Quantifying time-inhomogeneous stochastic introgression processes with hazard rates

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 253-263

  Ghosh, Atiyo ^a   Serra, Maria Conceição ^b   Haccou, Patsy ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Branching process; Invasion; Random environment; Risk management; Transgene

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; GENE FLOW; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOCHASTICITY; WILD POPULATION;

ARTICLE; CROP; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PLANT GENE; PROBABILITY; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENE FLOW; GENES, PLANT; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84859265749     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bos P.M.J., Jan P-J, van Raaij M.T.M. Risk assessment of peak exposure to genotoxic carcinogens: a pragmatic approach. Toxicol. Lett. 2004, 151:43-50.
2. Demon I., Haccou P., van den Bosch F. Introgression of resistance genes between population: a model study of insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2007, 72:292-304.
3. Edmands S. Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:520-527.
4. Ellstrand N.C., Prentice H.C., Hancock J.F. Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 1999, 30:539-563.
5. Ghosh A., Haccou P. Quantifying stochastic introgression processes with hazard rates. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2010, 77:171-180.
6. Haccou P., Jagers P., Vatutin V.A. Branching Processes: Variation Growth and Extinction of Populations 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Hails R.S., Morley K. Genes invading new populations: a risk assessment perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:245-252.
8. Haygood R., Ives A.R., Andow D.A. Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:1879-1896.
9. Haygood R., Ives A.R., Andow D.A. Population genetics of transgene containment. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:213-220.
10. Jagers P., Klebaner F.C. Population-size-dependent and age-dependent branching processes. Stochastic Process. Appl. 2000, 87:235-254.
11. Kalbfleisch J.D., Prentice R.L. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York. second ed.
12. Kelly C.K., Bowler M.J., Breden F., Fenner M., Poppy G.M. An analytical model assissing the potential threat to natural habitats from insect resistance transgenes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:1759-1767.
13. Maan, S.S, Interspecific and intergeneric hybridisation in wheat, In: Heyne, E.G. (Ed.), Wheat and Wheat Improvement. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison,1987 pp.453-461.
14. Michor F., Nowak M.A., Iwasa Y. Stochastic dynamics of metastatis formation. J. Theoret. Biol. 2006, 240:521-530.
15. Reluga T., Meza R., Walton D.B., Galvani A.P. Reservoir interactions and disease emergence. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2007, 72:400-408.
16. Riesberg L.H., Wendel J.F. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process 1993, 70-109. Oxford University Press, Oxford. R.G. Harrison (Ed.).
17. Serra M.C., Haccou P. Dynamics of escape mutants. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2007, 72:167-178.
18. Snow A.A., Andersen B., Jorgensen R.B. Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weed B. Rapa. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8:605-615.
19. Thompson C.J., Thompson B.J.P., Ades P.K., Cousens R., Carinier-Gere P., Landman K., Newbigin E., Burgman M.A. Model-based analysis of the likelihood of gene introgression from genetically modified crops into wild relatives. Ecol. Model. 2003, 162:199-209.
20. Welliver R. The relationship of meteorological conditions to the epidemic activity of respiratory syncytial virus. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2009, 10:6-8.