Survivability analysis of a struck ship with damage opening - influence from model and material properties uncertainties

Ships and Offshore Structures

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 339-354

  Hogström, Per ^a   Ringsberg, Jonas W ^a   Johnson, Erland ^a,b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b SP TECHNICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

collision; damage stability; fracture; nonlinear FEA; survivability analysis; uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

COLLISION; CONSTITUTIVE MATERIALS; DAMAGE CRITERIA; DAMAGE DEGRADATION; DAMAGE STABILITY; EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORMING LIMIT DIAGRAMS; HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY; HOLISTIC APPROACH; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; NATURAL VARIATION; NONLINEAR FEA; REALISTIC MATERIALS; SHEAR FAILURE; SHIP-TO-SHIP COLLISION; SIMPLIFIED MODELS; SIZE AND SHAPE; STRUCTURAL POINT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURVIVABILITY ANALYSIS; WAVE MOTIONS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; SHEAR FLOW; SHIPS; STABILITY CRITERIA;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84859324164     PISSN: 17445302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2010.500052     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alsos, H S. 2008. Ship grounding, analysis of ductile fracture, bottom damage and hull girder response [dissertation]. [Trondheim (Norway)], Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
2. Alsos, H S, Hopperstad, O S, Törnqvist, R and Amdahl, J. 2008. Analytical and numerical analysis of sheet metal instability using a stress-based criterion. Int J Solids Struct., 45(7-8): 2042-2055.
3. Dassault Systèmes. 2007. Abaqus Version 6.7 documentation, analysis users manual, section 19.2. Vélizy Villacoublay (France), ABAQUS Incorp.
4. Det Norske Veritas. 2007. Rules or classification of ships/high speed, light craft and naval surface craft, part 2, chapter 1-2, Høvik, (Norway): Det Norske Veritas.
5. Ehlers, S. 2009. Material relation to assess the crashworthiness of ship structures [dissertation]. [Espoo (Finland)], Helsinki University of Technology.
6. Ehlers, S, Broekhuijsen, J, Alsos, H, Biehl, F and Tabri, K. 2008. Simulating the collision response of ship side structures: a failure criteria benchmark study. Int Shipbuild Prog., 55(1-2): 127-144.
7. Ehlers, S and Varsta, P. 2009. Stress and strain relations for non-linear finite element simulations. Thin-Walled Struct., 47(11): 1203-1217.
8. GOM: measuring system-ARAMIS [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.gom.com/EN/measuring.systems/aramis/system/system.html[cited 2010 Feb 7]
9. Hogben, N, Dacunha, NMC and Olliver, GF. 1986. Global wave statistics, Feltham, UK: British Maritime Technology.
10. Hogström, P, Ringsberg, J W and Johnson, E. 2009. An experimental and numerical study on the effects of length scale and strain state on the necking and fracture behaviours in sheet metal. Int J Impact Eng., 36(10-11): 1194-1203.
11. Hong, L and Amdahl, J. 2007. Plastic design of laterally loaded plates for ships. Mar Struct., 20(3): 124-142.
12. ISO 12004-2. 2007. Metallic materials-sheet and strip-determination of forming limit curves-part 2: determination of forming limit curves in laboratory, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standard
13. ISSC Committee V.1. Collision and grounding. 16th International Ship and Offshore Structure Congress. Aug20-252006. Edited by: Frieze, P A and Shenoi, R A. Vol. 2, Southampton, UK: University of Southampton. chapter 1
14. Jasinowski, A, Vassalos, D and Guarin, L. 2003. Time-based survival criteria for passenger Ro-Ro vessels. SNAME Mar Technol., 40(4): 278-287.
15. Karlsson, U. 2008. Structural integrity analysis of critical elements of ropax ships, dissertation Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
16. Karlsson, U, Ringberg, J W, Johnson, E, Hoseini, M and Ulvfarsson, A. 2009. Experimental and numerical investigation of bulb impact with a ship side-shell structure. Mar Technol., 46(1): 16-26.
17. Marciniak, Z, Duncan, JL, Hu SJ. 2002. Mechanics of sheet metal forming, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
18. Papanikolaou, A, ed. 2009. Risk-based ship design, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
19. Schreuder, M. 2005. Time simulation of the behaviour of damaged ships in waves [licentiate thesis], Gothenburg, Sweden: Deparment of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology.
20. Schreuder, M, Hogström, P, Ringsberg, J, Johnson, E and Jansson, C E. Holistic assessment of ship survivability and risk after damage. Computational methods in marine engineering III. International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering. June15-172009, Trondheim, Norway. Edited by: Kvamsdal, T, Pettersen, B, Bergan, P, Oñate, E and Garcia, J. Barcelona, Spain: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE).
21. Schreuder, M, Hogström, P, Ringsberg, J W, Johnson, E and Janson, C E. A holistic method for assessment of the survival time of a ship damaged by collision In press. Submitted for publication in the Journal of Ship Research.
22. Tabri, K, Alsos, H, Broekhuijsen, J and Ehlers, S. 2007. "A benchmark study on ductile failure criteria for shell elements in multiaxial stress state". In Advancements in marine structures, Edited by: Soares, C G and Das, P K. 401-409. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
23. Törnqvist, R. 2003. Design of crashworthy ship structures, dissertation Kgns Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
24. Yamada, Y, Endo, H and Terndrup-Pedersen, P. Numerical study on the buffer bow structure in ship-ship collision. Proceedings of the 15th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. June19-242005, Seoul, Korea. Edited by: Chung, J S, Hong, S W, Koo, J, Komai, T and Koterayama, W. Cupertino, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).