Supervision and cultural difference: Rethinking institutional pedagogies

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 351-354

  Grant, Barbara ^a   Manathunga, Catherine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859253637     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2011.617084     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Frow, J. 1988. Discipline and discipleship. Textual Practice, 2: 307-323.
2. Grant, B.M. 2005. Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3): 337-354.
3. Green, B. 2005. Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2): 151-163.
4. Lusted, D. 1986. Why pedagogy?. Screen, 27(5): 2-14.
5. Manathunga, C. 2009. Research as an intercultural 'contact zone'. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(2): 165-177.
6. McWilliam, E. and Palmer, P. 1995. Teaching tech(no)bodies: Open learning and postgraduate pedagogy. The Australian Universities' Review, 35(2): 32-34.
7. O'Rourke, B. (1997). What is supervision? Teaching Review (March), pp. 26-40. Canberra: CELT, The University of Canberra.
8. Rancière, J. 1991. The ignorant schoolmaster, Stanford: Stanford University Press.