The Social Construction of Planning Systems: A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 41-61

  Servillo, Loris Antonio ^a   van den Broeck, Pieter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; PLANNING SYSTEM; PLANNING THEORY; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EID: 84859587643     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661179     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adams N. Cotella G. Nunes R. et al. Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU Routledge New York and London 2010
2. Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31: 743-758.
3. Albrechts, L. 2005. Creativity as a drive for change. Planning Theory, 4: 247-269.
4. Albrechts, L. 2006. Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38: 1149-1170.
5. Albrechts, L., Alden, J. and Da Rosa Pires, A. (Eds). 2001. The Changing Institutional Landscape of Planning, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.
6. Allmendinger, P. 2002. Planning Theory, 1st ed, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
7. Balducci, A. 2008. "Constructing (spatial) strategies in complex environments". In Empowering the Planning Fields: Ethics, Creativity and Action, Edited by: Van den Broeck, J., Moulaert, F. and Oosterlynck, S. 79-99. Acco: Leuven.
8. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, 1st ed, New York: Anchor Books.
9. Bezes, Ph. 2007. The hidden politics of administrative reform. Cutting French civil service wages with a low-profile instrument. Governance, 20: 23-56.
10. Bijker, W. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs. Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, 1st ed, Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Bogue, R. 2007. Deleuze's Way: Essays in Transverse Ethics and Aesthetics, Aldershot: Ashgate.
12. Booth, P., Breuillard, M., Fraser, C. and Paris, D. 2007. Spatial Planning Systems of Britain and France. A Comparative Analysis, 1st ed, Oxon: Routledge.
13. Böhme, K. and Waterhout, B. 2007. "The Europeanization of planning, in: A. Carbonell & A. Faludi (Eds)". In Gathering the Evidence - The Way Forward for European Planning?, 1-27. Luxembourg: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14. Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A. and Jacobs, W. 2007. A theory of institutional change: illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning. A, 39: 891-908.
15. Cars, G., Healey, P., Madanipour, A. and de Magalhaes, C. 2002. Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux, Aldershot: Ashgate.
16. CEC. 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
17. Cullingworth, B. and Nadin, V. 2005. Town and Country Planning in the UK, 13th ed, London: Routledge.
18. De Jong, M., Lalenis, K. and Mamadouh, V. 2002. The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transformation. Experiences with the Transfer of Policy Institutions, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. de Roo, G. 2001. Planning per se, planning per saldo. Over conflicten, complexiteit en besluitvorming in de milieuplanning, 3rd ed, Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
20. ESPON. 2007. Governance of territorial and urban policies from Eu to local level, project 2.3.2, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON
21. Fainstein, S. 2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35: 451-478.
22. Gonzalez, S. and Healey, P. 2005. A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies, 42: 2055-2069.
23. Goodin, R. 1996. "Institutions and their design". In The Theory of Institutional Design, Edited by: Goodin, R. 24-53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Gualini, E. 2001. Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions. Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-making between Institutional Design and Institution-building, Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. Guttenberg, A. 2009. Planning and ideology. Journal of Planning History, 8: 287-294.
26. Hajer, M. 2003. "A frame in the fields. Policy-making and the reinvention of politics". In Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society, 1 ed, Edited by: Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political studies, 44: 936-957.
28. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies, 1st ed, Hampshire and NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Healey, P. 1999. Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19: 111-122.
30. Healey, P. 2005. On the project of institutional transformation in the planning field. Commentary on the contributions. Planning theory, 4: 301-310.
31. Healey, P. 2007. "The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning". In Institutions and Planning, 1st ed, Edited by: Verma, N. 61-89. Oxford: Elsevier.
32. Healey, P., de Magalhaes, C., Madanipour, A. and Pendlebury, J. 2003. "Place, identity and local politics. Analysing initiatives in deliberative governance". In Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society, 1st ed, Edited by: Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. 60-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Healey, P., Khakee, A., Motte, A. and Needham, B. 1997. Making Strategic Spatial Plans. Innovation in Europe, London: UCL Press.
34. Hill, M. and Hupe, P. 2002. Implementing Public Policy, London: SAGE.
35. Hillier, J. 2010. "Strategic navigation in an ocean of theoretical and practice complexity". In The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Edited by: Hillier, J. and Healey, P. 447-480. Farnham: Ashgate.
36. Hillier, J. 2011. Strategic navigation across multiple planes: towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 82(5): 503-527.
37. Hommels, A. 2000. Obduracy and urban sociotechnical change. Changing plan Hoog Catharijne. Urban Affairs Review, 35: 649-676.
38. Innes, J. 1995. Planning theory's emerging paradigm. Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14: 183-189.
39. Janin, Rivolin, U. 2008. Conforming and performing planning Systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice and Research, 23(2): 167-186.
