Framing Cultures of Spatial Planning

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 87-101

  Ernste, Huib ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; PLANNING SYSTEM; POLICY ANALYSIS; RESEARCH; SPATIAL PLANNING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84859612369     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661194     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Allmendinger, P. 2002. Planning Theory, Hampshire: Palgrave.
2. Bateson, G. 1973. Steps to an Ecology of Mind, London: Paladin.
3. Benford, R. D. 1997. An Insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4): 409-430.
4. Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. 2000. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 11-39.
5. Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, Th. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality, Garden City: Doubleday.
6. Booth, Ph. 2005. "The nature of difference: Traditions of law and government and their effects on planning in Britain and France". In Comparative Planning Culture, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 259-284. London: Routledge.
7. Börzel, T. A. (1997) What's so special about policy networks? - An exploration of the concept and its usefulness in studying European governance, European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 1(16). Available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-016a.htm (accessed 8 February 2010)
8. Cullingworth, J. B. 1993. The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective, New York: Routledge.
9. D'Angelo, P. 2002. News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4): 870-888.
10. Danielzyk, R. and Weichhart, P. 2006. Planungsstile und Planungskulturen - Disposition eines Forschungsprojektes zur Planungstheorie [Planning Styles and Planning Cultures - Disposition of a research project on planning theory], Unpublished paper presented at the expert meeting on comparative planning culture studies, at the ILS- Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development in Dortmund, May 24, 2007.
11. Dear, M. J. 2000. The Postmodern Urban Condition, Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Ensink, T. 2003. "Transformational frames: Interpretative consequences of frame shifts and frame embeddings". In Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse, Edited by: Ensink, T. and Sauer, Ch. 63-90. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43: 51-58.
14. Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Evanston: Row Peterson.
15. Fisher, K. (1997) Locating frames in the discursive universe. Sociological Research Online, 2(3). Available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/4.html (accessed 1 February 2012)
16. Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices, New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Flyvberg, B. 1998. Rationality and Power. Democracy in practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Frank, M. 1989. What is Neostructuralism?, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Friedmann, J. 2005a. "Planning cultures in transition". In Comparative Planning Culture, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 29-44. London: Routledge.
20. Friedmann, J. 2005b. Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning, 64: 183-234.
21. Fürst, D. 2009. "Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of 'planning processes'?". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 23-38. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22. Giddens, A. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, New York: Harper & Row.
24. Gonos, G. 1977. 'Situation' versus 'Frame': The 'interactionist' and the 'itructuralist' analyses of everyday life. American Sociological Review, 42(6): 854-867.
25. Hägerstrand, T. 1970. What about people in regional science?. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24: 1-12.
26. Hermans, L. M and Thissen, W. A. H. 2009. Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 196: 808-818.
27. Hulst, M. J. van. 2008. Town Hall Tales: Culture as Storytelling in Local Government, Delft: Eburon.
28. Hulst, M. J. van and Yanow, D. 2009. Studying the Political Through Frame Analysis, Workshop, ECPR Joint Sessions, April 14-19, Lisbon
29. Innes, J. and Gruber, J. 2005. Planning styles in conflict. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2): 177-188.
30. Jameson, F. 1976. Review: On Goffman's frame analysis. Theory and Society, 3(1): 119-133.
31. Jann, W. 2000. Verwaltungskulturen im internationalen Vergleich. Ein Überblick über den Stand der empirischen Forschung [Administrative cultures in international comparison. An overview over state of the empirical research]. Die Verwaltung, 33: 325-350.
32. Jensen, O. B. and Richardson, T. 2001. Nested visions: New rationalities of space in European spatial planning. Regional Studies, 35(8): 703-717.
33. Kaufman, S. and Smith, J. 1999. Framing and reframing in land use change conflicts. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 16(2): 164-180.
34. Keller, D. A., Koch, M., & Selle, K. (Eds) (1993) Planungskulturen in Europa. Erkundungen in Deutschland, Frankreich, Italien und in der Schweiz [Planning cultures in Europe. Explorations in Germany, France, Italy and Switzerland], DISP, 115
35. Keller, D. A., Koch, M. and Selle, K. 1996. 'Either/or' and 'and': First impressions of a journey into the planning cultures of four countries. Planning Perspectives, 11(1): 41-54.
36. Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 2009a. "Spatial planning and culture - Symbiosis for a better understanding of cultural differences in planning systems, traditions and practices. Preface". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. xxiii-xxxv. Aldershot: Ashgate.
37. Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 2009b. "En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 39-62. Aldershot: Ashgate.
38. Laws, D. and Rein, M. 2003. "Reframing practice". In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Edited by: Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. 172-206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lei, T. van der. 2009. "Relating actor analysis methods to policy problems, PhD thesis". Technical University, Delft
40. Lindblom, Ch. E. 1959. The science of 'muddling through'. Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.
41. Masser, I. 1984. Cross national comparative planning studies. Town Planning Review, 55(2): 137-160.
42. Mote, J. E. 2001. From Schutz to Goffman: The search for social order. Review of Austrian Economics, 14(2-3): 219-231.
