Popularization and personalization in political communication;Stand van de Wetenschap Popularisering en personalisering in politieke communicatie

Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 155-176

  van Santen, Rosa ^a   van Zoonen, Liesbet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Personalization; Political communication; Popular culture; Popularization; Video malaise

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953825476     PISSN: 13846930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1347/tijd.37.2.155     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anker, H. (1992). Normal Vote Analysis. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
2. Barnett, S. (1998). Dumbing Down or Reaching Out: Is it Tabloidisation wot done it? The Political Quarterly, 69(b): 75-90.
3. Bartle, J. & I. Crewe (2002). The Impact of party Leaders in Britain: Strong Assumptions, Weak Evidence. In A. King (red.), Leader' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections (pp. 70-95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Blumler, J.G. (1999). Political communication systems all change: A response to Kees Brants. European Journal of Communication, 14(2): 241-249.
5. Blumler, J.G. & D. Kavanagh (1999). The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16(3): 209-230.
6. Brants, K. (1998). Who's afraid of infotainment? European Journal of Communication, 13(3): 315-335.
7. Brants, K. (1999). A Rejoinder to Jay G. Blumler. European Journal of Communication, 14(3): 411-415.
8. Brants, K. & P. Neijens (1998). The Infotainment of Politics. Political Communication, 15(2): 149-164.
9. Brants, K. & P. Van Praag (red.) (1995). Verkoop van de politiek. De verkiezingscampagne van 1994. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
10. Brants, K. & P. Van Praag (red.) (2005). Politiek en media in verwarring. De verkiezingscampagnes in het lange jaar 2002. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
11. Brettschneider, F. & O.W. Gabriel (2002). The Nonpersonalization of Voting Behavior in Germany. In A. King (red.), Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections (pp. 127-157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Buckingham, D. (1997). News Media, Political Socialization and Popular Citizenship: Towards a New Agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14(4): 344.
13. Bucy, E.P. & M.E. Grabe (2007). Taking Television Seriously: A Sound and Image Bite Analysis of Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1992-2004. Journal of Communication, 57(4): 652-675.
14. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1): 2-16.
15. Capella, J. N. & K.H. Jamieson (1997). Spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Coleman, S. (2003). A Tale of Two Houses: The House of Commons, the Big Brother House and the People at Home. Parliamentary Affairs, 2003(56): 733-758.
17. Coleman, S. (2006). How the other half votes: Big Brother viewers and the 2005 general election. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(4): 457-479.
18. Corner, J.R. (2000). Mediated persona and political culture: Dimensions of structure and process. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(3): 386-402.
19. Deuze, M. (2005). Popular journalism and professional ideology: tabloid reporters and editors speak out. Media Culture Society, 27(6): 861-882.
20. Duits, L. & L. van Zoonen (2008). 40 dagen zonder seksualiseringsdebat. Socialisme en Democratie, 6: 21-28.
21. Elchardus, M. (2002). De dramademocratie. Antwerpen: Lannoo.
22. Galvan, J.L. (2006). Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
23. Grabe, M.E., S. Zhou & B. Barnett (2001). Explicating Sensationalism in Television News: Content and the Bells and Whistles of Form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4): 635-655.
24. Hallin, D.C. (1992a). Sound bite democracy. Wilson Quarterly, 16(2): 34-37.
25. Hallin, D.C. (1992b). Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication, 42(2): 5-24.
26. Harrington, S. (2008). Popular news in the 21st century Time for a new critical approach? Journalism, 9(3): 266-284.
27. Hart, R. (1994). Seducing America. How television charms the modern voter. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Hart, C. (1999). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination (Published in association with The Open University).
29. Hendriks Vettehen, P., K. Nuijten & J. Beentjes (2005). News in an Age of Competition: The Case of Sensationalism in Dutch Television News. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3): 282-295.
30. Hendriks Vettehen, P., K. Nuijten & J. Beentjes (2006). Research Note: Sensationalism in Dutch Current Affairs Programmes 1992-2001. European Journal of Communication, 21(2): 227-237.
31. Holsteyn, J. van & G.A. Irwin (red.). (1998). De wilde frisheid van limoenen. Leiden: DSWO Press.
32. Iyengar, S., H. Norpoth & K.S. Hahn (2004). Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells. The Journal of Politics, 66(1): 157-175.
33. Kaase, M. (1994). Is There Personalization in Politics? Candidates and Voting Behavior in Germany. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique, 15(3): 211-230.
34. Koole, R.A. (2006). Politiek en tegenpolitiek in de Nederlandse democratie. Politici, wetenschapper en journalisten in de ban van het populisme. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.
