Preparation of mixed-matrix membranes for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration based on response surface methodology

Desalination

Volumn 293, Issue , 2012, Pages 7-20

  Ngang, H P ^a   Ahmad, A L ^a   Low, S C ^a   Ooi, B S ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Central composite design; Methylene blue; Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration; Optimization; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

CASTING THICKNESS; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; EXPERIMENTAL VALUES; INTERACTIVE EFFECT; MEMBRANE CASTING; METHYLENE BLUE; MICELLAR ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION; MUTUAL INTERACTION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PERMEATION FLUXES; PHASE INVERSION TECHNIQUES; POLYMER CONCENTRATIONS; POLYVINYLIDENE FLUORIDES; PVDF MEMBRANE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; TIO;

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; MEMBRANES; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

PERMEATION;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MATRIX; METHODOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; PHASE TRANSITION; POLYMER; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84859481751     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bielska M., Szymanowski J. Removal of methylene blue from waste water using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Water Res. 2006, 40:1027-1033.
2. Wang S., Zhu Z.H., Coomes A., Haghseresht F., Lu G.Q. The physical and surface chemical characteristics of activated carbons and the adsorption of methylene blue from wastewater. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 284:440-446.
3. Golob V., Vinder A., Simonic M. Efficiency of the coagulation/flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents. Dyes Pigm. 2005, 67:93-97.
4. Seshadri S., Bishop P.L., Agha A.M. Anaerobic/aerobic treatment of selected azo dyes in waste water. Waste Manag. 1994, 15:127-137.
5. Sarkar B., DasGupta S., De S. Application of external electric field to enhance the permeate flux during micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66:263-272.
6. Xiarchos I., Jaworska A., Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface methodology for the modelling of copper removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 321:222-231.
7. Koyuncu I., Topacik D., Yuksel E. Reuse of reactive dyehouse wastewater by nanofiltration: process water quality and economical implications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 36:77-85.
8. Choi J.G., Bae T.H., Kim J.H., Tak T.M., Randall A.A. The behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the crossflow membrane bioreactor system. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203:103-113.
9. 2 nanoparticles with UV irradiation for modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313:158-169.
10. 2 nanoparticle size on the performance of PVDF membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253:2003-2010.
11. 2 nanowire addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. Desalination 2011, 272:90-97.
12. 2 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 249:76-84.
13. 2 particles under UV irradiation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 303:221-233.
14. 2 nanoparticles on fouling mitigation of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 249:1-8.
15. Singh K.P., Gupta S., Singh A.K., Sinha S. Optimizing adsorption of crystal violet dye from water by magnetic nanocomposite using response surface modeling approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186:1462-1473.
16. Rigas F. Statistical Design of Experiments and Optimization of Industrial Processes 1986, NTUA Press, Athens, (in Greek).
17. Khayet M., Seman M.N.A., Hilal N. Response surface modeling and optimization of composite nanofiltration modified membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 349:113-122.
18. Ahmad A.L., Low S.C., Shukor S.R.A., Ismail A. Optimization of membrane performance by thermal-mechanical stretching process using responses surface methodology (RSM). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66:177-186.
19. Ismail A.F., Lai P.Y. Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40:191-207.
20. Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methods and Other Approaches to Process Optimization Design and Analysis of Experiments 2001, 427. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 5th edition.
21. Mosqueda-Jimenez D.B., Narbaitz R.M., Matsuura T., Chowdhury G., Pleizier G., Santerre J.P. Influence of processing conditions on the properties of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:209-224.
22. Bakeri G., Ismail A.F., Shariaty-Niassar M., Matsuura T. Effect of polymer concentration on the structure and performance of polyetherimide hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:103-111.
23. See-Toh Y.H., Ferreira F.C., Livingston A.G. The influence of membrane formation parameters ont he functional performance of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 209:236-250.
24. Vogrin N., Stropnik C., Musil V., Brumen M. The wet phase separation: the effect of cast solution thickness on the appearance of macrovoids in the membrane forming ternary cellulose acetate/acetone/water system. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 207:139-141.
25. 2 entrapped PVDF membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172:1321-1328.
26. 2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:73-84.
27. Han L.-F., Xu Z.-L., Yu L.-Y., Wei Y.-M., Cao Y. Performance of PVDF/multi-nanoparticles composite hollow fibre ultrafiltration membranes. Iran. Polym. J. 2010, 19:553-565.
28. Mulder M. Basic Principle of Membrane Technology 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
29. Azari S., Karimi M., Kish M.H. Structural properties of the poly(acrylonitrile) membrane prepared with different cast thicknesses. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:2442-2448.
30. Kim I.C., Lee K.H., Tak T.M. Preparation and characterization of integrally skinned uncharged polyetherimide asymmetric nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 183:235-247.
31. Witte P.v.d., Dijkstra P.J., Berg J.W.A.v.d., Feijen J. Review: phase separation processes in polymer solution in relation to membrane formation. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117:1-31.
32. Yuliwati E., Ismail A.F. Effect of additives concentration on the surface properties and performance of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes for refinery produced wastewater treatment. Desalination 2011, 273:226-234.
33. 2 composite membranes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254:7080-7086.
34. 2 organic-inorganic composite membranes for fouling resistance improvement. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345:13-20.