Pre-organizing shape instances for landmark-based shape correspondence

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 210-228

  Munsell, Brent C ^a   Temlyakov, Andrew ^a   Styner, Martin ^b   Wang, Song ^a  

^a University of South Carolina   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Shape correspondence; Shape tree; Statistical shape analysis; Statistical shape modeling

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL METHODS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; POPULATION SIZES; SHAPE CORRESPONDENCE; SHAPE TREE; SHAPE VARIATIONS; STATISTICAL SHAPE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL; STATISTICAL SHAPES;

FORESTRY;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS; FORESTRY; MODELS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84859266354     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-011-0477-4     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amit, Y., & Geman, D. (1997). Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural Computation, 9, 1545-1588. (Pubitemid 127462804)
2. Basri, R., Costa, L., Geiger, D., & Jacobs, D. (1995). Determining the similarity of deformable shapes. Vision Research, 38, 135-143.
3. Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002). Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(24), 509-522. (Pubitemid 34448769)
4. Bookstein, F. (1989). Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(6), 567-585.
5. Bookstein, F. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bookstein, F. (1997). Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis, 1(3), 225-243. (Pubitemid 127502900)
7. Bruckstein, A., Katzir, N., Lindenbaum, M., & Porat, M. (1992). Similarity-invariant signatures for partially occluded planar shapes. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7(3), 271-285. (Pubitemid 23621963)
8. Catmull, E., & Rom, R. (1974). A class of local interpolating splines. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 317-326.
9. Chen, L., Feris, R., & Turk,M. (2008). Efficient partial shape matching using smith-waterman algorithm. In IEEE computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (pp. 1-6).
10. Cootes, T., Taylor, C., Cooper, D., & Graham, J. (1995). Active shape models-their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1), 38-59.
11. Cormen, T., Leiserson, C., & Rivest, R. (1990). Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Cristinacce, D., Butcher, N., & Cootes, T. (2008). Facial motion analysis using clustered shortest path tree registration. In International workshop on machine learning for vision-based motion analysis, European conference on computer vision (ECCV).
13. Dalal, P., Shi, F., Shen, D.,&Wang, S. (2010). Multiple cortical surface correspondence using pairwise shape similarity. In International conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (Vol. 1, pp. 349-358).
14. Davies, R. (2002). Learning shape: optimal models for analysing natural variability. Dissertation, University of Manchester.
15. Davies, R., Twining, C., Cootes, T., Waterton, J., & Taylor, C. (2002). A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(5), 525-537. (Pubitemid 34979829)
16. Davies, R., Twining, C., & Taylor, C. (2008). Statistical models of shape: optimization and evaluation. London: Springer.
17. DiIanni, M., Diekrnann, R., Laling, R., Schulze, J., & Tschoeke, S. (1996). Simulated annealing and genetic algorithms for shape detection. Control and Cybernetics, 25(1), 159-175.
18. Dryden, I., & Mardia, K. (1998). The statistical analysis of shape. London: Wiley.
19. Duta, N., & Sonka, M. (1998). Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images: an improved active shape model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(6), 1049-1062. (Pubitemid 128747763)
20. Frangi, A., Rueckert, D., Schnabel, J., & Niessen, W. (2001). Automatic 3D ASM construction via atlas-based landmarking and volumetric elastic registration. In Information processing in medical imaging conference (pp. 77-91).
21. Gertz, M. E., & Wright, S. J. (2001). Object-oriented software for quadratic programming. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 29, 58-81. (Pubitemid 40000552)
22. van Ginneken, B., Frangi, A., Staal, J., ter Haar Romeny, B., & Viergever, M. (2002). Active shape model segmentation with optimal features. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(8), 924-933. (Pubitemid 35476596)
23. Gonzalez-Jimenez, D., & Alba-Castro, J. (2007). Toward poseinvariant 2-D face recognition through point distribution models and facial symmetry. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2(3), 413-429. (Pubitemid 47290576)
24. Gower, J., & Dijksterhuis, G. (2004). Procrustes problems. London: Oxford University Press.
25. Heimann, T., & Meinzer, H. P. (2009). Statistical shape models for 3d medical image segmentation: a review. Medical Image Analysis, 13(4), 543-563.
