Continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine fails to provide adequate analgesia after caesarean section

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 119-124

  Kainu, J P ^a   Sarvela, J ^a   Halonen, P ^a   Puro, H ^a   Toivonen, H J ^a   Halmesmaki E ^a   Korttila, K T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Continuous wound infusion; Intrathecal morphine; Postoperative pain; Ropivacaine

Indexed keywords

DROPERIDOL; HYDROXYZINE; KETOPROFEN; METOCLOPRAMIDE; MORPHINE; NALOXONE; ONDANSETRON; OXYCODONE; ROPIVACAINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG USE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PRURITUS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOMITING;

ADULT; AMIDES; ANALGESIA; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CESAREAN SECTION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, PARENTERAL; INJECTIONS, SPINAL; MORPHINE; OXYCODONE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859620596     PISSN: 0959289X     EISSN: 15323374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? BJOG 1998;105:45-52. (Pubitemid 28025355)
2. Carvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, Fuller A, Mathusamy AD, Macario A. Patient preferences for anesthesia outcomes associated with cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2005;10:1182-7. (Pubitemid 41383094)
3. Kainu JP, Sarvela J, Tiippana E, Halmesmaki E, Korttila KT. Persistent pain after caesarean section and vaginal birth: a cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010;19:4-9.
4. Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain 2008;140:87-94.
5. Mecklem DW, Humphrey MD, Hicks RW. Efficacy of bupivacaine delivered by wound catheter for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;35:416-21.
6. Fredman B, Shapiro A, Zohar E, et al. The analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled ropivacaine instillation after Cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1436-40.
7. Givens VA, Lipscomb GH, Meyer NL. A randomized trial of postoperative wound irrigation with local anesthetic for pain after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1188-91. (Pubitemid 34665058)
8. Zohar E, Shapiro A, Eidinov A, Fishman A, Fredman B. Postcesarean analgesia: the efficacy of bupivacaine wound instillation with and without supplemental diclofenac. J Clin Anesth 2006;18:415-21. (Pubitemid 44354093)
9. Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 1999;91:1919-27.
10. Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999;90:437-44. (Pubitemid 29071512)
11. Sarvela J, Halonen P, Soikkeli A, Korttila K. A double-blinded, randomized comparison of intrathecal and epidural morphine for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2002;95:436-40. (Pubitemid 34793116)
12. Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:891-903.
13. Sarvela PJ, Halonen PM, Soikkeli AI, Kainu JP, Korttila KT. Ondansetron and tropisetron do not prevent intraspinal morphine- and fentanyl-induced pruritus in elective cesarean delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50:239-44. (Pubitemid 43340859)
14. Ranta PO, Ala-Kokko TI, Kukkonen JE, et al. Incisional and epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective, placebocontrolled, randomised clinical study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006;15: 189-94. (Pubitemid 43959844)
15. Magnani E, Corosu R, Mancino P, Borgia ML. Postoperative analgesia after cesarean section by continued administration of levobupivacaine with the On-Q Painbuster system over the fascia vs ketorolac + morphine i.v Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2006;33: 223-5. (Pubitemid 44912936)
16. Lavand'homme PM, Roelants F, Waterloos H, De Kock MF. Postoperative analgesic effects of continuous wound infiltration with diclofenac after elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2007;106:1220-5.
17. Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, et al. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 2007;107: 461-8.
18. Rackelboom T, Le Strat S, Silvera S, et al. Improving continuous wound infusion effectiveness for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:893-900.
19. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief. The Cochran Database Syst Rev 2009, Jul 8;3 CD006954. Review.
20. Abouleish E, Rawal N, Rashad MN. The addition of 0.2 mg subarachnoid morphine to hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery: a prospective study of 856 cases. Reg Anesth 1991;16: 137-40.
21. Kato R, Shimamoto H, Terui K, Yokota K, Miyao H. Delayed respiratory depression associated with 0.15 mg intrathecal morphine for cesarean section: a review of 1915 cases. J Anesth 2008;22:112-6. (Pubitemid 351757011)
22. Horlocker TT, Burton AW, Connis RT, et al. Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration. Anesthesiology 2009;110:218-30.