Investigating factors affecting the uptake of automated assessment technology

Journal of Information Technology Education:Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 161-181

  Dreher, Carl ^a   Reiners, Torsten ^a,b   Dreher, Heinz ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated assessment; Automated essay grading; constructivist grounded theory analysis; Educational assessment; Online survey

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; GRADING; JOB SATISFACTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS; SURVEYS; TEACHING;

AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT; AUTOMATED ESSAY GRADING; CONSTRUCTIVIST GROUNDED THEORY ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT; ONLINE SURVEYS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84859189752     PISSN: 15479714     EISSN: 15393585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/1492     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74
3. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Book 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman
4. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281
5. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). London: Sage
6. Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5, 1-35
7. Dreher, C., Reiners, T., Dreher, N., & Dreher, H. (2009). Virtual worlds as a context suited for information systems education: Discussion of pedagogical experience and curriculum design with reference to Second Life. Journal of Information Systems Education (JISE), 20, 211-224
8. Dreher, H. (2006). Interactive on-line formative evaluation of student assignments. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3, 189-197
9. Dreher, H., Dreher, N., & Reiners, T. (2008). Design and integration of an Automated Assessment Laboratory: Experiences and guide. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 2858-2863). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
10. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press
11. Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 309-334
12. Hulsart, R., & McCarthy, V. (2009). Educators' role in promoting academic integrity. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13, 49-60
13. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212-218
14. Livingston, K., & Condie, R. (2006). The impact of an online learning program on teaching and learning strategies. Theory into Practice, 45, 150-158
15. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218
16. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1-6
17. Ramsden, P., Masters, G., Stephanou, A., Walsh, E., Martin, E., Laurillardi, D., et al. (1993). Phenomeno-graphic research and the measurement of understanding: An investigation of students' conceptions of speed, distance, and time. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 301-316
18. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). London: Sage
19. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In L. Bickman & D. L. Rog (Eds.), The Sage handbook of applied social research methods (2nd ed., pp. 283-317). Los Angeles: Sage
20. Thompson, D., & McGregor, I. (2009). Online self- and peer assessment for groupwork. Education & Training, 51, 434-447
21. Williams, R. (2006). The power of Normalised Word Vectors for automatically grading essays. The Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3, 721-730
22. Williams, R., & Dreher, H. (2004). Automatically grading essays with Markit©. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 693-700