The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media

Social Movement Studies

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 341-366

  Boykoff, Jules ^a   Laschever, Eulalie ^b  

^a PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

framing; framing contests; mass media; Tea Party Movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859223788     PISSN: 14742837     EISSN: 14742829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2011.614104     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ahlers, D. 2006. News consumption and the New Electronic Media. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(1): 29-52.
2. Ariens, C. (2010) The scoreboard, Nielsen Media Research, [online] Available at http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/the-scoreboard-monday-april-12_b24846 (accessed 15 October 2010)
3. Armey, D. and Kibbe, M. 2010. Give Us Liberty: A Tea Party Manifesto, New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
4. Barakso, M. and Schaffner, B. F. 2006. Winning coverage: News media portrayals of the Women's Movement, 1969-2004. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(4): 22-44.
5. Bennett, W. L. 2002. News: The Politics of Illusion, 5th ed., New York, NY: Longman.
6. Boykoff, J. 2006a. The Suppression of Dissent: How the State and Mass Media Squelch US American Social Movements, New York/London: Routledge.
7. Boykoff, J. 2006b. Framing dissent: Mass-media coverage of the Global Justice Movement. New Political Science, 28(2): 201-228.
8. Boykoff, J. 2007. Limiting dissent: The mechanisms of state repression in the United States. Social Movement Studies, 6(3): 281-310.
9. Boykoff, M. T. and Boykoff, J. M. 2007. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case study of U.S. mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6): 1190-1204.
10. Bronstein, C. 2005. Representing the Third wave: Mainstream print media framing of a New Feminist Movement. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4): 783-803.
11. CBS News and New York Times Poll (2010) The Tea Party movement: Who they are, April 5-12, 2010, CBS News and New York Times, [online] Available at http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/poll_tea_party_who_they_are_041410.pdf?tag=contentMain;contentBody (accessed 6 February 2011)
12. Castells, M. 2005. Global governance and global politics. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(1): 9-16.
13. Cottle, S. 2008. Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent. Media, Culture, & Society, 30(6): 853-872.
14. D'Angelo, P. 2002. News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4): 870-888.
15. Diamond, S. 1995. Roads to Dominion: Right-Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States, New York/London: The Guilford Press.
16. Diamond, S. 1998. Not By Politics Alone: The Enduring Influence of the Christian Right, New York, NY/London: The Guilford Press.
17. Entman, R. W. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58.
18. Entman, R. W. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Flowers, J. F., Haynes, A. A. and Crespin, M. H. 2003. The media, the campaign, and the message. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2): 259-273.
20. Gamson, W. 2004. "Bystanders, public opinion, and the media". In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Edited by: Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. 242-261. London: Blackwell Publishing.
21. Gardner, A. (2010) Tea Party Groups Say Media Have Been Fair, Survey Finds, Washington Post, October 26
22. Gitlin, T. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23. Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
24. Graham, M. 2010. That's No Angry Mob, That's My Mom: Team Obama's Assault on Tea-Party, Talk-Radio Americans, Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc.
25. Hallin, D. 1986. The Uncensored War, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Hart, P. & Rendall, S. (2010) Journalists {black heart suit} tea party: At last a citizen movement the corporate media can love, Extra!, May 26,pp. 7-8
27. Jeffries, J. L., ed. 2007. "Comrades: A Local History of the Black Panther Party". Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
28. Judis, J. B. (2010) Tea minus zero: The Tea Party menace will not go quietly, The New Republic, May 27pp. 18-21
29. Klein, A. G., Byerly, C. M. and McEachern, T. M. 2009. Counterframing public dissent: An analysis of antiwar coverage in the U.S. media. Critical Studies in Media, 26(4): 331-350.
30. Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. 1999. "Ethic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in Germany and Italy". In How Social Movements Matter, Edited by: Giugni, M., McAdam, D. and Tilly, C. 225-251. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
31. Krugman, P. (2009) Tea Party Forever, New York Times, April 12
32. Lawrence, R. 2010. "Researching political news framing: Established ground and new horizons". In Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Edited by: D'Angelo, P. and Kuypers, J. A. 265-285. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Mayer, J. (2010) Covert operations: The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama, New Yorker, August 30
34. McAdam, D. 1996. "The framing function of movement tactics: Strategic dramaturgy in the Civil Rights Movement". In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Edited by: McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. 338-355. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. McVeigh, R. 2009. The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-Wing Movements and National Politics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36. Media Research Center (2010) Tea Party: Conservative protesters hit with hostile & crude media response, [online] Available at http://www.mediaresearch.org/static/profiles/teaparties/Crudemediaresponse.aspx (accessed: 22 November 2010)
37. Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A. 2004. The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America, London: Penguin Books.
38. Nelson, T. E. and Oxley, Z. M. 1999. Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61(4): 1040-1067.
39. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A. and Oxley, Z. M. 1997. Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3): 567-583.
40. Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. O'Hara, J. M. 2010. A New American Tea Party: The Counterrevolution Against Bailouts, Handouts, Reckless Spending, and More Taxes, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
42. Pew Research Center for The People & the Press (2009) Press Accuracy Rating Hits Two-decade Low: Public Evaluations of the News Media, 1985-2009, [online] Available at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1341/press-accuracy-rating-hits-two-decade-low (accessed 22 November 2010)
43. Rasmussen, S. and Schoen, D. 2010. Mad as Hell: How the Tea Party Movement is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System, New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
44. Rauch, J., Chitrapu, S., Eastman, S. T., Evans, J. C., Paine, C. and Mwesige, P. 2007. From Seattle 1999 to New York 2004: A longitudinal analysis of journalistic framing of the movement for democratic globalization. Social Movement Studies, 6(2): 131-145.
45. Reese, S. D. 2007. The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57: 148-154.
46. Reinsborough, P. and Canning, D. 2010. Re:Imagining Change: How to Use Story-based Strategy to Win Campaigns, Build Movements, and Change the World, Oakland, CA: PM Press.
47. Rhodes, J. 2007. Framing the Black Panthers: The Spectacular Rise of a Black Power Icon, New York, NY: The New Press.
48. Riffe, D., Lacy, S. and Fico, F. G. 1998. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Rohlinger, D. A. and Quadagno, J. 2009. Framing faith: Explaining cooperation and conflict in the US conservative Christian political movement. Social Movement Studies, 8(4): 341-358.
50. Rosie, M. and Gorringe, H. 2009. 'The Anarchists' World Cup': Respectable protest and media panics. Social Movement Studies, 8(1): 35-53.
51. Ryan, C. 1991. Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing, Boston, MA: South End Press.
52. Scheufele, D. A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1): 103-122.
53. Scheufele, B. 2004. Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications, 29(4): 401-428.
54. Small, M. 1994. Covering Dissent: The Media and the Vietnam War Movement, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
55. Snow, D. A, Vliegenthart, R. and Corrigall-Brown, C. 2007. Framing the French riots: A comparative study of frame variation. Social Forces, 86(2): 385-415.
56. Taibbi, M. (2010) Tea and Crackers, Rolling Stone, October 3
57. Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58. Washington Post Canvass (2010) An Up-Close Look at the Tea Party and its Role in the Midterm Elections, [online] (24 October 2010) Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/tea-party-canvass/ (accessed 22 November 2010)
59. Williamson, V., Skocpol, T. and Coggin, J. 2011. The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican Conservatism. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1): 25-43.
60. Winter, N. 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas about Race & Gender Shape Public Opinion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Zernike, K. 2010. Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America, New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.