The Legacy of Positivism and the Emergence of Interpretive Tradition in Spatial Planning

Regional Studies

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 429-441

  Davoudi, Simin ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cartographical representation; Evidence based policy; Interpretive planning; Nested scale; Positivist planning; Relational space; Time and future

Indexed keywords

CARTOGRAPHY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING PROCESS; SPATIAL PLANNING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84859634513     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.618120     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abercrombie, P. 1933. Town and Country Planning, London: Thornton/Butterworth.
2. Agnew, J. 2005. "Space: place". In Spaces of Geographical Thought, Edited by: Cloke, P. and Johnson, R. 81-97. London: Sage.
3. Allmendinger, P. 2002. Planning Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4. Allmendinger, P. and Haughton, G. 2009. Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Themes Gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41: 617-633.
5. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. 1995. "Globalisation, 'institutional thickness' and the local economy". In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, Edited by: Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madanipour, A. 91-108. Chichester: Wiley.
6. Audi, R. 1996. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Barnes, T. 2001. Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the cultural turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91: 546-565.
8. Baumann, Z. 1995. "Searching for a centre that holds". In Global Modernities, Edited by: Featherstone, M., Lash, S. and Robertson, R. 140-154. London: Sage.
9. BBR (Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning). 2001. Spatial Development and Spatial Planning in Germany, 15Berlin: BBR.
10. Beauregard P. (1989) Between modernity and postmodernity: the ambiguous position of US planning, Environment and Planning D7(4), 381-395.
11. Beauregard, P. 2005. "Planning and the network city: discursive correspondences". In The Network Society: A New Context for Planning, Edited by: Albrechts, L. and Mandelbaum, S. 24-34. London: Routledge.
12. Brenner, N. 2000. The urban question: reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2): 361-378.
13. Cabinet Office. 1999a. Modernising Government, London: Cm 4310. Stationary Office.
14. Cabinet Office. 1999b. Professional Policy Making for the 21st Century, London: Cabinet Office.
15. Davoudi, S. 2006. Evidence-based planning: rhetoric and reality. DISP, 165(2): 14-25.
16. Davoudi S. (2008) Conceptions of the city region: a critical review, Journal of Urban Design and Planning,161(DP2), 51-60.
17. Davoudi, S. Climate risk and security: new meanings of the 'environment' in English planning system. European Planning Studies, Forthcoming 2012
18. Davoudi, S. and Madanipour, A. Two Charters of Athens and two visions of utopia: functional and connected. Built Environment, Forthcoming 2012
19. Davoudi, S. and Strange, I. 2009. Conceptions of Space & Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, Edited by: Davoudi, S. and Strange, I. London: Routledge.
20. Davoudi, S. and Strange, I. 2009b. "Space and place in the twentieth century planning: an analytical framework and an historical review". In Conceptions of Space & Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, Edited by: Davoudi, S. and Strange, I. 7-42. London: Routledge.
21. Dear, M. 1995. "Prolegomena to a post-modern urbanism". In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, Edited by: Healey, P., Cameron, S. J., Davoudi, S., Graham, A. and Madanipour, A. 27-44. Chichester: Wiley.
22. Department for Regional Development. 2001. Regional Development Strategy for Northern Ireland 2025: Shaping Our Future, Belfast: Department for Regional Development.
23. Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). 2007. Using Evidence in Spatial Planning, London: DCLG.
24. Doxiadis, C. 1968. Ekistics, London: Hutchinson.
25. Duhr, S. 2007. The Visual Language of Spatial Planning, London: Routledge.
26. Ellias, N. 1992. Time: An Essay, Oxford: Blackwell.
27. European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP). 1999. Towards a Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
28. Faludi, A. 1973. Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon.
29. Fischler, R. 1995. "Strategy and history in professional practice: planning as world making". In Spatial Practices, Edited by: Ligget, H. and Perry, D. C. 13-59. London: Sage.
30. Friedmann, J. 1993. Toward a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4): 482-485.
31. Greater London Authority. 2004. London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London, London: Greater London Authority.
32. Hagen, J. E. 2010. Branding, Bonding, Bringing about... The Performance of Landscape Concepts in Spatial Planning, Wageningen: Wageningen University.
33. Haggett, P. 1965. Locational Analysis in Human Geography, London: Edward Arnold.
34. Hall, P. 2002. Cities of Tomorrow, 3, Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Harley, J. B. 1988. "Maps, knowledge and power". In Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environment, Edited by: Cosgrove, D. and Daniel, S. 277-312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Harley, J. B. 1992. "Deconstructing the map". In Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text and Metaphor, Edited by: Barnes, T. J. and Duncan, S. J. 231-247. London: Routledge.
37. Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Post-modernity, Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, Nature and Geography of Difference, Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London: Macmillan.
40. Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies, Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, London: Routledge.
