The Role of Spatial Data and Spatial Information in Strategic Spatial Planning

Regional Studies

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 423-428

  Dühr, Stefanie ^a   Müller, André ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Federal Institute for Research on Building   (Germany)

^c SCIENCES PO   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL PLANNING;

EID: 84859628933     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.669535     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Böhme, K. and Schön, P. 2006. From Leipzig to Leipzig. Territorial research delivers evidence for the new territorial agenda of the European Union. disP, 165: 61-70.
2. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2007a. ESPON 2013 Programme. The Operational Programme, Brussels: CEC.
3. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2007b. State of European Cities Report. Adding Value to the European Urban Audit, Brussels: CEC.
4. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2007c. Survey on Perceptions of Quality of Life in 75 European Cities, Brussels: CEC.
5. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2008. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, Brussels: CEC.
6. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2010. Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Investing in Europe's Future, Brussels: CEC.
7. Council of the European Union. 2007. "Directive 2007/2/EC establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)". In Official Journal L108(25 April)
8. Council of the European Union, German Presidency. 2007a. Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed on the Occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig on 24/25 May 2007, Berlin: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS).
9. Council of the European Union, German Presidency. 2007b. The Territorial State and Perspective of the European Union. Towards a Stronger European Territorial Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions. A Background Document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, Berlin: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS).
10. Council of the European Union, Hungarian Presidency. 2011a. Territorial Agenda 2020, Gödöllo{double acute}: Council of the European Union.
11. Council of the European Union, Hungarian Presidency. 2011b. The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union, Gödöllo{double acute}: Council of the European Union.
12. Crampton, J. W. 2001. Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualisation. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2): 235-252.
13. Davoudi, S. 2006. Evidence-based planning. Rhetoric and reality. disP, 165: 14-24.
14. Dühr, S. 2007. The Visual Language of Spatial Planning. Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe, London: Routledge.
15. Dühr, S., Colomb, C. and Nadin, V. 2010. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, London: Routledge.
16. Faludi, A. and Waterhout, B. 2006. Introducing evidence-based planning. disP, 165: 4-13.
17. Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. Harley, J. B. 1989. Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2): 1-20.
19. Hills, S. 2002. "The role of environmental information in spatial planning: a case study of regional planning in Brandenburg, Germany". Unpublished PhD thesis, University of the West of England, Bristol
20. Pickles, J. 1992. "Text, hermeneutics and propaganda maps". In Writing Worlds. Discourse, Text & Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape, Edited by: Barnes, T. J. and Duncan, J. S. 193-230. London: Routledge.
21. Pickles, J. 1995. "Representation in an electronic age: geography, GIS, and democracy". In Ground Truth. The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems, Edited by: Pickles, J. 1-30. New York, NY: Guilford.
22. Rae, A. 2009. From spatial interaction data to spatial interaction information? Geovisualisation and spatial structures of migration from the 2001 UK census. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33: 161-178.
23. Richardson, T. 2006. The thin simplifications of European space: dangerous calculations?. Comparative European Politics, 4: 203-217.
24. Söderström, O. 1996. Paper cities: visual thinking in urban planning. Ecumene, 3(3): 249-281.
25. Stephenson, R. 1999. "Information systems and policy processes in planning". Unpublished PhD thesis, Oxford Brooks University, Oxford
26. Veregin, H. 1995. "Computer innovation and adoption in geography: a critique of conventional technological models". In Ground Truth. The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems, Edited by: Pickles, J. 88-112. New York, NY: Guilford.