Fluid administration limited by lung sonography: The place of lung ultrasound in assessment of acute circulatory failure (the FALLS-protocol)

Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 155-162

  Lichtenstein, Daniel ^a  

^a HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ   (France)

Author keywords

acute circulatory failure; fluid responsiveness; hemodynamic assessment; lung ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CAVA VEIN; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; HEART VENTRICLE SIZE; HYPOVOLEMIA; HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK; LUNG ECHOGRAPHY; LUNG EDEMA; LUNG EMBOLISM; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPTIC SHOCK;

EID: 84859187065     PISSN: 17476348     EISSN: 17476356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/ers.12.13     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flowdirected balloon-tipped catheter. N. Engl. J. Med. 283, 447-451 (1970).
2. Mimoz O, Rauss A, Rekik N, Brun- Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill patients: a prospective analysis of outcome changes associated with catheter prompted changes in therapy. Crit. Care Med. 22, 573-579 (1994).
3. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 276, 889-897 (1996).
4. Boldt J. Volume therapy in the intensive care patient - we are still confused, but... Intensive Care Med. 26, 1181-1192 (2000).
5. Rhodes A, Cusack RJ, Newman PJ, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 28, 256-264 (2002).
6. Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N et al. French pulmonary artery catheter study group - early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 290, 2713-2720 (2003).
7. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 5-14 (2003).
8. Monnet X, Richard C, Teboul JL. The pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients. Does it change outcome? Minerva Anestesiol. 70, 219-224 (2004).
9. Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 294, 1664-1670 (2005).
10. Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K et al. Use of the pulmonary artery catheter is not associated with worse outcome in the ICU. Chest 128, 2722-2731 (2005).
11. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M et al. PAC-Man study collaboration. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366(9484), 472-477 (2005).
12. Gnaegi A, Feihl F, Perret C. Intensive care physicians insufficient knowledge of rightheart catheterization at the bedside: time to act? Crit. Care Med. 25, 213-220 (1997).
13. Squara P, Bennett D, Perret C. Pulmonary artery catheter: does the problem lie in the users? Chest 121, 2009-2015 (2002).
14. Pinsky MR, Vincent JL. Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit. Care Med. 33, 1119-1122 (2005).
15. Jardin F, Valtier B, Beauchet, Dubourg O, Bourdarias JP. Invasive monitoring combined with two-dimensional echocardiographic study in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 20, 550-554 (1994).
16. Benjamin E, Oropello JM, Stein JS. Transesophageal echocardiography in the management of the critically ill patient. Curr. Surg. 53, 137-141 (1996).
17. Tudor C, Denault A, Guimond JG et al. The hemodynamically unstable patient in the ICU: hemodynamic vs. transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring. Crit. Care Med. 30, 1214-1223 (2002).
18. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1734-1739 (2004).
19. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL et al. Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1182-1187 (2004).
20. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 31, 1195-1201 (2005).
21. Poelaert JI, Schupfer G. Hemodynamic monitoring utilizing transesophageal echocardiography: the relationships among pressure, flow, and function. Chest 127, 379-390 (2005).
22. Via G, Braschi A. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiovascular failure. Minerva Anesthesiol. 72, 495-501 (2006).
23. Price S, Nicol E, Gibson DG, Evans TW. Echocardiography in the critically ill: current and potential roles. Intensive Care Med. 32, 48-59 (2006).
24. Shoemaker WC. Oxygen transport and oxygen metabolism in shock and critical illness. Invasive and noninvasive monitoring of circulatory dysfunction and shock. Crit. Care Clin. 12, 939-969 (1996).
25. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 162, 134-138 (2000).
26. Pinsky MR. Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1008-1010 (2004).
27. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, Abiad M, Segal E, Coriat P. Assessing fluid responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: the respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth. Analg. 100, 942-945 (2005).
28. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 31, 1195-1201 (2005).
29. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 89, 1309-1310 (1998).
30. Pinsky MR. Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1008-1010 (2004).
31. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit. Care Med. 34, 1333-1337 (2006).
32. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit. Care 4, 282-289 (2000).
33. Pinsky MR, Payen D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit. Care 9, 566-572 (2005).
34. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews P et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 33, 575-590 (2007).
35. Pinsky MR. Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Clin. Chest Med. 24, 549-560 (2003).
36. Via G, Braschi A. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiovascular failure. Minerva Anesthesiol. 72, 495-501 (2006).
37. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1368-1377 (2001).
38. De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC et al. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 166, 98-104 (2002).
39. Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D et al. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 32, 1825-1831 (2004).
40. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign. International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 341, 17-60 (2008).
41. Abid O, Akca S, Haji-Michael P, Vincent JL. Strong vasopressor support may be futile in the intensive care unit patient with multiple organ failure. Crit. Care Med. 28, 947-949 (2000).
42. Braunwald E. Heart Disease. WB Saunders Company, PA, USA, 173 (1984).
43. Lichtenstein D. Ultrasound diagnosis of pulmonary edema. Rev. Im. Med. 6, 561-562 (1994).
44. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P, Gepner A, Barré O. The comet-tail artifact: an ultrasound sign of alveolar-interstitial syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156, 1640-1646 (1997).
45. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G. A lung ultrasound sign allowing bedside distinction between pulmonary edema and COPD: the comet-tail artifact. Intensive Care Med. 24, 1331-1334 (1998).
46. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure - the BLUE-protocol. Chest 134, 117-125 (2008).
47. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G. The BLUEpoints: three standardized points used in the BLUE-protocol for ultrasound assessment of the lung in acute respiratory failure. Crit. Ultrasound J. doi:10.1007/ s13089-011-0066-3 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
48. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Lagoueyte JF, Biderman P, Goldstein I, Gepner A. A-lines and B-lines: lung ultrasound as a bedside tool for predicting pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in the critically ill. Chest 136, 1014-1020 (2009).
49. Cholley BP, Payen D. Pulmonary artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2035-2037 (2003).
50. Flores ED, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Relation of mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Am. J. Cardiol. 66, 1532-1533 (1990).
51. Pinsky MR. Clinical significance of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Intensive Care Med. 29, 175-178 (2003).
52. Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, Papsdorf M. Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med. 24, 147-151 (1998).
53. Raper P, Sibbald WJ. Misled by the wedge? The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 89, 427-434 (1986).
54. Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth. Analg. 90, 351-355 (2000).
55. Pinsky MR. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Intensive Care Med. 29, 19-22 (2003).
56. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit. Care Med. 32, 691-699 (2004).
57. Osman D, Ridel C, Rey P et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit. Care Med. 35, 64-68 (2007).
58. Teboul JL, Asfar P, Bernardin G et al. Groupe d'experts de la SRLF recommandations d'experts de la SRLF. Indicateurs du remplissage vasculaire au cours de l'insuffisance circulatoire. Réanimation 13, 255-263 (2004).
59. Lemaire F, Brochard L. ARDS. In: Réanimation Médicale. Masson, Paris, France, 807-810 (2001).
60. Walley KR, Wood LDH. Ventricular dysfunction in critical illness. In: Principles of Critical Care (2nd Edition). Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH. McGraw Hill, NY, USA, 303-312 (1998).
61. Staub NC. Pulmonary edema. Physiol. Rev. 54, 678-811 (1974).
62. Chait A, Cohen HE, Meltzer LE, VanDurme JP. The bedside chest radiograph in the evaluation of incipient heart failure. Radiology 105, 563-566 (1972).
63. Rémy-Jardin M, Rémy J. OEdème interstitiel. In: Imagerie Nouvelle de la Pathologie Thoracique Quotidienne. Springer-Verlag, Paris, France 137-143 (1995).
64. Guyton CA, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology (9th Edition). WB Saunders Company, PA, USA, 496-497 (1996).
65. Gargani L, Lionetti V, Di Cristofano C et al. Early detection of acute lung injury uncoupled to hypoxemia in pigs using ultrasound lung comets. Crit. Care Med. 35, 2769-2774 (2007).
66. Lichtenstein D. Poumon. In: General Ultrasound in the Critically Ill (2nd Edition). Springer, NY, USA. 123-136 (2002).
67. Lichtenstein D. Limited investigation considering hemodynamic therapy (Chapter 23). In: Whole Body Ultrasound in the Critically Ill. Springer-Verlag, NY, USA, 223-242 (2010).
68. Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P. Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 6, 16 (2008).
69. Lichtenstein D, Jardin F. Noninvasive assessment of CVP using inferior vena cava ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava in the critically ill. Réanimation Urgences 3, 79-82 (1994).
70. Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmitt JM et al. Respiratory changes in IVC diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated, septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1740-1746 (2004).
71. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 32, 1832-1838 (2004).
72. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1734-1739 (2004).
73. Vieillard-Baron A, Slama M. Prise en charge hémodynamique du sepsis sévère et du choc septique à l'aide de l'échocardiographie. In: Echocardiographie Doppler chez le Patient en état Critique. Vignon P (Ed.). Elsevier SRLF, Paris, France 97-114 (2008).
74. van der Werf TS, Zijlstra JG. Ultrasound of the lung: just imagine. Intensive Care Med. 30, 183-184 (2004).