Do 70 Per Cent of All Organizational Change Initiatives Really Fail?

Journal of Change Management

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 451-464

  Hughes, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

evaluation; failure; Organizational change; success

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859224620     PISSN: 14697017     EISSN: 14791811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14697017.2011.630506     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ackman, D. 2002. Excellence sought-and found. Forbes, April 10 2002, pp. 1-2 Available at http://www.forbes.com/2002/10/04/1004excellent.html (accessed 27 June 2011)
2. Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D. and Barnett, W. P. 1993. Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1): 51-73.
3. Aupperle, K. E., Acar, W. and Booth, D. E. 1986. An empirical critique of in search of excellence: how excellent are the excellent companies?. Journal of Management, 12(4): 499-512.
4. Balogun, J. 2006. Managing change: steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Planning, 39(1): 29-49.
5. Balogun, J. and Hope Hailey, V. 2008. Exploring Strategic Change, 3, Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.
6. Bashien, B., Markus, M. L. and Riley, P. 1994. Business proccess re-engineering: preconditions for success and failure. Information Systems Management, 11(Spring): 7-13.
7. Beer, M. 2000. "Research that will break the code of change: the role of useful normal science and usable action science, a commentary on Van de Ven and Argyris". In Breaking the Code of Change, Edited by: Beer, M. and Nohria, and N. 429-446. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. (2000b)
8. Beer, M. and Nohria, N. 2000a. Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3): 133-141.
9. Beer, M. and Nohria, N. 2000b. Breaking the Code of Change, Edited by: Beer, M. and Nohria, N. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A. and Spencer, B. 1990. Why change programs don't produce change. Harvard Business Review, 68(6): 158-166.
11. Binney, G. and Williams, C. 1995. Leaning into the Future: Changing the way People Change Organisations, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
12. Boeker, W. 1997. Strategic change: the influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 152-170.
13. Boje, D. 2001. Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research, London: Sage.
14. Bovey, W. H. and Hede, A. 2001. Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanisms. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(7): 534-548.
15. Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. 2008. Power, Politics and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game, 2, London: Sage.
16. Buchanan, D., Fitzgerald, L., Ketley, D., Gollop, R., Jones, J. L., Lamont, S. S. and Whitby, E. 2005. No going back: a review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3): 189-205.
17. Business Week (1984) Who's excellent now? 5 November, Issue 2867, pp. 74-86.
18. Butler, J., Scott, F. and Edwards, J. 2003. Evaluating organizational change: the role of ontology and epistemology. TAMARA Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 2(2): 55-67.
19. Carnall, C. A. 1986. Toward a theory for the evaluation of organizational change. Human Relations, 39(8): 745-766.
20. Collins, D. 2007. Narrating the Management Guru: In Search of Tom Peters, London: Routledge.
21. Collins, D. and Rainwater, K. 2005. Managing change at Sears: a sideways look at a tale of corporate transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(1): 16-30.
22. Cooke, B. 1999. Writing the left out of management theory: the historiography of the management of change. Organization, 6(1): 81-105.
23. Dawson, P. 2003. Understanding Organizational Change: The Contemporary Experience of People at Work, London: Sage.
24. Doyle, M. 2001. Dispersing change agency in high velocity change organisations: issues and implications. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(7): 321-329.
25. Doyle, M., Claydon, T. and Buchanan, D. 2000. Mixed results, lousy process: the management experience of organizational change. British Journal of Management, 11(Special Issue): S59-S80.
26. Gabriel, Y. 2000. Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions and Fantasies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. George, J. M. and Jones, G. R. 2000. The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26(4): 657-684.
28. Guest, D. (1992) Right enough to be dangerously wrong: an analysis of the 'in search of excellence' phenomenon, in: G. Salaman (ed.), Human Resource Strategies, pp. 1-19 (London: Sage).
29. Hall, G., Rosenthal, J. and Wade, J. 1993. How to make reengineering really work. Harvard Business Review, 71(6): 119-131.
