Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 373-381

  Wood, Joanne M ^a   Chaparro, Alex ^b   Lacherez, Philippe ^c   Hickson, Louise ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

distracters; driving; older drivers; selective attention; useful field of view (UFOV)

Indexed keywords

DISTRACTERS; DRIVING; OLDER DRIVERS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; USEFUL FIELD OF VIEW;

FORECASTING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RATING; ROADS AND STREETS; TEACHING;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS;

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUSTRALIA; CAR DRIVING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VISUAL FIELD;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; QUEENSLAND; RISK FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84859348037     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31824c17ee     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Clay OJ, Wadley VG, Edwards JD, Roth DL, Roenker DL, Ball KK. Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: current and future implications. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:724-31.
2. Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3110-23.
3. Owsley C, Ball K, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR. Visual/ cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. Psychol Aging 1991;6:403-15.
4. Owsley C, Ball K, McGwin G, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, White MF, Overley ET. Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA 1998;279:1083-8.
5. Cross JM, McGwin G, Jr., Rubin GS, Ball KK, West SK, Roenker DL, Owsley C. Visual and medical risk factors for motor vehicle collision involvement among older drivers. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93:400-4.
6. Rubin GS, Ng ES, Bandeen-Roche K, Keyl PM, Freeman EE, West SK. A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1483-91.
7. Haymes SA, Leblanc RP, Nicolela MT, Chiasson LA, Chauhan BC. Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1149-55.
8. Myers RS, Ball KK, Kalina TD, Roth DL, Goode KT. Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance. Percept Mot Skills 2000;91:279-90.
9. Wood JM. Age and visual impairment decrease driving performance as measured on a closed-road circuit. Hum Factors 2002;44:482-94.
10. Roenker DL, Cissell GM, Ball KK, Wadley VG, Edwards JD. Speedof-processing and driving simulator training result in improved driving performance. Hum Factors 2003;45:218-33.
11. George S, Crotty M. Establishing criterion validity of the Useful Field of View assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: comparison to the result of on-road assessment. Am J Occup Ther 2010; 64:114-22.
12. Classen S, McCarthy DP, Shechtman O, Awadzi KD, Lanford DN, Okun MS, Rodriguez RL, Romrell J, Bridges S, Kluger B, Fernandez HH. Useful field of view as a reliable screening measure of driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease: results of a pilot study. Traffic Inj Prev 2009;10:593-8.
13. Silva MT, Laks J, Engelhardt E. Neuropsychological tests and driving in dementia: a review of the recent literature. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2009;55:484-8.
14. Duchek JM, Hunt L, Ball K, Buckles V, Morris JC. Attention and driving performance in Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1998;53:P130-41.
15. Edwards JD, Vance DE, Wadley VG, Cissell GM, Roenker DL, Ball KK. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005;27: 529-43.
16. Visual Awareness Inc. UFOV User's Guide. Birmingham, AL: Visual Awareness Inc.; 2002, revised 1/04.
17. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA). The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Traffic Administration, US Department of Transportation; 2006.
18. Hasher L, Zacks RT. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1988: 193-225.
19. Hasher L, Lustig C, Zacks RT. Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In: Conway A, Jarrold C, Kane M, Miyake A, Towse J, eds. Variation in Working Memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007:227-49.
20. McGwin G, Brown DB. Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 1999;31: 181-98.
21. Preusser DF, Williams AF, Ferguson SA, Ulmer RG, Weinstein HB. Fatal crash risk for older drivers at intersections. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30:151-9.
22. Cantin V, Lavalliere M, Simoneau M, Teasdale N. Mental workload when driving in a simulator: effects of age and driving complexity. Accid Anal Prev 2009;41:763-71.
23. Atchley P, Dressel J. Conversation limits the functional field of view. Hum Factors 2004;46:664-73.
24. Amado S., Ulupinar P. The effects of conversation on attention and peripheral detection: is talking with a passenger and talking on the cell phone different? Transport Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 2005 8 383-395
25. McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, Woodward M. The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. Accid Anal Prev 2007;39: 1170-6.
26. Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Association between cellulartelephone calls and motor vehicle collisions.NEngl J Med 1997;336: 453-8.
27. Horberry T, Anderson J, Regan MA, Triggs TJ, Brown J. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev 2006;38:185-91.
28. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 1994;116:220-44.
29. Wingfield A, Tun PA, McCoy SL. Hearing loss in older adulthood: what it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005;14:144-8.
30. Avolio BJ, Kroeck KG, Panek PE. Individual differences in informationprocessing ability as a predictor of motor vehicle accidents. Hum Factors 1985;27:577-87.
31. Parasuraman R, Nestor PG. Attention and driving skills in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Hum Factors 1991;33:539-57.
32. Duchek JM, Hunt L, Ball K, Buckles V, Morris JC. The role of selective attention in driving and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997;11(Suppl 1):48-56.
33. Anstey KJ, Wood J. Chronological age and age-related cognitive deficits are associated with an increase in multiple types of driving errors in late life. Neuropsychology 2011;25:613-21.
34. Hickson L, Wood J, Chaparro A, Lacherez P, Marszalek R. Hearing impairment affects older people's ability to drive in the presence of distracters. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:1097-103.
35. Chaparro A, Wood JM, Carberry T. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:747-54.
36. Wood J, Chaparro A, Hickson L. Interaction between visual status, driver age and distracters on daytime driving performance. Vision Res 2009;49:2225-31.
37. Edwards JD, Myers C, Ross LA, Roenker DL, Cissell GM, McLaughlin AM, Ball KK. The longitudinal impact of cognitive speed of processing training on driving mobility. Gerontologist 2009;49: 485-94.
38. Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press; 1997.
39. Wood JM. Aging, driving and vision. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85: 214-20.
40. Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Viana M. Relative effects of age and compromised vision on driving performance. Hum Factors 1995;37:430-6.
41. Hakamies-Blomqvist L. Older drivers' accident risk: conceptual and methodological issues. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30:293-7.
42. Keskinen E, Ota H, Katila A. Older drivers fail in intersections: speed discrepancies between older and younger male drivers. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30:323-30.
43. Trick LM, Toxopeus R, Wilson D. The effects of visibility conditions, traffic density, and navigational challenge on speed compensation and driving performance in older adults. Accid Anal Prev 2010; 42:1661-71.
44. Baddeley A. Working memory. Science 1992;255:556-9.
45. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:829-39.
46. Pietras TA, Shi Q, Lee JD, Rizzo M. Traffic-entry behavior and crash risk for older drivers with impairment of selective attention. Percept Mot Skills 2006;102:632-44.
47. Chaparro A, Groff L, Tabor K, Sifrit K, Guguerty LJ. Maintaining situational awareness: the role of visual attention. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Houston, TX, 1999:1343-7.
48. Ball KK, Roenker DL, Wadley VG, Edwards JD, Roth DL, McGwin G, Jr., Raleigh R, Joyce JJ, Cissell GM, Dube T. Can high-risk older drivers be identified through performance-based measures in a Department of Motor Vehicles setting? J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54: 77-84.
49. Grady CL, Craik FI. Changes in memory processing with age. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000;10:224-31.
50. Raz N. Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: integration of structural and functional findings. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum and Associates; 2000:1-90.
51. Clarke DD, Ward P, Bartle C, Truman W. Older drivers' road traffic crashes in the UK. Accid Anal Prev 2010;42:1018-24.