|
Volumn 335, Issue 6076, 2012, Pages 1576-1577
|
To protect human subjects, review what was done, not proposed
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
HUMAN EVOLUTION;
LITERATURE REVIEW;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
REVIEW;
UNITED STATES;
ARTICLE;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESEARCH ETHICS;
STANDARD;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
ETHICS, RESEARCH;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;
|
EID: 84859140135
PISSN: 00368075
EISSN: 10959203
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1126/science.1217225 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (24)
|