. Extreme-right wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41(3): 345-78.
43. MARKS, G., HOOGHE, L., NELSON, M. and EDWARDS, E. 2006. Party competition and European integration in the east and west: different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39: 155-75.
44. MESSINA, A. M. 2007. The Logics and Politics of Post-WWII Migration to Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. MINKEBERG, M. 2001. The radical right in public office: agenda-setting and policy effects. West European Politics, 24(4): 1-21.
46. MÜNZ, R. 2004. "Migrants, labour markets and integration in Europe: a comparative analysis". In Global Migration Perspectives N. 16. Geneva: Global Commission on International Migration
47. NIESSEN, J., HUDDLESTON, T., CITRON, L., GEDDES, A. and JACOBS, D. 2007. Migration Policy Index (MIPEX), Brussels: British Council and Migration Policy Group.
48. NORRIS, P. 2005. Radical Right: Parties and Electoral Competition, New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. OESCH, D. 2008. Explaining workers' support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway and Switzerland. International Political Science Review, 29(3): 349-73.
50. PITKIN, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. POLITIS. 2007. Final Activity Report of Building Europe with New Citizens? An Inquiry into the Civic Participation of Naturalized Citizens and Foreign Residents in 25 Countries. Oldenburg: Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Institut für Bildung und Kommunikation in Migrationsprozessen
52. POWELL, B. G. 2009. The ideological congruence controversy: the impact of alternative conceptualizations and data on the effects of election rules. Comparative Political Studies, 49: 1475-97.
53. POWELL, B. G. and VANBERG, G. S. 2000. Election laws, disproportionality and median correspondence: implications for two visions of democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 30(3): 383-411.
54. RYDGREN, J. 2005. Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research, 44: 413-37.
55. RYDGREN, J. 2007. The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 241-62.
56. SARTORI, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. SCHATTSCHNEIDER, ELMER E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
58. SPENCER, R. 2003. The Politics of Migration: Managing Opportunity, Conflict and Change, Edited by: SPENCER, R. Oxford: The Political Quarterly/Blackwell.
59. STEENBERGEN, M. and MARKS, G. 2007. Evaluating expert surveys. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3): 347-66.
60. THOMASSEN, A. J.J. and SCHMITT, H. 1997. Policy representation. European Journal of Political Research, 32(2): 165-84.
61. VAN DER BRUG, W. and FENNEMA, M. 2003. Protest or mainstream? How the European anti-immigrant parties developed into two separate groups by1999. European Journal of Political Research, 42: 55-76.
62. VAN DER BRUG, W and VAN SPANJE, J. 2009. Immigration, Europe and the 'new cultural dimension'. European Journal of Political Research, 48: 309-34.
63. VAN DER BRUG, W., FENNEMA, M. and TILLIE, J. 2000. Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: ideological or protest vote?. European Journal of Political Research, 37: 77-102.
64. VAN DER BRUG, W., FENNEMA, M. and TILLIE, J. 2005. Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: a two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies, 38: 537-73.
65. VAN SPANJE, J. 2010. Contagious parties: anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties' immigration stances in contemporary western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5): 563-86.
66. WODAK, R. and PELINKA, A. 2002. The Haider Phenomenon in Austria New Brunswick Transaction Publishers
67. WÜST, A. 2006. Wahlverhalten und politische Repräsentation von Migranten. Der Bürger Im Staat: Zuwanderung und Integration, 56(4): 228-34.