Evidence-based periodontal plastic surgery. II. An individual data meta-analysis for evaluating factors in achieving complete root coverage

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 477-490

  Chambrone, Leandro ^a,b   Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes ^a   Tu, Yu Kang ^c   Chambrone, Luiz Armando ^b  

^a GUARULHOS UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b Section of Oral Pathology   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Connective tissue; Evidence based dentistry; Gingival recession; Meta analysis; Surgical flaps

Indexed keywords

ENAMEL MATRIX PROTEINS; ENAMEL PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY; GINGIVA; GINGIVA DISEASE; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH ROOT; TRANSPLANTATION;

CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 84859487919     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.110382     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects? J Dent 2008;36:659-671.
2. Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. The influence of tobacco smoking on the outcomes achieved by root-coverage procedures: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:294-306.
3. Chambrone L, Lima LA, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA. Systematic review of periodontal plastic surgery in the treatment of multiple recession-type defects. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75:203a-203f.
4. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araú jo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession-type defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD007161.
5. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araú jo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: A Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol 2010;81: 452-478.
6. Chambrone L, Faggion CM Jr., Pannuti CM, Chambrone LA. Evidence-based periodontal plastic surgery: An assessment of quality of systematic reviews in the treatment of recession-type defects. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:1110-1118.
7. Chambrone LA, Chambrone L. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of multiple recessiontype defects. J Periodontol 2006;77:909-916. (Pubitemid 44740649)
8. Chambrone LA, Chambrone L. Treatment of Miller Class I and II localized recession defects using laterally positioned flaps: A 24-month study. Am J Dent 2009;22:339-344.
9. Oates TW, Robinson M, Gunsolley JC. Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:303-320.
10. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Needleman I, Sanz M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(Suppl. 3):178-194, discussion 195-196. (Pubitemid 41719451)
11. Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Basso M, Weinstein RL. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: A 1- year prospective study. J Periodontol 2005;76:899-907. (Pubitemid 40903830)
12. Nieri M, Rotundo R, Franceschi D, Cairo F, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Factors affecting the outcome of the coronally advanced flap procedure: A Bayesian network analysis. J Periodontol 2009;80:405-410.
13. Janes H, Pepe MS. Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: An old concept in a new setting. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:89-97. (Pubitemid 351881892)
14. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Exploring between study heterogeneity. In: Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000:87-108.
15. Bennett DA. Review of analytical methods for prospective cohort studies using time to event data: Single studies and implications for meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 2003;12:297-319. (Pubitemid 36992597)
16. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.1 (updated September 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration. 2008. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed November 15, 2008.
17. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):8-13.
18. Chambrone L, Pannuti CM, Guglielmetti MR, Chambrone LA. Evidence grade associating periodontitis with preterm birth and/or low birth weight. II. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating the effects of periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:902-914.
19. Whitehead A. Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 2003;99-150, 241-258.
20. Côrtes AdeQ, Martins AG, Nociti FH Jr., Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Sallum EA. Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of Class I gingival recessions: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2004;75:1137-1144. (Pubitemid 39302463)
21. de Queiroz Côrtes A, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum EA. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:683-689. (Pubitemid 44195422)
22. Bittencourt S, Del Peloso Ribeiro E, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH Jr., Casati MZ. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol 2006;77:174-181. (Pubitemid 44725068)
23. Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH Jr., Casati MZ. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: A 30-month follow-up study. J Periodontol 2009;80:1076-1082.
24. Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr., Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba MJ, Palioto DB. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix. J Periodontol 2004;75:1350-1356. (Pubitemid 39517373)
25. Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr., Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba M Jr., Palioto DB. New surgical approach for root coverage of localized gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix: A 12-month comparative clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:156-164, discussion 164.
