Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 189-198

  Krantz, Oskar ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Agency; Assistive technology; Disability; MPT (Matching Person and Technology); ValMO (Value and Meaning in Human Occupations)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; ENERGY METABOLISM; HUMAN; SELF HELP; SOCIAL STIGMA; SWEDEN; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SELF-HELP DEVICES; SOCIAL STIGMA; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84859529926     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.618212     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Rybarczyk B, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Cash SM, Kaiser J. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabilitation psychology 1995; 40: 95-110.
2. Chaves ES, Boninger ML, Cooper R, Fitzgerald SG, Gray DB, Cooper RA. Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perceptionof participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1854-1858. (Pubitemid 39441144)
3. Sjödahl Hammarlund C. Gait re-education in transfemoral amputees [doctoral dissertation]. Lund, Sweden; 2004. 58 p. Lund university,Faculty of medicine, Department of physiotherapy. Available from: http: //www.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id=12588&postid=466765
4. Krantz O. Social construction of technical aids. Personal meaning and interactional effects of disability and assistive devices in everyday life [doctoral dissertation]. Lund, Sweden; 2009. 226p. Lund university, Faculty of medicine, Department of health sciences. Doctoral dissertation series 2009: 23. Available from: http: //www.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id=12588&postid=1296117
5. Goffman E. Stigma. London: Penguin books Ltd; 1990.
6. Wendell S. Unhealthy disabled: treating chronic illnesses as disabilities. Hypatia 2001; 16: 17-33.
7. Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabilitation psychology 2005; 50: 132-141. (Pubitemid 40770594)
8. Watson N, Woods B. No wheelchairs beyond this point: a historical examination of wheelchair access in the twentieth century in Britain and America. Social policy & society 2005; 4: 97-105.
9. Bergström AL, Samuelsson K. Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2006; 1: 175-182.
10. Krantz O, Edberg AK, Persson D. The experience of active wheelchair provision and aspects of importance concerning the wheelchair among experienced users in Sweden. Review of disability studies 2011; (Accepted for publication).
11. Cooper RA. Wheelchair selection and configuration. USA: Demos; 1998.
12. Lutz BJ, Bowers BJ. Disability in everyday life. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1037-1054. (Pubitemid 41419468)
13. Gallagher P. Introduction to the special issue on psychosocial perspectives on amputation and prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 827-830. (Pubitemid 39089227)
14. Shakespeare T. Review article: disability studies today and tomorrow. Sociol Health Illn 2005; 27: 138-148. (Pubitemid 40576967)
15. WHO International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO Library cataloguing-in-publication data; 2001.
16. Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn 2004; 26: 287-305. (Pubitemid 38515611)
17. Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 1851-1862. (Pubitemid 30155511)
18. Larsson Lund M. Nygard L. Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: different approaches to achieving a desired occupational selfimage. OTJR: Occupation, participation and health 2003; 23: 67-75. (Pubitemid 36433905)
19. Kyberd PJ, Light C, Chappell PH, Nightingale JM, Whatley D, Evans M. The design of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a study of the Southampton hand. Robotica 2001; 19: 593-600. (Pubitemid 34011243)
20. Scherer MJ, Cushman LA. Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 387-393. (Pubitemid 32496148)
21. Scherer MJ, Cushman LA. Determining the content for an interactive training programme and interpretive guidelines for the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 126-130. (Pubitemid 34105684)
22. Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 1-4. (Pubitemid 34105672)
23. Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer JV. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 1321-1331. (Pubitemid 41823742)
24. Sandywell B. The myth of everyday life. Toward a heterology of the ordinary. In memoriam Steven A. Crook (1950-2002). Cultural studies 2004: 2-3: 160-180. (Pubitemid 39347832)
25. Shields R. A resuméof everyday life. Space and culture 2002; 5: 4-8.
26. Burkitt I. The time and space of everyday life. Cultural studies 2004; 18(2/3): 211-227. (Pubitemid 39347835)
27. Bourdieu P. Distinction. Great Britain: Routledge; 1984.
28. Bourdieu P. Kultursociologiska texter. Stockholm/Skåne: Brutus Östlings bokförlag symposion AB; 1991.
29. Bourdieu P. Kultur och kritik. Uddevalla: Daidalos; 1992.
30. Gething L. Judgements by health professionals of personal characteristics of people with a visible physical disability. Soc Sci Med1992; 34: 809-815.
31. Duedahl P. Perspectives: outcasts after all? Scandinavian journal of disability research 2005; 7(3/4): 220-228.
32. Edwards C, Imrie R. Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology 2003; 37: 239-256. (Pubitemid 36614294)
33. Lipson JG, Rogers JG. Cultural aspects of disability. J Transcult Nurs 2000; 11: 212-219.
34. Taub DE, McLorg PA, Fanflik PL. Stigma management strategies among women with physical disabilities: contrasting approaches of downplaying or claiming a disability status. Deviant behavior 2004; 25: 169-190.
