Application of image texture analysis for varietal classification of barley

International Agrophysics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 81-90

  Zapotoczny, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Automated kernel grading; Barley; Digital image analysis; Discrimination; Image texture analysis

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; DIGITAL IMAGE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; TEXTURE;

HORDEUM;

EID: 84859704782     PISSN: 02368722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10247-012-0012-z     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bharati Manish H., Liu J.J., and MacGregor F., 2004. Image texture analysis: methods and comparisons. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 72, 57-71.
2. Chandraratne M.R., Samarasinghe S., Kulasiri D., and Bickerstaffe R., 2006. Prediction of lamb tenderness using image surface texture features. J. Food Eng., 77, 492-499.
3. Choudhary R., Paliwal J., and Jayas D.S., 2009. Classification of cereal grains using wavelet, morphological, colour, and textural features of non-touching kernel images. Biosys. Eng., 99, 330-337.
4. Courtois F., Faessel M., and Bonazzi C., 2010. Assessing breakage and cracks of parboiled rice kernels by image analysis techniques. Food Control, 21, 567-572.
5. Emadzadeh B., Razavi S.M.A., and Farahmandfar R., 2010. Monitoring geometric characteristics of rice during processing by image analysis system and micrometer measurement. Int. Agrophys., 24, 21-27.
6. Foley D.H., 1972. Considerations of sample and feature size. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 18, 618-626.
7. Gancarz M., Konstankiewicz K., Pawlak K., and Zdunek A., 2007. Analysis of plant tissue images obtained by confocal tandem scanning reflected light microscope. Int. Agrophysics, 21, 49-53.
8. Jayas D.S., Paliwal J., and Visen N.S., 2000. Multi-layer neural networks for image analysis of agricultural products. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 77(2), 119-128.
9. Li J., Tan J., and Shatadal P., 2001. Classification of tough and tender beef by image texture analysis. Meat Sci., 57, 341-346.
10. Majumdar S. and Jayas D.S., 2000a. Classification of cereal grains using machine vision: I. Morphology models. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 43(6), 1669-1675.
11. Majumdar S. and Jayas D.S., 2000b. Classification of cereal grains using machine vision: II. Color Models. Morphology models. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 43(6), 1677-1680.
12. Majumdar S. and Jayas D.S., 2000c. Classification of cereal grains using machine vision: III. Texture Models. Morphology models. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 43(6), 1681-1687.
13. Materka A. and Strzelecki M., 1998. Texture Analysis Methods - A Review. Technical University of Łódź, Institute of Electronics, COST B11 report, Brussels, Belgium.
14. Neuman M., Sapristein H.D., Shwedyk E., and Bushuk W., 1989a. Wheat grain color analysis by digital image processing: I. Methodology. J. Cereal Sci., 10(3), 175-182.
15. Neuman M., Sapristein H.D., Shwedyk E., and Bushuk W., 1989b. Wheat grain color analysis by digital image processing: II. Wheat class determination. J. Cereal Sci., 10(3), 183-188.
16. Quevedo R., Carlos L.G., Aguilera J.M., and Cadoche L., 2002. Description of food surfaces and microstructural changes using fractal image texture analysis. J. Food Eng., 53, 361-371.
17. Tahir A.R., Neethirajan S., Jayas D.S., Shahin M.A., Symons S.J., and White N.D.G., 2007. Evaluation of the effect of moisture content on cereal grains by digital image analysis. Food Res. Int., 40, 1140-1145.
18. Zieliński K. and Strzelecki M., 2002. Computerized Analysis of Biomedical Images (in Polish). PWN Press, Warsaw-Łódź, Poland.