On strong attitudes and group deliberation: Relationships, structure, changes, and effects

Political Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 225-242

  Wojcieszak, Magdalena E ^a  

^a IE UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attitude importance; Attitude strength; Certainty; Deliberation; Extremity; Intensity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859163981     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00872.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abelson, R. (1995). Attitude extremity. In R. Petty & J. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 25-41). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bassili, J. (1993). Response latency versus certainty as indices of the strength of voting intentions in a CATI survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 54-61.
3. Bassili, J. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
4. Batson, C., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656-1666.
5. Boninger, D., Krosnick, J., & Berent, M. (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 61-80.
6. Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
7. Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality. Political Communication, 19, 73-93.
8. Cote, J., & Buckley, M. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Market Research, 24, 315-318.
9. Editors' Introduction. (2008). Political Psychology, 29, 145-147.
10. Erber, M., Hodges, S., & Wilson, T. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude stability, and the effects of analyzing reasons. In R. Petty & J. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 433-454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Fazio, R., & Williams, C. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
12. Finlay, K., & Stephan, W. (2000). Reducing prejudice: The effects of empathy on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1720-1737.
13. Fiorina, M., Abrams, S., & Pope, J. (2005). Culture wars? The myth of polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
14. Giner-Sorolla, R. (2001). Affective attitudes are not always faster: The moderating role of extremity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 666-677.
15. Graff, A. (2006). We are (not all) homophobes-a report from Poland. Retrieved 10 October 2008 from
16. Gross, S., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Haddock, G., Rothman, A., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771-782.
19. Human Rights Watch. (March, 2007). Poland: School censorship proposal threatens basic rights. Retrieved 11 April 2007 from
20. Krosnick, J., Boninger, D., Chuang, Y., Berent, M., & Carnot, C. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1132-1151.
21. Lavine, H., Huff, J. W., Wagner, S. H., & Sweeney, D. (1998). The moderating influence of attitude strength on the susceptibility to context effects in attitude surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 359-373.
22. Lord, C., Ross, M., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 2098-2109.
23. Marcus, G., Neuman, W., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. McHoskey, J. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 395-409.
25. Meffert, M., Chung, S., Joiner, A., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign, Journal of Communication, 56, 27-51.
26. Miller, A., McHoskey, J., Bane, C., & Dowd, T. (1993). The attitude polarization phenomenon-role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 561-574.
27. Miller, J., & Peterson, D. (2004). Theoretical and empirical implications of attitude strength. The Journal of Politics, 66, 847-867.
28. Moy, P., Domke, D., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 7-25.
29. Munro, G., & Ditto, P. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 636-653.
30. Munro, G., Ditto, P., Lockhart, L., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M., & Peterson, E. (2002). Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. presidential debate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 15-26.
31. Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126.
32. Mutz, D. C. (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 521-38.
33. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
34. Prislin, R. (1996). Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 447-477.
35. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1994). Attitude importance as a function of repeated attitude expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 39-51.
36. Scheufele, D., & Eveland, W. (2001). Perceptions of "public opinion" and "public" opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25-44.
37. Sherif, C., Kelly, M., Rodgers, H., Jr., Sarup, G., & Tittler, B. (1973). Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 311-328.
38. Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769.
39. Ulbig, S., & Funk, C. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21, 265-82.
40. Visser, P., Bizer, G., & Krosnick, J. (2006). Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (pp. 1-67). San Diego: Academic Press.
41. Visser, P., Krosnick, J., & Norris, C. (2004). Challenging the common-factor model of strength-related attitude attributes: Contrasting the antecedents and consequences of attitude importance and attitude-relevant knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Visser, P., Krosnick, J., & Simmons, J. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 118-141.
43. Wojcieszak, M. (2011a). Deliberation and attitude polarization: What happens when people with extreme views encounter disagreement. Journal of Communication, 61, 596-617.
44. Wojcieszak, M. (2011b). Pulling towards or pulling away: Deliberation, disagreement and opinion extremity in political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 207-225.
45. Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2009). What underlies the false consensus effect? How personal opinion and disagreement affect public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21, 25-46.
46. Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the divide or intensifying the conflict? How disagreement affects strong predilections about sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 31, 330-351.
47. Zuwerink, J., & Devine, P. (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.