35. Yang LH, Kleinman A, Link BG, Phelan JC, Lee S, Good B. Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 1524-1535. (Pubitemid 46349382)
36. Shildrik M, Price J. Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body & society 1996; 2: 93-113.
37. Asbring P, Närvänen AL. Women's experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 2002; 12: 148-160.
38. Taleporos G, McCabe MP. The impact of physical disability on body esteem. Sexuality and disability 2001; 19: 293-308. (Pubitemid 33743599)
39. Gannon B, Nolan B. The impact of disability transitions on social inclusion. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 1425-1437. (Pubitemid 46349388)
40. Breakey JW. Body image: the inner mirror. Journal of prosthetics and orthotics 1997; 9: 107-112. (Pubitemid 128008610)
41. Ramachandran VS. Consciousness and body image: lessons from phantom limbs, Capgras syndrome and pain asymbolia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 1998; 353: 1851-1859. (Pubitemid 28537292)
42. Flannery JC, Faria SH. Limb loss: alterations in body image. J Vasc Nurs 1999; 17: 100-6; quiz 107.
43. Desmond D, MacLachalan M. Psychosocial issues in the field of prosthetics and orthotics. Journal of prosthetics and orthotics 2002; 1: 19-22. (Pubitemid 41638414)
44. Cash TF. Body image: past, present, and future. Body Image 2004; 1: 1-5. (Pubitemid 40105789)
45. Pruzinsky T, Cash TF. Understanding body images: historical and contemporary perspectives. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford press; 2004. p. 3-12.
46. Rudiger JA, Cash TF, Roehrig M, Thompson JK. Day-to-day bodyimage states: prospective predictors of intra-individual level and variability. Body Image 2007; 4: 1-9.
47. Yuen HK, Hanson C. Body image and exercise in people with and without acquired mobility disability. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 289-296. (Pubitemid 34467521)
48. Price EH. A critical review of reports and theories of phantom limbs amongst congenitally limb-deficient subjects and a proposed theory for the developmental origins of body image. Consciousness and cognition 2006; 15: 310-322.
49. Persson D, Erlandsson LK, Eklund M, Iwarsson S. Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation? a tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy 2001; 8: 7-18. (Pubitemid 32618634)
50. Erlandsson LK, Persson D. Brott och smutstvätt? en betraktelse av vardagens sysslor genom en litterär lins. In: Perspektiver på aktivitetsvidenskab? en antologi. Copenhagen, Denmark: FADL; 2005.
51. Sirkka M, Brännholm IB. Consequences of a hip fracture in activity performance and life satisfaction in an elderly Swedish clientele. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy 2003; 10: 34-39. (Pubitemid 36395290)
52. Wilson AB. A primer on limb prosthetics. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas publisher ltd; 1998.
53. Eftring H. The useworthiness of robots for people with physical disabilities [doctoral dissertation]. Lund, Sweden; 1999. 188 p. Lund University, Department of design sciences, Division of rehabilitation engineering research. Doctoral dissertation series 1999: 1. Available from: http: //www.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id = 12588&postid = 19270
54. Pillet J, Didierjean-Pillet A. Aesthetic hand prosthesis: gadget or therapy? Presentation of a new classification. J Hand Surg Br 2001; 26: 523-528. (Pubitemid 34149922)
55. Krantz O, Bolin K, Persson D. Stigma-handling strategies in everyday life among women aged 20 to 30 with transversal upper limb reduction deficiency. Scandinavian journal of disability research 2009; 10: 209-226.
56. Hallström I, Elander G. A comparison of patient needs as ranked by patients and nurses. Scand J Caring Sci 2001; 15: 228-234. (Pubitemid 34205877)
57. Maslow AH. Preface to motivation theory. Psychosomatic medicine 1943; 5: 85-92.
58. Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review 1943; 50: 370-396.
59. Wahba MA, Bridwell LG. Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational behavior and human performance 1976; 15: 212-240.
60. Rowan J. Ascent and descent in Maslow's theory. Journal of humanistic psychology 1999; 39: 125-133.
61. Koltko-Rivera ME. Rediscovering the later version of Maslow's hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of general psychology 2006; 10: 302-317.
62. Tsukamoto Y. Pinpointing of an upper limb prosthesis. Journal of prosthetics and orthotics 2000; 12: 5-6.
63. Lestel D, Grundmann E. Tools, techniques and animals: the role of mediations of actions in the dynamics of social behaviours. Social science information 1999; 38: 367-407.
64. Beck B. Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. New York: Garland STPM press; 1980.
65. Rodenbeck E. No man's land: bodies and technology in the first world war [Internet]. New York, USA; 1995 - [cited 2004-11-15]; Available from: http: //eric.stamen.com/ww1/nomans/nomansland.pdf
66. ISO 9999: 2007 Assistive products for persons with disability? classification and terminology (4th ed.) [Internet]. Solna, Sweden: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet (The Swedish handicap institute). 2007 [cited 2009 May 11]. Available from: http: //www.hi.se/