Automated landmarking and geometric characterization of the carotid siphon

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 889-903

  Bogunović, Hrvoje ^a,b   Pozo, José María ^a,b   Cárdenes, Rubén ^a,b   Villa Uriol, María Cruz ^a,b   Blanc, Raphaël ^c   Piotin, Michel ^c   Frangi, Alejandro F ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

^c FONDATION OPHTALMOLOGIQUE ADOLPHE DE ROTHSCHILD   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cerebral angiography; Computational anatomy; Geometric quantification; Internal carotid artery; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

3D ROTATIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS; ANGIOGRAPHIC IMAGES; CENTERLINE EXTRACTION; CENTERLINES; COMPUTATIONAL ANATOMY; CROSS VALIDATION; CURVATURE VECTORS; GEOMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION; GEOMETRIC FEATURE; GEOMETRIC QUANTIFICATION; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; LANDMARKING; LARGE DEFORMATIONS; MULTIPLE OBSERVERS; PARALLEL TRANSPORT; PARAMETERIZED; RISK FACTORS; SHAPE SIMILARITY; VASCULAR PATHOLOGY; VASCULATURE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; AUTOMATION; BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); CHARACTERIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; SIPHONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

HEMODYNAMICS;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; ANGIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84859434287     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Antiga L., Ene-Iordache B., Remuzzi A. Computational geometry for patient-specific reconstruction and meshing of blood vessels from MR and CT angiography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2003, 22:674-684.
2. Antiga L., Steinman D.A. Robust and objective decomposition and mapping of bifurcating vessels. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2004, 23:704-713.
3. Antiga, L., Steinman, D.A., 2011. VMTK: the vascular modeling toolkit. http://www.vmtk.org.
4. Beg M.F., Miller M.I., Trouve A., Younes L. Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2005, 61:139-157.
5. Bishop R.L. There is more than one way to frame a curve. Am. Math. Monthly 1975, 82:246-251.
6. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327:307-310.
7. Bogunovic, H., Pozo, J.M., Cardenes, R., Frangi, A.F., 2010. Automatic identification of internal carotid artery from 3DRA images. In: Proc. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), pp. 5343-5346.
8. Bogunovic H., Pozo J.M., Villa-Uriol M.C., Majoie C.B.L.M., van den Berg R., Gratama van Andel H.A.F., Macho J.M., Blasco J., San Roman L., Frangi A.F. Automated segmentation of cerebral vasculature with aneurysms in 3DRA and TOF-MRA using geodesic active regions: an evaluation study. Med. Phys. 2011, 38:210-222.
9. Boskamp T., Rinck D., Link F., Knmmerlen B., Stamm G., Mildenberger P. New vessel analysis tool for morphometric quantification and visualization of vessels in CT and MR imaging data sets. RadioGraphics 2004, 24:287-297.
10. Brisman J.L., Song J.K., Newell D.W. Cerebral aneurysms. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355:928-939.
11. Bullitt E., Gerig G., Pizer S.M., Lin W., Aylward S.R. Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2003, 22:1163-1171.
12. Bullitt E., Muller K.E., Jung I., Lin W., Aylward S. Analyzing attributes of vessel populations. Med. Image Anal. 2005, 9:39-49.
13. Cardenes, R., Bogunovic, H., Frangi, A.F., 2010. Fast 3D centerline computation for tubular structures by front collapsing and fast marching. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), pp. 4109-4112.
14. Carstensen B., Simpson J., Gurrin L.C. Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. Int. J. Biostat. 2008, 4. Article 16.
15. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J., 2011. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
16. Chen S.Y.J., Carroll J.D., Messenger J.C. Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2002, 21:724-740.
17. Fletcher P., Lu C., Pizer S., Joshi S. Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2004, 23:995-1005.
18. Formaggia L., Quarteroni A., Veneziani A. Cardiovascular Mathematics: Modeling and Simulation of the Circulatory System 2009, Springer.
19. Frangos S.G., Gahtan V., Sumpio B. Localization of atherosclerosis: role of hemodynamics. Arch. Surg. 1999, 134:1142-1149.
20. Friedman M.H. Variability of 3D arterial geometry and dynamics, and its pathologic implications. Biorheology 2002, 39:513-517.
21. Friedman M.H., Deters O.J., Mark F.F., Bargeron C.B., Hutchins G.M. Arterial geometry affects hemodynamics: a potential risk factor for atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 1983, 46:225-231.
22. Gerber S., Tasdizen T., Thomas Fletcher P., Joshi S., Whitaker R. Manifold modeling for brain population analysis. Med. Image Anal. 2010, 14:643-653.
