The role of monetary incentives in feedback processing: Why we should pay our participants

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 347-353

  Van Den Berg, Ivo ^a   Shaul, Lilach ^a   Van Der Veen, Frederik M ^a   Franken, Ingmar H A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

feedback processing; feedback related negativity; monetary incentives; nonmonetary feedback; P3; remedial action

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AMPLITUDE MODULATOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING; MONETARY FEEDBACK; NONMONETARY FEEDBACK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859422310     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328351db2f     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002; 295:2279-2282. (Pubitemid 34258845)
2. Holroyd CB, Coles MGH. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002; 109:679-709.
3. Holroyd CB. A note on the oddball N200 and the feedback ERN. In: Ullsperger M, Falkenstein M, editors. Errors, conflicts, and the brain: current opinions on performance monitoring. Leipzig: MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience; 2004. pp. 211-218.
4. Holroyd CB, Pakzad-Vaezi KL, Krigolson OE. The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. Psychophysiology 2008; 45: 688-697.
5. Holroyd CB, Krigolson OE, Lee S. Reward positivity elicited by predictive cues. Neuroreport 2011; 22:249-252.
6. Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9: 788-798. (Pubitemid 28025194)
7. Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol 2006; 71:148-154. (Pubitemid 43082242)
8. Van den Berg I, Franken IHA, Muris P. Individual differences in sensitivity to reward: association with electrophysiological responses to monetary gains and losses. J Psychophysiol 2011; 25:81-86.
9. Van der Veen FM, Röder CH, Mies GW, Van der Lugt A, Smits M. Remedial action and feedback processing in a time-estimation task: evidence for a role of the rostral cingulate zone in behavioral adjustments without learning. Neuroimage 2011; 54:447-454.
10. Holroyd CB, Larsen JT, Cohen JD. Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:245-253. (Pubitemid 38524096)
11. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Holroyd CB, Schurger A, Cohen JD. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14:741-747. (Pubitemid 38856949)
12. Bellebaum C, Polezzi D, Daum I. It is less than you expected: the feedbackrelated negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48:3343-3350.
13. Wu Y, Zhou X. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation. Brain Res 2009; 1286:114-122.
14. Yeung N, Sanfey AG. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. J Neurosci 2004; 24:6258-6264. (Pubitemid 38944215)
15. Sato A, Yasuda A, Ohira H, Miyawaki K, Nishikawa M, Kumano H, et al. Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. Neuroreport 2005; 16:407-411. (Pubitemid 40434575)
16. Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:905-912. (Pubitemid 47609612)
17. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484. (Pubitemid 13112654)
18. Holroyd CB, Krigolson OE. Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:913-917. (Pubitemid 47609608)
19. Foti D, Kotov R, Klein DN, Hajcak G. Abnormal neural sensitivity to monetary gains versus losses among adolescents at risk for depression. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2011; 39:913-924.