I-Pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture

European Journal of Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 56-67

  van Zoonen, Liesbet ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

knowledge; media; power; trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859222925     PISSN: 02673231     EISSN: 14603705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267323112438808     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aarts K,Van der Kolk H.Understanding the Dutch 'no'. The Euro, the East and the elite.PS: Political Science and Politics. 2006;39 (2): 243-246.
2. Ang I.Feminist desire and female pleasure. On Janice Radway's Reading the Romance.Camera Obscura. 1988;16:179-190.
3. Bale T,Green-Peders C,Krouwel A, et al.If you can't beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe.Political Studies. 2010;58 (3): 410-426.
4. Beck URisk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage; 1992 [1986/]:.
5. Bosman MDe schijn-elite van de valsemunters. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker; 2010:.
6. Carpentier N,De Cleen B.Contesting the populist claim on 'the people' through popular culture: The 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang.Social Semiotics. 2010;20 (2): 175-196.
7. Coleman S.How the other half votes: Big Brother viewers and the 2005 British general election campaign.International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2006;9 (4): 457-480.
8. Couldry NWhy Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neo-liberalism. London: Routledge; 2010:.
9. De JongS (2010) Willen de echte Henk en Ingrid opstaan?NRC Handelsblad, 27April. Available at: weblogs.nrc.nl/opklaringen/2010/04/27/willen-de-echte-henk-en-ingrid-opstaan/ (accessed 19 July 2011).
10. Dovey JFreakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television. London: Pluto Press; 2000:.
11. Duits L,Van Zoonen L.Headscarves and porno-chic: Disciplining girls' dress in the European multicultural society.The European Journal of Women's Studies. 2007;13 (2): 103-117.
12. Ferrara AAuthenticity in Culture, Self and Society. Vanini PWilliams JP, ed. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing; 2009:21-36.
13. FurediF (2007) The only thing we have to fear is the culture of fear itself. Spiked, 4April. Available at: www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/3053/ (accessed 11 July 2011).
14. Gamson WTalking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.
15. Giddens AConsequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990:.
16. Gilmore J,Pine JAuthenticity: What Consumers Really Want. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2007:.
17. Giroux HDisturbing Pleasures: Learning Popular Culture. London: Routledge; 1994:.
18. GloverJ (2007) Poll reveals how trust in BBC has plummeted after scandals: Most viewers find commercial rivals as believable as corporation. The Guardian, 28July. Available at: www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/jul/28/broadcasting.bbc (accessed 20 May 2011).
19. Graber DProcessing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman; 1988:.
20. Hajer MAuthoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
21. Harding S.A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory controversiality.Hypatia. 1994;19 (1): 25-47.
22. HardingA (2010) 5 ways of looking at 'Sarah Palin Feminism'. Jezebel, 26May. Available at: jezebel.com/5548464/5-ways-of-looking-at-sarah-palin-feminism (accessed 18 July 2011).
23. Hermes JReading Women's Magazines: An Analysis of Everyday Media Use. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1995:.
24. Klayman JPsychology of Learning and Motivation. Busemeyer JHastie JMedin DL, ed. London: Academic Press; 1995:385-418.
25. Lasch CThe Culture of Narcissism. New York: WW Norton and Company; 1979:.
26. Livingstone STelevision and Common Knowledge. Grisprud J, ed. London: Routledge; 1999:91-107.
27. MacIntyre AAfter Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 1981:.
28. Master Z,Resnik D.Hype and public trust in science.Science and Engineering Ethics. 2011;:.
29. The Media and Neo-populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Mazzoleni GStewart JHorsfield B, ed. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers; 2003:.
30. Papacharissi ZRoutledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Chadwick A, ed. London: Routledge; 2009:230-245.
31. PelsD (2007) Faces of Europe. Searching for leadership in a new political style. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, WRR [Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy]. Webpublications 17, The Hague. Available at: www.wrr.nl/dsc?c=getobject&s=obj&!sessionid=1oWMdBXGwqyBTagM31UqYyWRZ1zySvobBeqys3l54qVBDU@p5G78L9!zmM!2Az1F&objectid=4058&!dsname=default&isapidir=/gvisapi/ (accessed 18 July 2011).
32. Pew Research Centre (2010) Distrust, discontent, anger and partisan rancor: The people and their government. Available at: pewresearch.org/pubs/1569/trust-in-government-distrust-discontent-anger-partisan-rancor (accessed 13 December 2011).
33. Radway JReading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press; 1984:.
34. Reinharz SFeminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992:.
35. Rose J.Margaret Thatcher and Ruth Ellis.New Formations. 1988;6:.
36. RusselM (2010) The independent climate change e-mails review. Available at: www.cce-review.org/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf (accessed 19 May 2011).
37. Sennett RThe Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf; 1977:.
38. StoneP (2005) It's not Dan Rather, rather it's US journalism. Available at: www.astonesthrow.ch/analysis_rather.htm (accessed 20 May 2011).
39. Van Santen R,Van Zoonen L.Personalisering en popularisering in de politiek. Een conceptuele verkenning.Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap. 2009;37 (2): 155-176.
40. Van Zoonen LEntertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield; 2005:.
41. Van Zoonen L.The personal, the political and the popular: A woman's guide to celebrity politics.European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2006;9 (3): 287-301.
42. Van Zoonen L,Aslama M.Understanding Big Brother: An analysis of current research.European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2006;9 (3): 85-96.
43. Van ZoonenLVisFMiheljS (2011) YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media and Society. Available at: nms.sagepub.com/content/early/recent (accessed 19 July 2011).
44. Van Zoonen L,Alinejad D,Dekker M, et al.Dr. Phil meets the candidates. How family life produces political discussion.Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2007;24 (4): 322-339.
45. WildersG (n.d.) at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11469579 (accessed 26 January 2012).