Disability in everyday life

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1037-1054

  Lutz, Barbara J ^a   Bowers, Barbara J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual model; Disability; Person centered; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; COPING BEHAVIOR; COST OF ILLNESS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EXPERIENCE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONG TERM CARE; MODEL; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; WISCONSIN;

EID: 26444462109     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305278631     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brandt, E. N., & Pope, A. M. (1997). Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy.
2. Burns, T. J., Batavia, A. I., Smith, Q. W., & DeJong, G. (1990). Primary health care needs of persons with physical disabilities: What are the research and service priorities? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71(2), 138-143.
3. Caron, C. D., & Bowers, B. J. (2000). Methods and application of dimensional analysis: A contribution to concept and knowledge development in nursing. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 285-319). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
4. Chermak, G. D. (1990). A global perspective on disability: A review of efforts to increase access and advance social integration for persons with disabilities. International Disability Studies, 12(3), 123-127.
5. Davidoff, C., Schultz, S., Lieb, T., Andrews, K., Wardner, J., Hayes, C., et al. (1990). Rehospitalization after initial rehabilitation for acute spinal cord injury: Incidence and risk factors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71(2), 121-124.
6. DeJong, G., & Brannon, R. (1998). Trends in services directed to working-age people with physical disabilities. In V. Mor (Ed.), Living in the community with disability: Services needs, uses, and systems (pp. 168-194). New York: Springer.
7. DeJong, G., Palsbo, S. E., Beatty, P. W., Jones, G. C. Kroll, T. & Neri, M. T. (2002). The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities, Millbank Quarterly, 80(2), 261-301.
8. Department of Health and Human Services, P. H. S. (2000). Healthy people 2010 (Conference ed., Vol. 1). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. Finkelstein, V. (1993). Disability: A social challenge or an administrative responsibility? In M. Oliver (Ed.), Disabling barriers - Enabling environments (pp. 34-43). London: Sage.
10. Fujiura, G. T. (2001). Emerging trends in disability. Population Today, 29(6), 9-10.
11. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
12. Hockenberry, J. (1995). Moving violations: War zones, wheelchairs, and declarations of independence. New York: Hyperion.
13. Hurst, R. (2000). To revise or not to revise? Disability and Society, 15(7), 1083-1087.
14. Hurst, R. (2003). The international disability rights movement and the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(11/12), 572-576.
15. Imrie, R. (2004). Demystifying disability: A review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26(3), 287-305.
16. Kools, S., McCarthy, M., Durham, R., & Robrecht, L. (1996). Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 312-330.
17. Leutz, W., Sciegaj, M., & Capitman, J. (1997). Client-centered case management: A survey of state programs. Journal of Case Management, 6(1), 18-24.
18. Lutz, B. J., & Bowers, B. J. (2003). Understanding how disability is defined and conceptualized in the literature. Rehabilitation Nursing, 28(3), 74-78.
19. Mairs, N. (1996). Waist high in the world: Life among the non-disabled. Boston: Beacon.
20. Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19, 85-91.
21. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
22. Morris, J. (Ed.). (1989). Able lives: Women's experiences of paralysis. London: Women's Press.
23. Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4) 1-16.
24. Nagi, S. Z. (1965) Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M. B. Sussman (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation (pp. 100-113). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
25. Nagi, S. Z. (1991) Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309-327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. National Organization on Disability (NOD). (2004, June 25). Landmark disability survey finds pervasive disadvantages. Retrieved July 17, 2004, from http:///www.nod.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.viewPage&pageID= 1430&nodeID=1&FeatureID=1422&redirected=1&CFID= 2673961&CFTOKEN=88505582
27. O'Day, B., Palsbo, S. E., Dhont, K. & Scheer, J. (2002). Health plan selection criteria by people with impaired mobility, Medical Care, 40(9), 739-742.
28. Pope, A. M., & Tarlov, A. R. (Eds.). (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Reeve, C. (1998). Still me. New York: Random House.
30. Robillard, A. B. (1999). Meaning of disability: The lived experience of paralysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31. Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 303-314). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
32. Shalin, D. N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review, 51, 9-29.
33. Tregaskis, C. (2002). Social model theory: The story so far ... Disability and Society, 17(4), 457-470.
34. Ueda, S., & Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(11/12), 596-601.
35. Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994) The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38(1), 1-14.
36. World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
37. World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health: ICF. Retrieved August 8, 2003, from http://www3.who.int/icf/beginners/bg.pdf