Cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in Academia

Proceedings of ISSI 2011 - 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 638-649

  Ozel, Bulent ^a  

^a ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; COGNITIVE STRUCTURES; COLLABORATION PATTERNS; INTERNATIONAL ARENA; KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION; KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES; RESEARCH FRAMEWORKS; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY;

PUBLISHING;

EID: 84859431716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Acedo, F., B. Carmen, C. Casanueva, and J. Galan. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies 43(5), 957-984.
2. Bhattacharya, S. and P. Basu. (1998). Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics 43(3), 359-372.
3. Borner, K., C. Chen, and K. Boyack. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37, 179-255.
4. Cahlik, T. (2000). Comparison of the maps of science. Scientometrics 49 (3), 373-387.
5. Cahlik, T. and M. Jirina. (2006). Law of cumulative advantages in the evolution of scientific fields. Scientometrics 66(3), 441-449.
6. Calero, C., R. Buter, C. Valdes, and E. Noyons. (2006). How to identify research groups using publication analysis: an example in the field of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 66(2), 365-376.
7. Calero-Medina, C. and E. C. M. Noyons. (2008). Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4), 272-279.
8. Callon, M. (1986). Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph (32), Chapter Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay, pp. 196-233. London: Routledge.
9. Callon, M., J. Law, and A. Rip. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. London: The Macmillian Press Ltd.
10. Carley, K. M. (2002). Summary of key network measures for characterizing organizational architectures. Technical Report: Institute for Software Research, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
11. Carley, K. M., J. Reminga, J. Storrick, and M. De Reno. (2009). Ora user's guide 2009. Technical report, Institute for Software Research, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
12. Doerfel, M. and G. Barnett. (1999). Application semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research 25(4), 589-603. 47th Annual Meeting of the International Communication-Association, Montreal, Canada, May 22, 1997.
13. Geisler, E. (2007). A typology of knowledge management: strategic groups and role behavior in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management 11(1).
14. He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 48(1), 133-159.
15. Law, J. and J. Hassard. (1999). Actor-Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Law, J. and J. Whittaker. (1992). Mapping acidification research - A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics 23(3), 417-461.
17. Lee, W. H. (2008). How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An example in the field of Information Security. Scientometrics 76 (3), 503-525.
18. Leydesdorff, L. (1992). A validation-study of leximappe. Scientometrics 25(2), 295-312.
19. Mannheim, K. (1968). Ideology and utopia : An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
21. Mika, P. (2005). Social networks and the Semantic Web: The next challenge. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20(1), 82-85.
22. Morris, S. A. and B. Van der Veer Martens. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science And Technology 42, 213-295.
23. Mutschke, P. and A. Haase (2001). Collaboration and cognitive structures in social science research fields. Towards socio-cognitive analysis in information systems. Scientometrics 52(3), 487-502.
24. Neff, M. W. and E. A. Corley. (2009). 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics 80 (3), 657-682.
25. Noyons, E. C. M. and C. Calero-Medina. (2009). Applying bibliometric mapping in a high level science policy context. Scientometrics 79(2), 261-275.
26. Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. The Journal of the British Sociological Association 42 (5), pp. 821-836.
27. Qin, J. (1994). An investigation of research collaboration in the sciences through the philosophical transactions 1901-1991. Scientometrics 29(2), 219-238.
28. Rip, A. and J. Courtial (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology - An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics 6(6), 381-400.
29. Scheler, M. (1980). Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge.
30. Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (2 ed.). Sage.
31. Tijssen, R. and A. Vanraan. (1989). Mapping co-word structures - A comparison of multidimensionalscaling and Leximappe. Scientometrics 15(3-4), 283-295.
32. Turner, W. and F. Rojouan. (1991). Evaluating input output relationships in a regional research network using co-word analysis. Scientometrics 22 (1), 139-154.
33. Vanraan, A. and R. Tijssen. (1993). The neural net of neural network research - An exercise in bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 26 (1), 169-192.
34. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.