A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity

Urban Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2055-2069

  González, Sara ^a,b   Healey, Patsy ^a  

^a Institute for Policy and Practice   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; METHODOLOGY; PLANNING HISTORY; POLICY ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS;

EID: 27544466338     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279778     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alexander, E. R. (1995) How Organisations Act Together: Interorganizational Co-ordination in Theory and Practice. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach.
2. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (2002) Cities: Re-imagining the Urban. Oxford: Polity/Blackwell.
3. Atkinson, R. and Moon, G. (1994) Urban Policy in Britain: The City, the State and the Market. London: Macmillan.
4. Bogason, P. (2000) Public Policy and Local Governance: Institutions in a Postmodern Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5. Brindley, T. (2000) Community roles in urban regeneration: new partnerships on London's South Bank, City, 4, pp. 363-377
6. Bryson, J. and Crosby, B. (1992) Leadership in the Common Good Tackling Public Problems in a Shared Power World. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
7. Burt, R. (2002) The social capital of structural holes, in: M. Guillén, P. Randall, P. England and M. Meyer (Eds) New Directions in Economic Sociology, pp. 148-192. New York: Russell Sage (http:// gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/ronald.burt/research/SCSH.pdf)
8. Cameron, S. (2003) Gentrification, housing redifferentiation and urban regeneration: 'going for growth' in Newcastle upon Tyne, Urban Studies, 40(12), pp. 2367-2382
9. Cars, G., Healey, P., Madanipour, A. and Magalhaes, C. de (Eds) (2002) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux. Aldershot: Ashgate.
10. Coaffee, J. and Healey, P. (2003) 'My voice: my place': tracking transformations in urban governance, Urban Studies, 40, pp. 1979-1999.
11. DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991) Introduction, in: W. W. Powell and P. J. Di Maggio (Eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 1-38. London: University of Chicago Press.
12. Dyrberg, T. B. (1997) The Circular Structure of Power. London: Verso.
13. Fainstein, S. (2000) New directions in planning theory, Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp. 451-476.
14. Fainstein, S. and Hirst, C. (1995) Urban Social Movements, in D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman (Eds) Theories of Urban Politics, pp. 181-204, London: Sage.
15. Faludi, A. (1987) A Decision-centred View of Environmental Planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
16. Fischer, F. (1995) Evaluating Public Policy. London: Sage.
17. Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press.
19. Fischler, R. (2000) Communicative planning theory: a Foucauldian assessment, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 358-368.
20. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. González Ceballos, S. (2002) Key concepts in the 'new institutionalism approach', the context of urban regeneration strategies, in: J. van Dijk et al. (Eds) Urban Regions: Governing Interacting Economic, Housing and Transport Systems, pp. 139-153. Utrecht: Netherlands Geographical Studies.
22. González Ceballos, S. (2003) The politics of scale in Bilbao: the socio-political construction of a metropolitan area. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of the Basque Country (in Spanish).
23. Gualini, E. (2001) Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions. Aldershot: Ashgate.
24. Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. (Eds) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hall, P. and Taylor, R. (1996) Political science and the three institutionalisms, Political Studies, 44, pp. 936-957.
27. Harding, A. (2000) Regime formation in Manchester and Edinburgh, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance, pp. 54-71. Houndmills: Macmillan.
28. Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the formation of urban governance in late capitalism, Geografisker Annaler, 71B, pp. 3-17.
29. Healey, P. (1997a) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
30. Healey, P. (1997b) Mandarins, city fathers and neighbours: crossing old divides in new partnerships, in: O. Kalltorp., I. Elander, O. Ericsson and M. Franzen (Eds) Cities in Transformation: Transformation in Cities, pp. 166-168. Aldershot: Avebury.
31. Healey, P. (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1531-1456.
32. Healey, P. (1999) Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning and shaping places, Journal of Planning and Environment Research, 19, pp. 111-122.
33. Healey, P. (2002) On creating the 'city' as a collective resource, Urban Studies, 39, pp. 1777-1792.
34. Healey, P. (2004) Creativity and urban governance, Policy Studies, 25(2), pp. 87-102
35. Healey, P., Magalhaes, C. de, Madanipour, A. and Pendlebury, J. (2003) Place, identity and local politics: analysing partnership initiatives, in: M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (Eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, pp. 60-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Healey, P., McNamara, P., Elson, M. and Doak. J. (1988) Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hill, D. (2000) Urban Policy and Politics in Britain. London: Macmillan.
38. Hillier, J. (2000) Going round the back: complex networks and informal action in local planning processes, Environment and Planning A. 32, pp. 33-54.
39. Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land Use Planning. London: Routledge.
40. Huxley, M. (1994) Planning as a framework of power: utilitarian reform, Enlightenment logic and the control of urban space, in: S. Ferber, C. Healy and C. McAuliffe (Eds) Beasts of Suburbia: Reinterpreting Cultures in Australian Suburbs, pp. 94-110. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press,
41. Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. (1999) Consensusbuilding and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, pp. 412-423.
42. Innes, J. and Booher, D. (2003) Collaborative policy-making: governance through dialogue, in M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (Eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, pp. 33-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Jensen, O. and Richardson, T. (2000) Discourses of mobility and polycentric development: a contested view of European spatial planning, European Planning Studies, 8, pp. 503-520.
44. Jensen, O. B. and Richardson, T. (2004) Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity. London: Routledge.
45. Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
46. Jessop, B. (1997) The entrepreneurial city: re-imagining localities, re-designing economic governance or re-structuring capital?, in: N. Jewson and S. MacGregor (Eds) Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions, pp. 28-42. London: Routledge
47. Jessop, B. (2000) Governance failure, in G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Politics of Local Governance, pp. 11-32. London: Macmillan.
48. Jessop, B. (2001) Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 1213-1235.
49. John, P. (1998) Analysing Public Policy. London: Pinter.
50. Le Galès, P. (2002) European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Lipietz, A. (1994) The national and the regional: their autonomy vis-à-vis the capitalist world crisis, in: R. Palan and B. Gills (Eds) Transcending the State-Global Divide, pp. 23-43. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
52. Lowndes, V. (2001) Rescuing Aunt Sally: taking institutional theory seriously in urban politics, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 1953-1972.
53. Mayer, M. (2000) Social movements in European cities: transitions from the 1970s to the 1990s, in: A. Bagnasco and P. Le Galès (Eds) Cities in Contemporary Europe, pp. 131-152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Muller, P. and Surel, Y. (1998) L'analyse des politiques publiques. Paris: Montchrestien.
55. Murdoch, J. and Abram, S. (2002) Rationalities of Planning: Development versus Environment in Planning for Housing. Aldershot: Ashgate.
56. Painter, J. and Goodwin, M. (2000) Local government after Fordism, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance, pp. 33-53. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
57. Peters, G. (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The 'New Institutionalism'. London: Continuum.
58. Pickvance, C. (2003) From urban social movements to urban movements: a review and an introduction to a symposium on urban movements, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, pp. 102-109.
59. Raco, M. (1999) Competition, collaboration and the new industrial districts: examining the institutional turn in local economic development, Urban Studies, 36, pp. 951-968.
60. Raco, M. (2002) Assessing the discourses and practices of urban regeneration in a growing region, Geoforum, 34, pp. 37-55.
61. Richardson, T. (1997) The trans-European transport network: environmental policy integration in the European Union, European Urban and Regional Studies, 4, pp. 333-346.
62. Richardson, T. and Jensen, O. (2003) Linking discourse and space: towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses, Urban Studies, 40, pp. 7-22.
63. Roo, G. De (2000) Environmental conflicts in compact cities: complexity, decision-making and policy approaches, Environment and Planning B, 27, pp. 151-162.
64. Sager, T. (1994) Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Avebury.
65. Sager, T. (2001) Positive theory of planning: the social choice approach, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 629-647.
66. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
67. Schon, D. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
68. Tarrow, O. (1994) Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1996) The institutionalisation of institutional theory, in: S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (Eds) Handbook of Organisation Studies, pp. 175-190, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Vigar, G. (2001) The Politics of Mobility. London: Routledge.
71. Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A. and Davoudi, S. (2000) Planning, governance and spatial strategy in Britain. London: Macmillan.
72. Webster, C. and Lai, L. (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
73. Wood, A., Valler, D. and North, P. (1998) Local business representation and the private sector role in local economic policy in Britain, Local Economy, 13, pp. 10-27.
74. Wood, R., Handley, J. and Kidd, S. (1999) Sustainable development and institutional design: the example of the Mersey Basin Campaign, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42, pp. 341-354.
75. Yanow, D. (1996) How Does a Policy Mean? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
76. Zonneveld, W. (2000) Discursive aspects of strategic planning: a deconstruction of the 'balanced competitiveness' concept in European spatial planning, in: W. Salet and A. Faludi (Eds) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 267-280. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.