30. Hammer, M. 1990. Reengineering work: don't automate-obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4): 104-12.
31. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution, London: Nicholas Brearly.
32. Hammer, M. and Stanton, S. A. 1995. The Reengineering Revolution: a Handbook, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
33. Hardy, C. 1996. Understanding power: bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7(Special Issue): S3-S16.
34. Handy, C. 1994. The Empty Raincoat: Making Sense of the Future, London: Random House UK.
35. Hope Hailey, V. and Balogun, J. 2002. Devising context sensitive approaches to change: the example of Glaxo Wellcome. Long Range Planning, 35(2): 153-178.
36. Kelemen, M., Forrester, P. and Hassard, J. 2000. "BPR and TQM: divergence or convergence?". In The Reengineering Revolution: Critical Studies of Corporate Change, Edited by: Knights, D. and Willmott, and H. 154-173. London: Sage.
37. Keller, S. and Aiken, C. 2009. The inconvenient truth about change management. McKinsey and Company, Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/App_Media/Reports/Financial_Services/The_Inconvenient_Truth_About_Change_Management.pdf (accessed 4 July 2011)
38. Kotter, J. P. 1995. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2): 59-67.
39. Kotter, J. P. 2008. A Sense of Urgency, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
40. Lewin, K. 1947. "Frontiers in group dynamics, in; D. Cartwright (ed.), (1952)". In Field Theory in Social Science, 301-336. London: Social Science Paperbacks.
41. McKinsey and Company. 2006. Organizing for successful change management: a McKinsey global survey. The Mckinsey Quarterly, July, pp. 1-8. Available at http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Organization/Change_Management/Organizing_for_successful_change_management_A_McKinsey_Global_Survey_1809 (accessed 13 November 2010)
42. Pace, S. and Mulvin, G. 2002. Managing change: strategies that work. Bain and Company, Available at http://www.bain.com/bainweb/publications/publications_detail.asp?id=10331&menu_url=publications_results.asp (accessed on 13 November 2010)
43. Palmer, I., Dunford, R. and Akin, G. 2009. Managing Organizational Change: a Multiple Perspectives Approach, Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
44. Peters, T. J. and Waterman, R. H. 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Companies, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
45. Pettigrew, A. M. 1985. The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI, Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Pettigrew, A. M. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267-292.
47. Pettigrew, A. M. 2000. "Linking change processes to outcomes: a commentary on Ghoshal, Bartlett and Weick". In Breaking the Code of Change, Edited by: Beer, M. and Nohria, and N. 243-265. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. (2000)
48. Rucci, A., Kirn, S. and Quinn, R. 1998. The employee-customer profit chain at Sears. Harvard Business Review, 76(1): 82-97.
49. Schwarz, G. M. 2003. Book review of breaking the code of change. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(1): 85-87.
50. Schwarz, G. M. and Huber, G. P. 2008. Challenging organizational change research. British Journal of Management, 19(Special Issue): S1-S6.
51. Senturia, T., Flees, L. and Maceda, M. 2008. Leading change management requires sticking to the plot. Bain and Company, Available at http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/leading-change-management-requires-sticking-to-the-plot.aspx (accessed 4 July 2011)
52. Spector, B. and Beer, M. 1994. Beyond TQM programmes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(2): 63-70.
53. Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. 2002. On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5): 567-582.
54. Vakola, M. and Nikolaou, I. 2005. Attitudes towards organizational change: what is the role of employees' stress and commitment?. Employee Relations, 27(2): 160-174.
55. Van de Ven, A. H. and Poole, M. S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 510-540.
56. Van de Ven, A. H. and Poole, M. S. 2005. Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26(9): 1377-1404.
57. Walston, S. L. and Chadwick, C. 2003. Perceptions and misperceptions of major organizational changes in hospitals: do change efforts fail because of inconsistent organizational perceptions of restructuring and reengineering?. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(14): 1581-1605.
58. Weick, K. E. and Quinn, R. 1999. Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 361-386.
59. Zammuto, R. F. 2001. Book review of breaking the code of change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 796-798.