26. Roccuzzo M, Lungo M, Corrente G, Gandolfo S. Comparative study of a bioresorbable and a non-resorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal gingival recessions. J Periodontol 1996;67:7-14. (Pubitemid 126613536)
27. Jepsen K, Heinz B, Halben JH, Jepsen S. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol 1998;69:383-391. (Pubitemid 128531941)
28. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Roccuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000;71: 1693-1698.
29. Henderson RD, Greenwell H, Drisko C, et al. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft. J Periodontol 2001;72:571-582. (Pubitemid 33606323)
30. Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein RL. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:583-593.
31. Woodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Iasella JM, Scheetz J. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone. J Periodontol 2004;75:44-56. (Pubitemid 38312769)
32. Del Pizzo M, Zucchelli G, Modica F, Villa R, Debernardi C. Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: A 2-year study. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:1181-1187. (Pubitemid 41499477)
33. Lins LH, de Lima AF, Sallum AW. Root coverage: Comparison of coronally positioned flap with and without titanium-reinforced barrier membrane. J Periodontol 2003;74:168-174. (Pubitemid 36322270)
34. da Silva RC, Joly JC, de Lima AF, Tatakis DN. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2004;75:413-419. (Pubitemid 38476891)
35. Matarasso S, Cafiero C, Coraggio F, Vaia E, de Paoli S. Guided tissue regeneration versus coronally repositioned flap in the treatment of recession with double papillae. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18: 444-453.
36. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2000;71:299-307.
37. Rosetti EP, Marcantonio RA, Rossa C Jr., Chaves ES, Goissis G, Marcantonio E Jr. Treatment of gingival recession: Comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 2000;71:1441-1447.
38. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: Comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:287-293. (Pubitemid 40462662)
39. Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Healing of gingival recessions using a collagen membrane with a hemineralized xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:59-67.
40. Haghighati F, Mousavi M, Moslemi N, Kebria MM, Golestan B. A comparative study of two root-coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:179-189.
41. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. J Periodontol 2010;81:1108-1117.
42. Banihashemrad A, Aghassizadeh E, Radvar M. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap. N Y State Dent J 2009;75:54-58.
43. Mazzocco F, Comuzzi L, Stefani R, Milan Y, Favero G, Stellini E. Coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft using full or partial thickness flap reflection. J Periodontol 2011; 82:1524-1529.
44. Nazareth CA, Cury PR. Use of anorganic bovinederived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide (P-15) in the treatment isolated Class I gingival recession of defects: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2011; 82:700-707.
45. Clauser C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Pagliaro U, Pini- Prato G. Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 2. Ordinary and individual patient data meta-analyses of surgical treatment of recession using complete root coverage as the outcome variable. J Periodontol 2003;74:741-756. (Pubitemid 36701387)
46. Pini-Prato G. The Miller classification of gingival recession: Limits and drawbacks. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:243-245.
47. Pini Prato GP, Baldi C, Nieri M, et al. Coronally advanced flap: The post-surgical position of the gingival margin is an important factor for achieving complete root coverage. J Periodontol 2005;76:713-722. (Pubitemid 40852383)
48. Freedman DA, Klein SP, Ostland M, Roberts MR. Review of a solution to the ecological inference problem. J Am Stat Assoc 1998;93:1518-1522.
49. Greenland S. Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1343-1350. (Pubitemid 34134288)
50. Nieri M, Clauser C, Pagliaro U, PiniPrato G. Individual patient data: A criterion in grading articles dealing with therapy outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2003;3: 122-126. (Pubitemid 37220183)
51. Lyman GH, Kuderer NM. The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:14.
52. Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Van Geloven N, et al. Are patient characteristics associated with the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal pathology? An individual patient data meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:293-300.
53. Janssen KJ, Donders AR, Harrell FE Jr., et al. Missing covariate data in medical research: To impute is better than to ignore. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:721-727.
54. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Stat Med 1999;18:2693-2708. (Pubitemid 29481404)
55. Turner RM, Omar RZ, Yang M, Goldstein H, Thompson SG. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med 2000;19:3417-3432. (Pubitemid 32056694)
56. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: Multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 2002;21:589-624. (Pubitemid 34141379)
57. Bagos PG. Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: Comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature. BMC Genet 2011;12:8.
58. Stewart LA, Tierney JF. To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Eval Health Prof 2002; 25:76-97. (Pubitemid 34157785)