43. Naegler, D. 2003. Planung als soziale Konstruktion. Leitbilder als Steuerungsmedium in Stadtplanungsprozessen [Planning as Social Construction. Planning models as steering instrument in urban planning processes], Berlin: Sigma.
44. Nuehring, E. M. and Fein, S. B. 1978. Tacit choices: A process of becoming. The Pacific Sociological Review, 21(2): 159-172.
45. Piaget, J. 1973. The Child's Conception of the World, London: Paladin.
46. Poorter, M. 2005. "Democratische Legitimiteit van Governance Networks [Democratic Legitimity of Governance Networks], Master thesis". University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
47. Rein, M. and Schön, D. 1993. "Reframing policy discourse". In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Edited by: Fischer, F. and Forester, J. 145-166. (London: Duke University Press.
48. Richardson, J. J., Gustaffson, G. and Jordan, G. 1982. "The concept of policy style". In Policy Styles in Western Europe, Edited by: Richardson, J. J. 1-16. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
49. Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory, Gateshead: Avebury.
50. Sager, T. 2002. Democratic Planning and Social Choice Dilemmas: Prelude to Institutional Planning Theory, Aldershot: Ashgate.
51. Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis, Planning for Multicultural Cities, Chichester: Wiley.
52. Sanyal, B. 2005. "Preface". In Comparative Planning Culture, Edited by: Sanyal, B. xix-xxiv. London: Routledge.
53. Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder: Westview.
54. Scharpf, F. W. 2000a. Interaktionsformen. Akteurszentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung [Forms of Interaction. Actor centred institutionalism in policy research], Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
55. Scharpf, F. W. (2000b) Institutions in Comparative Policy Research. MPIfG Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, 00/3. Available at http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp00-3/wp00-3.html (accessed 8 February 2010)
56. Schütz, A. 1966. Collected Papers. Vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality, The Hague: Nijhoff.
57. Schütz, A. 1982. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, St. Barbara: Greenwood Press.
58. Schuyt, C. J. M. 1995. Filosofie van de sociale wetenschappen, Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
59. Seiß, R. 2008. Wer baut Wien?: Hintergründe und Motive der Stadtentwicklung Wiens seit 1989 [Who builds Vienna?: Backgrounds and Motives Behind the City Development of Vienna Since 1989], Salzburg: Pustet.
60. Selle, K. 1999. "Neue Planungskultur - Raumplanung auf dem Weg zum kooperativen Handeln? [New planning culture - Spatial planning on its way towards co-operative action?]". In Was ist Raumplanung? [What is Spatial Planning?] Edited by: Schmals, K. M. 210-226. (Dortmunder Beiträge zur Raumplanung, Vol. 89, Dortmund: Institut für Raumplanung)
61. Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace, Journies to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Stone, D. A. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, New York: Norton.
63. Sturm, R. 1985. "Die Politikstilanalyse. Zur Konkretisierung des Konzeptes der politischen Kultur in der Policy-Analyse [The policy style analysis. Towards a concretisation of the concept of policy culture in policy analysis]". In Policy-Forschung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Policy Research in the Federal Republic of Germany], Edited by: Hartwich, H. H. 111-116. Opladen: Leske + Burdrich.
64. Taylor, P. J. 1996. Embedded statism and the social sciences: Opening up to new spaces. Environment and Planning A, 28(11): 1917-1928. with invited responses of a range of social scientist to that article,pp. 1929-1995
65. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211: 453-458.
66. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1987. "Rational choice and the framing of decisions". In Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, Edited by: Hogarth, R. M. and Reder, M. W. 67-94. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. Waarden, F. van. 1995. "Persistence of national policy styles: A study of their institutional foundations". In Convergence or Diversity?, Edited by: Unger, B. and van Waarden, F. 333-373. Aldershot: Avebury.
68. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. and Fisch, R. 1973. Change, New York: Norton.
69. Weichhart, P. (1999) On people and life-world rationality in the planning process. Alexander von Humboldt Lecture in Human Geography, September 23, at the Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands. Available at http://socgeo.ruhosting.nl/colloquium/weichhart1.html (accessed 8 February 2010)
70. Wegener, M. 1994. Urban/regional models and planning cultures: Lessons from cross-national modelling projects. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(5): 629-641.
71. Wentz, M. 1992. "Sozialer Wandel und Planungskultur [Social change and planning culture]". In Planungskulturen [Planning Cultures], Edited by: Wentz, M. 10-19. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
72. Werlen, B. 1992. Society, Action and Space: An Alternative Human Geography, London: Routledge.
73. Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretative Policy Analysis, Newbury Park: Sage.
74. Yanow, D. 2007. Critical Policy Analysis, 1: 109-121.
75. Young, G. 2008. Reshaping Planning with Culture, Aldershot: Ashgate.
76. Zimbardo, P. G. and Leippe, M. R. 1991. The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence, New York: McGraw-Hill.