Response surface modeling and optimization of composite nanofiltration modified membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 349, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 113-122

  Khayet, M ^a   Seman, M N Abu ^b   Hilal, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Central composite design; Humic acid; Membrane modification; Nanofiltration; Optimization; Response surface methodology; UV

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; COMPOSITE NANOFILTRATION; CONCENTRATION OF; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION APPROACH; DIP METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEED SOLUTION; FLUX RATIO; GRAFT POLYMERIZATION; GRAFTED MEMBRANES; HUMIC ACID; INDEPENDENT PARAMETERS; MEMBRANE MODIFICATION; MODEL SOLUTION; MODIFIED MEMBRANES; MONOMER CONCENTRATION; N-VINYL-2-PYRROLIDONE; NANOFILTRATION PERFORMANCE; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; OPTIMAL POINTS; OPTIMUM OPERATING CONDITIONS; OUTPUT RESPONSE; PERMEATE FLUX; PH VALUE; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PURE WATER; QUADRATIC MODELS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS; SIGNIFICANT FACTORS; SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION; UV IRRADIATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; DESIGN; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); IRRADIATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; MONOMERS; NANOFILTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; ORGANIC ACIDS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

1 VINYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; HUMIC ACID; MONOMER;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

EID: 74649083089     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.031     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Khayet M., and Mengual J.I. Effect of salt concentration during the treatment of humic acid solutions by membrane distillation. Desalination 168 (2004) 373-381
2. Khayet M., Velázquez A., and Mengual J.I. Direct contact membrane distillation of humic acid solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 240 (2004) 123-128
3. Chennamsetty R., and Escobar I. Evolution of polysulfone nanofiltration membrane following ion beam irradiation. Langmuir 24 (2008) 5569-5579
4. Chen H., and Belfort G. Surface modification of poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes by low-temperature plasma-induced graft polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 72 (1999) 1699-1711
5. Ulbricht M., and Belfort G. Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by low temperature plasma II. Graft polymerization onto polyacrylonitrile and polysulfone. J. Membr. Sci. 111 (1996) 193-215
6. Turan E., and Caykara T. Swelling and network parameters of pH-sensitive poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 106 (2007) 2000-2007
7. Freger V., Gilron J., and Belfer S. TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 283-292
8. Qiu C., Nguyen Q.T., and Ping Z. Surface modification of cardo polyetherketone ultrafiltration membrane by photo-grafted copolymers to obtain nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 295 (2007) 88-94
9. Yusof A.H.M., and Ulbricht M. Polypropylene-based membrane adsorbers via photo-initiated graft copolymerization: optimizing separation performance by preparation conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 294-305
10. Hilal N., Al-Khatib L., Atkin B.P., Kochkodan V., and Potapchenko N. Photochemical modification of membrane surfaces for (bio)fouling reduction: a nano-scale study using AFM. Desalination 158 (2003) 65-72
11. Uyama Y., Kato K., and Ikada Y. Surface modification of polymers by grafting. Adv. Polym. Sci. 137 (1998) 1-39
12. Taniguchi M., and Belfort G. Low protein fouling synthetic membranes by UV-assisted surface grafting modification: varying monomer type. J. Membr. Sci. 231 (2004) 147-157
13. Pieracci J., Wood D.W., Crivello J.V., and Belfort G. UV-assisted graft polymerization of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone onto Poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes: comparison of dip versus immersion modification techniques. Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 2123-2133
14. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Pieracci J.P., and Belfort G. Photochemical modification of poly(ether sulfone) and sulfonated poly(sulfone) nanofiltration membranes for control of fouling by natural organic matter. Desalination 132 (2000) 133-142
15. Susanto H., and Ulbricht M. High-performance thin-layer hydrogel composite membranes for ultrafiltration of natural organic. Water Res. 42 (2008) 2827-2835
16. Susanto H., Arafat H., Janssen E.M.L., and Ulbricht M. Ultrafiltration of polysaccharide-protein mixtures: elucidation of fouling mechanisms and fouling control by membrane surface modification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 63 (2008) 558-565
17. Pieracci J., Wood D.W., Crivello J.V., and Belfort G. Increasing membrane permeability of UV-modified poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 202 (2002) 1-16
18. Pieracci J., Wood D.W., Crivello J.V., and Belfort G. Increasing membrane permeability of UV-modified poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 156 (1999) 223-240
19. Qiu C., Xu F., Nguyen Q.T., and Ping Z. Nanofiltration membrane prepared b from cardo polyetherketone ultrafiltration membrane by UV-irradiated grafting method. J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2005) 107-115
20. Lee D.H., Kim H.I., and Kim S.S. Surface modification of polymeric membranes by UV grafting. Advanced Material for Membrane Separations. Chapter 19. ACS Symposium Series, vol. 876 (2004) 281-299
21. Ulbricht M., Richau K., and Kamusewitz H. Chemically and morphologically defined ultrafiltration membrane surfaces prepared by heterogeneous photo-initiated graft polymerization. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 138 (1998) 353-366