23. Gielecki J., Zurada A., Gajda G., Nowak D., Sienkiewicz-Zawilinska J. The description of vascular variations in three-dimensional space: a novel method of spatial cerebral arteries evaluation. Med. Sci. Mon. 2008, 14:MT36.
24. Glaunes J., Qiu A., Miller M.I., Younes L. Large deformation diffeomorphic metric curve mapping. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008, 80:317-336.
25. Grenander U., Miller M.I. Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline. Q. Appl. Math. 1998, 56:617-694.
26. Halon D.A., Sapoznikov D., Lewis B.S., Gotsman M.S. Localization of lesions in the coronary circulation. Am. J. Cardiol. 1983, 52:921-926.
27. Hanson A.J., Ma H. Quaternion frame approach to streamline visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 1995, 1:164-174.
28. Hernandez M., Frangi A. Non-parametric geodesic active regions: method and evaluation for cerebral aneurysms segmentation in 3DRA and CTA. Med. Image Anal. 2007, 11:224-241.
29. Jiang W.J., Wang Y.J., Du B., Wang S.X., Wang G.H., Jin M., Dai J.P. Stenting of symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery: an initial experience of 40 patients. Stroke 2004, 35:1375-1380.
30. Joshi S.C., Miller M.I. Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000, 9:1357-1370.
31. Kendall D.G., Barden D., Carne T.K., Le H. Shape and Shape Theory 1999, Wiley.
32. Kim D.W., Kang S.D. Association between internal carotid artery morphometry and posterior communicating artery aneurysm. Yonsei Med. J. 2007, 48:634-638.
33. Kim J.S., Caplan L.R., Wong K.S.L. Intracranial Atherosclerosis 2008, Wiley-Blackwell.
34. Krayenbuehl, H., Yasargil, M., Huber, P., 1982. Cerebral Angiography. Thieme, second ed.
35. Lee K.E., Parker K.H., Caro C.G., Sherwin S.J. The spectral/hp element modelling of steady flow in non-planar double bends. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluid 2008, 57:519-529.
36. Lee S.W., Antiga L., Spence J.D., Steinman D.A. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 2008, 39:2341-2347.
37. Meng S., Costa L.d.F., Geyer S.H., Viana M.P., Reiter C., Muller G.B., Weninger W.J. Three-dimensional description and mathematical characterization of the parasellar internal carotid artery in human infants. J. Anat. 2008, 212:636-644.
38. Meng S., Geyer S.H., Costa L.d.F., Viana M.P., Weninger W.J. Objective characterization of the course of the parasellar internal carotid artery using mathematical tools. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2008, 30:519-526.
39. O'Flynn P.M., O'Sullivan G., Pandit A.S. Methods for three-dimensional geometric characterization of the arterial vasculature. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 35:1368-1381.
40. Pakbaz R.S., Kerber C.W. Complex curve microcatheters for berry aneurysm endovascular therapy. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007, 28:179-180.
41. Pekalska E., Duin R.P.W. The Dissimilarity Representation for Pattern Recognition: Foundations and Applications 2005, World Scientific Publishing Company.
42. Piccinelli M., Bacigaluppi S., Boccardi E., Ene-Iordache B., Remuzzi A., Veneziani A., Antiga L. Geometry of the ICA and recurrent patterns in location, orientation and rupture status of lateral aneurysms: an image-based computational study. Neurosurgery 2011, 68:1270-1285.
43. Piccinelli M., Veneziani A., Steinman D.A., Remuzzi A., Antiga L. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2009, 28:1141-1155.
44. Sangalli L.M., Secchi P., Vantini S., Veneziani A. A case study in exploratory functional data analysis: geometrical features of the internal carotid artery. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2009, 104:37-48.
45. Sangalli L.M., Secchi P., Vantini S., Vitelli V. K-mean alignment for curve clustering. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2010, 54:1219-1233.
46. Subramanian, N., Kesavadas, T., Hoffmann, K., 2004. Geometry-based metrics for planning of neuroendovascular therapy. In: Lemke, H.U., Inamura, K., Doi, K., Vannier, M.W., Farman, A.G., Reiber, J.H.C. (Eds.), Proc. Int. Congr. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. (CARS), pp. 718-723.
47. Thomas J.B., Antiga L., Che S.L., Milner J.S., Steinman D.A.H., Spence J.D., Rutt B.K., Steinman D.A. Variation in the carotid bifurcation geometry of young versus older adults: implications for geometric risk of atherosclerosis. Stroke 2005, 36:2450-2456.
48. Toyota S., Fujimoto Y., Iwamoto F., Wakayama A., Yoshimine T. Technique for shaping microcatheter tips in coil embolization of paraclinoid aneurysms using full-scale volume rendering images of 3D rotational angiography. Minim. Invasive Neurosurg. 2009, 52:201-203.
49. Zhu H., Ding Z., Piana R.N., Gehrig T.R., Friedman M.H. Cataloguing the geometry of the human coronary arteries: a potential tool for predicting risk of coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009, 135:43-52.