26. Heimann, T., Wolf, I., Williams, T., & Meinzer, H. P. (2005). 3d active shape models using gradient descent optimization of description length. In Information processing in medical imaging conference (pp. 566-577). (Pubitemid 41425346)
27. Hill, A., & Taylor, C. J. (1994). Automatic landmark generation for point distribution models. In British machine vision conference (Vol. 2, pp. 429-438).
28. Karlsson, J., & Ericsson, A. (2006). A ground truth correspondence measure for benchmarking. In International conference on pattern recognition (Vol. 3, pp. 568-573). (Pubitemid 46553186)
29. Lanitis, A., Taylor, C., & Cootes, T. (1995). Automatic face identification system using flexible appearance models. Image and Vision Computing, 13(5), 393-401.
30. Latecki, L. J., Megalooikonomou, V., Wang, Q., & Yu, D. (2007). An elastic partial shape matching technique. Pattern Recognition, 40(11), 3069-3080. (Pubitemid 46990440)
31. Lekadir, K., Merrifield, R., & Yang, G. (2007). Outlier detection and handling for robust 3-D active shape models search. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 26(2), 212-222. (Pubitemid 46362764)
32. Leventon, M., Grimson, E., & Faugeras, O. (2000). Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 316-323).
33. Marsland, S., Twining, C., & Taylor, C. (2008). A minimum description length objective function for groupwise non-rigid image registration. Image and Vision Computing, 26(3), 333-346. (Pubitemid 350192033)
34. Matthews, S. B. I., & Schneider, J. (2004). Automatic construction of active appearance models as an image coding problem. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(10), 1380-1384.
35. Meier, D., & Fisher, E. (2002). Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21, 31-47. (Pubitemid 34138821)
36. Milborrow, S., & Nicolls, F. (2008). Locating facial features with an extended active shape model. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 504-513).
37. Munsell, B. C., Dalal, P., & Wang, S. (2008). Evaluating shape correspondence for statistical shape analysis: a benchmark study. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(11), 2023-2039.
38. Munsell, B., Temlyakov, A., & Wang, S. (2009). Fast multiple shape correspondence by pre-organizing shape instances. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 840-847).
39. Ozcan, E., & Mohan, C. K. (1997). Partial shape matching using genetic algorithms. Pattern Recognition Letters, 18, 987-992. (Pubitemid 127434127)
40. Powell, M. (1995). A thin plate spline method for mapping curves into curves in two dimensions. In Proc. computational techniques and applications (pp. 43-57).
41. Richardson, T., & Wang, S. (2005). Nonrigid shape correspondence using landmark sliding, insertion and deletion. In International conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (pp. II-435-442).
42. Rueckert, D., Frangi, A., & Schnabel, J. (2001). Automatic construction of 3D statistical deformation models using non-rigid registration. In International conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (pp. 77-84). (Pubitemid 33352399)
43. Saber, E., Xu, Y., & Tekalp, A. (2005). Partial shape representation by sub-matrix matching for partial matching guided image labeling. Pattern Recognition, 38, 1560,573.
44. Schmidt, F., Farin, D., & Cremers, D. (2007). Fast matching of planar shapes in sub-cubic runtime. In International conference on computer vision (pp. 1-6).
45. Seshadri, K., & Savvides, M. (2009). Robust modified active shape model for automatic facial landmark annotation of frontal faces. In IEEE international conference on biometrics: theory, applications and systems (pp. 1-8).
46. Shenton, M., Gerig, G., McCarley, R., Szvackely, G., & Kikinis, R. (2002). Amygdala-hippocampal shape differences in schizophrenia: the application of 3d shape models to volumetric MR data. Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging, 115, 15-35. (Pubitemid 34880096)
47. Styner, M., Rajamani, K., Nolte, L. P., Zsemlye, G., Szekely, G., Taylor, C., & Davies, R. (2003). Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building. In Information processing in medical imaging conference (pp. 63-75).
48. Thodberg, H. (2003). Minimum description length shape and appearance models. In Information processing in medical imaging conference (pp. 51-62).
49. Veltkamp, R.,&Hagedoorn, M. (1999). State of the art in shape matching. Tech. Rep. Technical Report UU-CS-1999-27, Utrecht.
50. Veltkamp, R., & Tanase,M. (2005). Part-based shape retrieval. In ACM multimedia (pp. 543-546).
51. Wang, S., Kubota, T., & Richardson, T. (2004). Shape correspondence through landmark sliding. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (Vol. 1, pp. 143-150).
52. Xie, J., & Heng, P. (2005). Shape modeling using automatic landmarking. In International conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (pp. II-709-716).