Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 79-85

  Beier, Ulrike Stephanie ^a   Kapferer, Ines ^a   Burtscher, Doris ^a   Dumfahrt, Herbert ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; GLASS CERAMICS; LEUCITE; LITHIA DISILICATE; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRUXISM; CANINE TOOTH; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COLOR; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; FELDSPAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; PERIODONTICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMOKING; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BRUXISM; CERAMICS; COLOR; CUSPID; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL VENEERS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; PERIODONTAL INDEX; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMOKING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 84859476125     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Pincus CR. Building mouth personality. J South Calif Dent Assoc 1938; 14: 125-129.
2. Garber DA, Goldstein RE, Feinman RA. Porcelain Laminate Veneers. Chicago: Quintessence, 1988.
3. Friedman MJ. Porcelain veneer restorations: A clinician’s opinion about a disturbing trend. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13: 318-327.
4. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18: 216-225.
5. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part I-Clinical procedure. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 505-513.
6. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 211-221.
7. Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 9-18.
8. Layton D, Walton R. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 389-396.
9. Friedman MA. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-A clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 625-628, 630.
10. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J Dent 2000; 28: 163-177.
11. Walls AW. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 1. Clinical technique. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 333-336.
12. Attanasio R. Nocturnal bruxism and its clinical management. Dent Clin North Am 1991; 35: 245-252.
13. Ramfjord SP, Ash M. Occlusion. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971.
14. Kampe T, Tagdae T, Bader G, Edman G, Karlsson S. Reported symptoms and clinical findings in a group of subjects with longstanding bruxing behaviour. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 581-587.
15. Lobbezoo F, Lavigne GJ. Do bruxism and temporomandibuar disorders have a cause-and-effect relationship? J Orofac Pain 1997; 11: 15-23.
16. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 327-334.
17. Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 70-78.
18. Quality Evaluation of Dental Care. Guidelines for the Assessment of Clinical Quality and Performance. Sacramento, California: California Dental Association, 1995.
19. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
20. Saxer U, Mühlemann H. Motivation und Aufklarung. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1975; 85: 905-919.
21. Borderson SP. Anterior guidance-The key to successful occlusal treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 396-400.
22. Kawamura Y, Nishiyama T, Funakoshi M. A study on topognosis of human tooth [in Japanese]. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1967; 7: 1-5.
23. Williamson EH, Lundquist DO. Anterior guidance: Its effect on electromyographic activity of the temporal and masseter muscles. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 816-823.
24. Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Statistics in Dentistry. London: British Dental Association, 1989.
25. Lin DY, Wei LJ. The robust inference for the proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc 1989; 84: 1074-1078.
26. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22.
27. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 65-76.
28. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122: 41-47.
29. Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Gladys S, Braem M, Vanherle G. Restorative therapy for erosive lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 229-240.
30. Ekfeldt A, Karlsson S. Changes of masticatory movement and characteristics after prosthodontic rehabilitation of individuals with extensive tooth wear. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 539-546.
31. Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. J Dent 1998; 26: 345-353.
32. Shaini FJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneer. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 553-559.
33. Hui KK, Williams B, Davis EH, Holt RD. A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. Br Dent J 1991; 171: 51-55.
34. Christensen GJ, Christensen RP. Clinical observations of porcelain veneers: A three-year report. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 174-179.
35. Jaeger K, Stren M, Wirz J. Laminates-Reif fuer die Praxis? Die Quintessenz 1995; 46: 1221-1230.