Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Bamigboye, Anthony A ^a   Hofmeyr, G J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PLACEBO;

ANALGESIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA EXTRACTION; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; NERVE BLOCK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 44949224554     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006954     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Adams 1991 Adams WJ, Avramovic J, Barraclough BH. Wound infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine not effective for postoperative analgesia after cholecystectomy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1991; 61(8):626-30.
2. CDC 2002 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rate of cesarean delivery among Puerto Rican women: Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland 1992-2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2006;55(3):68-71.
3. Deeks 2001 Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: EggerM, Davey SmithG, AltmanDG editor(s). Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
4. Friedman 2001 Friedman B, Zohar E, Tarabykin A, Shapiro A, Mayo A, Klein E, et al.Bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device and a double-catheter systemdoes not decrease post-operative pain or opioid requirements aftermajor abdominal surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2000;93(2):514.
5. Ganta 1994 Ganta R, Samra SK, Maddineni VR, Furness G. Comparison of the effectiveness of bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block and wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994;72(2):229-30.
6. Givens 2002 Givens VA, Lipscomb GH, Meyr NL. A randomized trial of postoperative wound irrigation with local anesthetic for pain after cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 186:1188-91.
7. Higgins 2005 Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.4 [updated March 2005]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005. Chichester: Wiley. Updated quarterly.
8. Johansson 1997 Johanssen B, Hallerback B, Stubberod A, Janbu T, Edwin B, Glise H, et al.Preoperative local infiltration with ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after inguinal hernia repair. A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Surgery 1997;163(5):371-8.
9. Kumar 1999 Kumar Das A, Wig J, Dhaliwal L. Preincisional local infiltration of bupivacaine and a mixture of bupivacaine and morphine for pain following lower segment cesarean section (a comparative evaluation). Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 1999;15(3):317-20.
10. Pernoll 1991 Pernoll ML. Chapter 11. Current obstetric & gynecologic diagnosis and treatment. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1991:260.
11. RCOG 2001 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical Effectiveness Study Support Unit. The national sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: RCOG, 2001.
12. RevMan 2003 The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 4.2 for Windows. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003.
13. Trotter 1991 Trotter TN, Hayes-Gregson P, Robinson S, Cole L, Coley S, Fell D. Wound infiltration of local anaesthetic after lower segment caesarean section. Anaesthesia 1991;46(5):404-7.
14. Tshabangu 2002 Tshabangu KC, de Jong MA, de Villiers DJ, Du Toit JJ, Sha SMH. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector - 3-year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital. South African Medical Journal 2002;92(12):956-9.