41. Hoch, C. 1994. What Planners Do: Power, Politics, and Persuasion, Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
42. Hollis, M. 2003. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Howard, E. 1902. Garden Cities of To-morrow, London: Swan Sonnensche.
44. Hubbard, P., Kitchin, R. and Valentine, G. 2004. "Editors' introduction". In Key Thinkers on Space and Place, pp. 1-13, Edited by: Hubbard, P., Kitchin, R. and Valentine, G. London: Sage.
45. Innes, J. 1996. Planning through consensus building, a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. American Planning Association Journal, 62(4): 460-472.
46. Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
47. Jensen, O. and Richardson, T. 2004. Making of European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity, London: Routledge.
48. Joyce, P. 2003. The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City, London: Verso.
49. Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern trans. Porter C. Harvard University Press, Mass
50. Latour, B. 2005. From Realpolitike to Dingpolitik, or How to Make Things Public (available at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/expositions/96-MTP-DING.pdf) (accessed on 15 September 2010)
51. Le Corbusier. 1925/1929. L'Urbanisme Cres, Paris; trans. Etchelle F. (1929) as The City of Tomorrow and its Planning. John Podher, London
52. Le Corbusier. 1935/1967. La Ville Radieuse Freal et Cie, Paris; trans. Knight P., Levieux E. and Coltman D. (1967) as The Radiant City. Faber & Faber, London
53. Leccardie, C. 2008. New biographies in the 'risk society'? About future and planning. The 21st Century Society, Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 3(2): 119-129.
54. Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space trans. Donaldson-Smith N. from the original 1974 Edn. Blackwell, Oxford
55. Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The science of 'muddling through'. Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.
56. London Borough of Barnet. 2009. Characterisation Study of London Borough of Barnet, Draft Final Report, Section I: Introduction, London Borough of Barnet.
57. Luhmann, N. 1982. "The future cannot begin: temporal structures in modern society". In The Differentiation of Society, Edited by: Luhmann, N. 271-289. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
58. Madanipour, A. 1995. "Reading the city". In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, Edited by: Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madanipour, A. 21-26. London: Wiley.
59. Magee, B. 1973. Popper, Glasgow: Collins/Fontana.
60. Massey, D. 2005. For Space, London: Sage.
61. Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-Structuralist Geography, London: Sage.
62. Murray, M. 2009. "Building consensus in contested spaces and places: The Regional Development Strategy for Northern Ireland". In Conceptions of Space & Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, Edited by: Davoudi, S. and Strange, I. 125-147. London: Routledge.
63. Nadin, V. 2007. The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice and Research, 22(1): 43-62.
64. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). 2004a. Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Development Frameworks, London: ODPM.
65. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). 2004b. The Planning Response to Climate Change: Advice on Better Practice, London: ODPM.
66. Osborne, T. and Rose, N. 1999. Spatial phenomenotechnics: making space with Charles Booth and Patrick Geddes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22: 209-228.
67. Pagden, A. 2005. "What sparks intellectual movements?". In Times Higher Education Supplement 29 April, 16-17
68. Peattie, L. 1987. Planning Ciudad Guayana, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
69. Planning. 2009. Centre extends science of planning. Planning, 19(June): 23
70. Sandercock, L. 2003. Out of the closet: the importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 4(1): 11-28.
71. Schumaker, P. D. 1978. The quest for control: a critique of the rational-central-rule approach in public affairs. Journal of Politics, 40(1): 239-242.
72. Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve Human Conditions Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
73. Scottish Executive. 2004. National Planning Framework for Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
74. Scruton, R. 1996. Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey, London: Mandarin.
75. Sert J. L. (1944) Can Our Cities Survive? An ABC of Urban Problems, their Analysis, their Solution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Appx.
76. Smith, A. F. M. 1996. Mad cows and ecstasy: chance and choice in an evidence-based society. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 159(3): 367-383.
77. Soja, E. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory, London: Verso.
78. Taylor, N. 1998. Urban Planning Theory Since 1945, London: Sage.
79. Taylor, P. 2005. "Time: from hegemonic change to everyday life". In Key Concepts in Geography, Edited by: Holloway, S., Rice, S. and Valentine, G. 151-164. London: Sage.
80. Unger, R. 2007. The Self Awakened: Pragmatism Unbound, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Watson, V. 2003. Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 4(4): 395-407.
82. Weiss, C. H. 1975. "Evaluation research in the political context". In Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 1, Edited by: Struening, E. S. and Guttentag, M. 13-25. London: Sage.
83. Welsh Assembly Government. 2004. Wales Spatial Plan: People, Places, Futures, Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
84. Yorkshire and Humber Assembly. 2006. Yorkshire and Humber Plan, Wakefield: Yorkshire and Humber Assembly.
85. Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A. and Grayson, L. 2002. Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3): 215-224.