Differential effects of perceived hand location on the disruption of embodiment by apparent physical encroachment of the limb

Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 2, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 163-170

  Preston, Catherine ^a,b   Newport, Roger ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body image; Body ownership; Body schema; Body violation; Embodiment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHANTOM; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; PREDICTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84859404817     PISSN: 17588928     EISSN: 17588936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2011.582944     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Armel, K. C. and Ramachandran, V. S. 2003. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of Biological Science, 270: 1499-1506.
2. Botvinick, M. and Cohen, J. 1998. Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391: 756
3. Ehrsson, H. H. 2009. How many arms make a pair? Perceptual illusion of having an additional arm. Perception, 38: 310-312.
4. Ehrsson, H. H., Wiech, K., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J. and Passingham, R. E. 2007. Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 9828-9833.
5. Farne, A., Pavani, F., Meneghello, F. and Ládavas, E. 2000. Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123: 2350-2360.
6. Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J. and Jeannerod, M. 2003. Modulating the experience of agency: A positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage, 18: 324-333.
7. Giummarra, M. J., Gibson, S. J., Georgiou-Karistanis, N. and Bradshaw, J. L. 2008. Mechanisms underlying embodiment, disembodiment and loss of embodiment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32: 143-160.
8. Henderson, W. R. and Smyth, G. E. 1948. Phantom limbs. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 11(2): 88-112.
9. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M. and Iwamura, Y. 1996. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 2: 2325-2330.
10. Kao, K. L. C. and Goodale, M. A. 2009. Enhanced detection of visual targets. Neuropsychologia, 47: 2454-2463.
11. Karnath, H. O. and Baier, B. 2010. Right insula for our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Brain Structure and Function, 214: 411-417.
12. Khateb, A., Simon, S. R., Dieguez, S., Lazeyras, F., Momjian-Mayor, I.Blanke, O. 2009. Seeing the phantom: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of a supernumerary phantom limb. Annals of Neurology, 65: 698-705. doi:doi: 10.1002/ana.21647
13. Lloyd, D. M. 2007. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition, 64: 104-109.
14. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S. and Driver, J. 2002. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83: 25-34.
15. Moore, D. G., Goodwin, J. E., George, R., Axelsson, E. L. and Braddick, F. M. B. 2007. Infants perceive human point-light displays as solid forms. Cognition, 104: 377-396.
16. Myers, A. and Sowden, P. T. 2008. Your hand or mine? The extrastriate body area. NeuroImage, 42: 1669-1677.
17. Newport, R., Pearce, R. and Preston, C. 2010. Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research, 204: 385-395.
18. Parkinson, A., Condon, L. and Jackson, S. R. 2010. Parietal cortex coding of limb posture: In search of the body-schema. Neuropsychologia, 48: 3228-3234.
19. Pavani, F., Spence, C. and Driver, J. 2000. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11: 353-359.
20. Preston, C. and Newport, R. 2008. "Was that me? The right hemisphere and the sense of agency: Embodiment of others and misattribution of self-generated action". In Beyond the brain: Embodied, situated and distributed cognition, Edited by: Hardy-Vallee, B. and Payette, N. 107-122. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
21. Preston, C. and Newport, R. 2011. Evidence for dissociable representations for body image and body schema from a patient with visual neglect. Neurocase,
22. Poeck, K. 1964. Phantoms following amputation in early childhood and in congenital absence of limbs. Cortex, 1: 269-275.
23. Saxe, R., Jamal, N. and Powell, L. 2006. My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. Cerebral Cortex, 16: 178-182.
24. Saxe, R., Tzelnic, T. and Carey, S. 2006. Five-month-old infants know humans are solid, like inanimate objects. Cognition, 101: B1-B8.
25. Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M. A. and Decety, J. 2000. New aspects of motion perception: Selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. Neuroreport, 11: 109-115.
26. Tsakiris, M. and Haggard, P. 2005. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31: 80-91.
27. Tsakiris, M. 2010. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48: 703-712.
28. Vallar, G. and Ronchi, R. 2009. Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192: 533-551.
29. Zopf, R., Savage, G. and Williams, M. A. 2010. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 48: 713-725.