35. Langer, A.I. (2007). A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945-1999). Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3): 371-387.
36. Macdonald, M. (1998). Personalization in Current Affairs Journalism. Javnost-The Public, 5(3): 109-126.
37. Machin, D. & F. Papatheoderou (2002). Commercialization and Tabloid Televis ion in Southern Europe: Disintegration or Democratization of the Public Sphere? Journal of European Area Studies, 10(1): 31-48.
38. Mazzoleni, G. (2003). The Media and the Growth of Neo-Populism in Contemporary De-mocracies. In G. Mazzoleni, J. Stewart & B. Horsfield (red.), The Media and Neo-Populism (pp. 1-20). Westport: Praeger.
39. Miller, A.H., M.P. Wattenberg & O. Malanchuk (1986). Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. The American Political Science Review, 80(2): 521-540.
40. Morris, J.S. & R.A. Clawson (2005). Media Coverage of Congress in the 1990s: Scandals, Personalities, and the Prevalence of Policy and Process. Political Communication, 22(3), 297-313.
41. Moy, P., M.A. Xenos & V.K. Hess (2005). Communication and Citizenship: Mapping the Political Effects of Infotainment. Mass Communication & Society, 8(2): 111-131.
42. Newton, K. (2006). May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research, 45(2): 209-234.
43. Nisbett, R.E. & L.D. Ross (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44. Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle. Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Nuijten, C., P. Hendriks Vettehen, A. Peeters & J. Beentjes (2007). Over competitie in de televisienieuwsmarkt en sensationeel nieuws als publiekstrekker. Het Nederlandse televisienieuws in de periode 1980-2004. Mens & Maatschappij, 82(4): 316-337.
46. Örnebring, H. & A.M. Jönsson (2004). Tabloid journalism and the public sphere: a historical perspective on tabloid journalism. Journalism Studies, 5(3): 283-295.
47. Patterson, T.E. (1993). Out of Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
48. Patterson, T.E. (1996). Bad News, Bad Governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546: 97-108.
49. Patterson, T.E. & R.D. McClure (1976). The Unseeing Eye. The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
50. Pels, D. (2003). Aesthetic representation and political style: Re-balancing identity and difference in media democracy. In J. Corner & D. Pels (red.), Media and the restyling of politics. Londen: Sage.
51. Rahat, G. & T. Sheafer (2007). The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 24(1): 65-80.
52. RMO (2003). Advies 26. Medialogica. Over het krachtenveld tussen burgers, media en politiek. Den Haag: RMO.
53. Robinson, M.J. (1976). Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of 'The Selling of the Pentagon'. The American Political Science Review, 70(2): 409-432.
54. Russonello, J.M. & F. Wolf (1979). Newspaper Coverage of the 1976 and 1968 Presidential Campaigns. Journalism Quarterly, 56(2): 360-432.
55. Santen, R. van (2008). Review essay. Politics and entertainment: A happy marriage? Javnost-The public, 15(3): 89-100.
56. Sigelman, L. & D. Bullock (1991). Candidates, Issues, Horse Races, and Hoopla: Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1888-1988. American Politics Research, 19(1): 5-32.
57. Sparks, C. (2000). Introduction: The Panic over Tabloid News. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (red.), Tabloid Tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 1-40). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
58. Stanyer, J. (2008). Elected Representatives, Online Self-Presentation and the Personal Vote: Party, Personality and Webstyles in the United States and United Kingdom. Information, Communication & Society, 11(3): 414-432.
59. Stewart, J., G. Mazzoleni & B. Horsfield (2003). Conclusion: Power to the Media Managers. In G. Mazzoleni, J. Stewart & B. Horsfield (red.), The Media and Neo-Populism (pp. 215-239). Westport: Praeger.
60. Street, J. (1997). Politics and Popular Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
61. Uribe, R. & B. Gunter (2004). Research Note: The Tabloidization of British Tabloids. European Journal of Communication, 19(3): 387-402.
62. Vliegenthart, R., H.G. Boomgaarden & J.W. Boumans (2008). Personalisation in Political News Coverage: UK and the Netherlands, 1990-2007. Paper presented at the Leeds-Amsterdam conference Challenging the primacy of politics: Political communication in post-modern democracy. Retrieved 14-05-08.
63. Wattenberg, M.P. (1984). The Decline of American Political Parties 1952-1980. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Zoonen, L. van (2000a). The Personalization of Politics: Opportunities for Woman? Politics, Groups and the Individual: International Journal of Political Psychology and Political Socialization, 9(3-4): 19-35.
65. Zoonen, L. van (2000b). Popular Culture as Political Communication. An Introduction. Javnost-The Public, 7(2).
66. Zoonen, L. van (2004a). De direct gekozen burgemeester. Vier scenario's voor persoonlijke politiek. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
67. Zoonen, L. van (2004b). Nogmaals Oudkerk: waarom het persoonlijke politiek en het politieke persoonlijk moet zijn. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 7(2): 41-46.
68. Zoonen, L. van (2005). Entertaining the citizen. When politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
69. Zoonen, L. van (2006). The personal, the political and the popular: A woman's guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3): 287-301.