Using work domain analysis to evaluate the impact of technological change on the performance of complex socio-technical systems

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Jenkins, Daniel P ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^b   Salmon, Paul M ^c   Walker, Guy H ^d  

^a Sociotechnic Solutions Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cognitive work analysis; command and control; evaluation; socio technical; work domain analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859257225     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639220903353401     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. British Defence Film Library. 2001. Film. Armoured Battle group in the Quick Attack # C003/00. Gerards Cross, Bucks: British Defence Film Library.
2. Burns, C.M., Bryant, D.J., and Chalmers, B.A., 2000. A work domain model to support shipboard command and control. International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000. Nashville, TN: IEEE, 2228-2233
3. Burns, CM and Hajdukiewicz, JR. 2004. Ecological interface design, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
4. CAST. 2007. The combat estimate, Warminster: Combined Armed Staff Trainer Guide, Land Warfare Centre.
5. Chin, M., Sanderson, P., and Watson, M., 1999. Cognitive work analysis of the command and control work domain. Proceedings of the 1999 command and control research and technology symposium. Newport, RI: United States Naval War College
6. Crandall, B., Klein, G.A., and Hoffman, R.R., 2006. Working minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
7. Crone, D.J., Sanderson, P.M., and Naikar, N., 2003. Using cognitive work analysis to develop a capability for the evaluation of future systems. Proceedings of the 47th annual meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Denver, CO. Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 1938-1942
8. Crone, D. 2007. Selecting sensitive measures of performance in complex multivariable environments. Proceedings of the 2007 simulation technology conference (SimTecT 2007). Brisbane. 4-7 June 20072007, Australia.
9. Cummings, ML and Guerlain, S. 2003. The tactical Tomahawk conundrum: designing decision support systems for revolutionary domains. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society conference. October 20032003, Washington DC.
10. Hoffman, RR and Woods, DD. 2000. Studying cognitive systems in context. Human Factors, 42: 1-7.
11. Jenkins, DP. 2007a. The cognitive work analysis tool V0.95, Yeovil Somerset: Human Factors Integration Defence Technology Centre.
12. Jenkins, DP. 2007b. "The development of a cognitive work analysis tool". In Engin. Psychol. and Cog. Ergonomics, HCII 2007, LNAI 4562 Edited by: Harris, D. 504-511. Berlin: Springer.
13. Jenkins, DP. 2008a. Using work domain analysis to evaluate the impact of digitization on command and control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. September 20082008a, New York. Santa Monica. CA: HFES
14. Jenkins, DP. 2008b. Using cognitive work analysis to explore activity allocation within military domains. Ergonomics, 51(6): 798-781.
15. Jenkins, DP. 2008c. Applying cognitive work analysis to the design of rapidly reconfigurable interfaces in complex networks. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(4): 273-295.
16. Jenkins, DP. 2009. Cognitive work analysis: Coping with complexity, Aldershot: Ashgate.
17. Jones, DG. Situation awareness requirements for the future objective force. Paper presented at the collaborative technology alliances symposium. 29 April-1 May2003, College Park, MD.
18. Kleiner, BM. 2002. Macroergonomic analysis and design (MEAD) of work system processes. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th annual meeting. 2002, Santa Monica, CA. pp.1365-1369. HFES.
19. Kleiner, BM. 2008. Macroegonomics: work system analysis and design. Human Factors, 50(3): 461-467.
20. Lamoureux, TM. 2006. Control task analysis in applied settings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th annual meeting. 20062006, Santa Monica, CA. HFES. 391-395
21. Lintern, G. 2004. Asymmetric adversary analysis for intelligent preparation of the battlespace (A3-IPB), United States Air Force Research Department Report
22. Majchrzak, A and Gasser, L. 1992. HITOP-A: a tool to facilitate interdisciplinary manufacturing systems design. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 2(3): 255-276.
23. Meister, D. 1985. Behavioral analysis and measurement methods, New York: Wiley.
24. Muckler, FA and Seven, SA. 1992. Selecting performance measures: 'Objective' versus 'subjective' measurement. Human Factors, 34(4): 441-455.
25. Naikar, N and Lintern, G. 2002. A review of 'Cognitive Work Analysis: towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work' by Kim J. Vicente. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12(4): 391-400.
26. Naikar, N and Sanderson, PM. 2001. Evaluating design proposals for complex systems with work domain analysis. Human Factors, 43: 529-542.
27. Naikar, N and Saunders, A. 2003. Crossing the boundaries of safe operation: a technical training approach to error management. Cognition Technology and Work, 5: 171-180.
28. Naikar, N. 2003. Technique for designing teams for first-of-a-kind complex systems with cognitive work analysis: case study. Human Factors, 45(2): 202-217.
29. Rasmussen, J. 1985. The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15: 234-243.
30. Rasmussen, J, Pejtersen, A and Goodstein, LP. 1994. Cognitive systems engineering, New York: Wiley.
31. Shepherd, A. 1985. Hierarchical task analysis and training decisions. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 22: 162-176.
32. Stanton, NA. 2006. Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics, 37: 55-79.
33. Vicente, KJ. 1999. Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Xu, W. 2007. Identifying problems and generating recommendations for enhancing complex systems: applying the abstraction hierarchy framework as an analytical tool. Human Factors, 49(6): 975-994.
35. Zsambok, CE and Klein, G eds. 1997. Naturalistic decision making, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.