22. Yamagishi H., Crivello J.V., and Belfort G. Development of a novel photochemical technique for modifying poly(arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 105 (1995) 237-247
23. Yamagishi H., Crivello J.V., and Belfort G. Evaluation of photochemically modified poly(arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 105 (1995) 249-259
24. Xi W., Rong W., Zhansheng L., and Fane A.G. Development of a novel electrophoresis-UV grafting technique to modify PES UF membranes for NOM removal. J. Membr. Sci. 273 (2006) 47-57
25. Taniguchi M., Kilduff J.E., and Belfort G. Low fouling synthetic membranes by UV-assisted graft polymerization: monomer selection to mitigate fouling by natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 222 (2003) 59-70
26. Wu G., Li Y., Han M., and Liu X. Novel thermo-sensitive membranes prepared by rapid bulk photo-grafting polymerization of N,N-diethylacrylamide onto the microfiltration membranes Nylon. J. Membr. Sci. 283 (2006) 13-20
27. Hilal N., and Kochkodan V. Surface modified microfiltration membranes with molecularly recognizing properties. J. Membr. Sci. 213 (2003) 97-113
28. J. Ji, Fabrication and photochemical surface modification of photoreactive thin-film composite membranes and model development for thin film formation by interfacial polymerization. PhD Thesis, McMaster University Hamiltion, Canada, 1996.
29. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5th ed. (2001), John Wiley & Sons, New York
30. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 2nd ed. (2002), John Wiley & Sons, New York
31. Ravikumar K., Pakshirajan K., Swaminathan T., and Balu K. Optimization of batch process parameters using response surface methodology for dye removal by a novel adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 105 (2005) 131-138
32. Lacin O., Bayrak B., Korkut O., and Sayan E. Modeling of adsorption and ultrasonic desorption of cadmium(II) and zinc(II) on local bentonite. J. Colloids Interf. Sci. 292 (2005) 330-335
33. Hamsaveni D.R., Prapulla S.G., and Divakar S. Response surface methodological approach for the synthesis of isobutyl isobutyrate. Process Biochem. 36 (2001) 1103-1109
34. Palamakula A., Nutan M.T.H., and Khan M.A. Response surface methodology for optimization and characterization of limonene-based coenzyme Q10 self-nanoemulsified capsule dosage form AAPS. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 5 (2004) 1-8
35. 3 catalyst: effects of temperature, gas flow rate and reactant partial pressure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 934-939
36. Lemoine R., Behkish A., and Morsi B.I. Hydrodynamic and mass-transfer characteristics in organic liquid mixtures in a large-scale bubble column reactor for toluene oxidation process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (2004) 6195-9212
37. Ahmadi M., Vahabzadeh F., Bonakdarpour B., Mofarrah E., and Mehranian M. Application of the central composite design and response surface methodology to the advanced treatment of olive oil processing wastewater using Fenton's peroxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. B 123 (2005) 187-195
38. Ramirez J.H., Costa C.A., and Madeira L.M. Experimental design to optimize the degradation of the synthetic dye Orange II using Fenton's reagent. Catal. Today 107-108 (2005) 68-76
39. Rana-Madaria P., Nagarajan M., Rajagopal C., and Garg B.S. Removal of chromium from aqueous solutions by treatment with carbon aerogel electrodes using response surface methodology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 6549-6559
40. Gao X.K., Low T.S., Liu Z.J., and Chen S.X. Robust design for torque optimization using response surface methodology. IEEE Trans. Magnetics 32 (2002) 1141-1144
41. Xiarchos I., Jaworska A., and Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface methodology for the modelling of copper removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 321 (2008) 222-231
42. Cojocaru C., and Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface modeling and optimization of copper removal from aqua solutions using polymer assisted ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 298 1-2 (2007) 56-70
43. Santafé-Moros A., Gozálvez-Zafrilla J.M., Lora-García J., and García-Díaz J.C. Mixture design applied to describe the influence of ionic composition on the removal of nitrate ions using nanofiltration. Desalination 185 1-3 (2005) 289-296
44. Khayet M., Cojocaru C., and García-Payo M.C. Application of response surface methodology and experimental design in direct contact membrane distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 5673-5685
45. Ismail A.F., and Lai P.Y. Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 40 2 (2004) 191-207
46. Xiangli F., Wei W., Chen Y., Jin W., and Xu N. Optimization of preparation conditions for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite pervaporation membranes using response surface methodology. J. Membr. Sci. 311 1-2 (2008) 23-33
47. Khayet M., Cojocaru C., and Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface modelling and optimization in pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 321 2 (2008) 272-283
48. Idris A., Kormin F., and Noordin M.Y. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 49 (2006) 271-280
49. K.M. Carley, N.Y. Kamneva, J. Reminga, Response Surface Methodology CASOS Technical Report. CMU-ISRI-04-136, 2004.
50. Akhnazarova S., and Kafarov V. Experiment Optimization in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (1982), Mir Publishers, Moscow
51. Derringer G., and Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J. Qual. Technol. 12 (1980) 214-221
52. Hsieh K.L., Tong L.I., Chiu H.P., and Yeh H.Y. Optimization of a multi-response problem in Taguchi's dynamic system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 49 (2005) 556-571
53. Jeong I.J., and Kim K.J. D-STEM: a modified step method with desirability function concept. Comput. Oper. Res. 32 (2005) 3175-3190
54. Pasandideh S.H.R., and Niaki S.T.A. Multi-response optimization using genetic algorithm within desirability function framework. Appl. Math. Comput. 175 (2006) 366-382