40. Jessop, B. 2001. Institutional (re)turns and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A, 33: 1213-1235.
41. Jessop, B. 2004. "Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance". In Multi-level Governance, Edited by: Bache, I. and Flinders, M. 49-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Jessop, B. 2008. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach, Cambridge: Polity Press.
43. Jessop, B. and Sum, N-L. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in Their Place, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
44. Jones, P. 2009. Putting architecture in its social place. A cultural political economy of architecture. Urban Studies, 46: 2519-2536.
45. Koelble, T. 1995. The new institutionalism in political science and sociology. Comparative Politics, 27: 231-243.
46. Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. 2007. Understanding public policy through its instruments. From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20: 1-21.
47. March, J. and Olsen, J. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: The Free Press.
48. Mazza, L. 2002. Technical knowledge and planning actions. Planning Theory, 1: 11-26.
49. Moulaert, F. 2005. Institutional economics and planning theory. A partnership between ostriches. Planning Theory, 4: 21-32.
50. Moulaert, F. 2009. "Social innovation. Institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced". In Social innovation and territorial development, Edited by: MacCallum, D. and F. Moulaert, J. Hillier & S. Vicari. 13-31. Farnham: Ashgate.
51. Moulaert, F. and Cabaret, K. 2006. Planning, networks and power relations. Is democratic planning under capitalism possible?. Planning Theory, 5: 51-70.
52. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Gonzalez, S. and Swyngedouw, E. 2007. Introduction: Social innovation and governance in European cities. Urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14: 195-209.
53. Moulaert, F. and Mehmood, A. 2009. "Spatial planning and institutional design. What can we expect from transaction cost economics?". In Handbook of International Urban policy, Edited by: Geyer, H. 199-211. Cheltenham: Edgar Algate.
54. Nadin, V. and Stead, D. 2008. European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP, 172: 35-47.
55. Palier, B. 2007. Tracking the evolution of a single instrument can reveal profound challenges. The case of funded pensions in France. Governance, 20: 85-107.
56. Peters, G. 2002. "The politics of tool choice". In The Tools of Government. A Guide to the New Governance, Edited by: Salamon, L. 552-564. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Peters, B. G. & Van Nispen, F. (Eds) (1998) Public Policy Instruments. Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing)
58. Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis, 1st ed, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
59. Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
60. Saey, P. 1988. De eerste generatie projecten van ruimtelijke ordening op macro-niveau in Vlaanderen Seminarie voor Menselijke en Ekonomische Aardrijkskunde
61. Saey, P. 1995a. Omtrent de maakbaarheid van de samenleving door de ruimtelijke planning. Deel 1: er is maakbaarheid en er is maakbaarheid. Planologisch Nieuws, 15: 159-167.
62. Saey, P. 1995b. Omtrent de maakbaarheid van de samenleving door ruimtelijke planning. Deel 2: ruimtelijke ordening als maatschappelijk gebeuren. Planologisch Nieuws, 15: 279-299.
63. Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis. Planning for Multicultural Cities, Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley.
64. Servillo, L. 2010. Territorial cohesion discourses: Hegemonic strategic concepts in European spatial planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3): 397-416.
65. Sum, N-L. (2008) Toward a Cultural Political Economy: Discourses, Material Power and (Counter-)Hegemony, DEMOLOGOS spot paper
66. Taylor, N. 2005. Urban Planning Theory Since 1945, London: Sage Publications.
67. Thelen, K. 2003. "How institutions evolve. Insights from comparative historical analysis". In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, 1st ed, Edited by: Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. 208-240. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
68. Turner, J. 1997. The Institutional Order, New York: Longman.
69. Van den Broeck, P. (2010) De sociale constructie van plannings-en projectinstrumenten. Onderzoek naar de socio-technische dynamiek in het 'Eerste Kwartier' in Antwerpen (The social construction of instruments for planning and development. Analysis of the socio-technical dynamics in the 'First Quarter' in Antwerp), Ph.D. thesis, Leuven, KU Leuven
70. Van den Broeck, P. 2011. "Analysing social innovation through planning instruments. A strategic-relational approach". In Strategic Projects, Catalysts for Change, Edited by: Oosterlynck, S. and J. Van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert & A. Verhetsel. 52-78. London and New York: Routledge.
71. Van den Heuvel. 2005. Beleidsinstrumenten. Sturingsinstrumenten voor het overheidsbeleid
72. Van Dijk, T. and Beunen, R. 2009. Laws, people and land use. A sociological perspective on the relation between laws and land use. European Planning Studies, 17: 1797-1815.
73. Verma, N. (Ed) (2007) Institutions and Planning (Oxford: Elsevier)
74. Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A. and Davoudi, S. 2000. Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
75. Winner, L. 1985. "Do artifacts have politics?". In The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd ed, Edited by: MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. 28-40. Buckingham: Open University Press.
76. Yiftachel, O., Little, J., Hedgcock, D. and Alexander, I. 2001. The Power of Planning. Spaces of Control and Transformation, 1st ed, Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.