Comparison of a Web-Based versus Traditional Diet Recall among Children

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 527-532

  Baranowski, Tom ^a   Islam, Noemi ^a   Baranowski, Janice ^a   Martin, Shelby ^a   Beltran, Alicia ^a   Dadabhoy, Hafza ^a   Adame, Su heyla ^a   Watson, Kathleen B ^a   Thompson, Debbe ^a   Cullen, Karen W ^b   Subar, Amy F ^c  

^a US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA/ARS)   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

24 hour recall; Children; Computer; Diet assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSUMER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIET; DIETETICS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIET SURVEYS; DIETETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84859100688     PISSN: 22122672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schatzkin A., Kipnis V. Could exposure assessment problems give us wrong answers to nutrition and cancer questions?. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96(21):1564-1565.
2. De Moor C., Baranowski T., Cullen K.W., Nicklas T. Misclassification associated with measurement error in the assessment of dietary intake. Public Health Nutr 2003, 6(4):393-399.
3. Baranowski T., Mendlein J., Resnicow K., et al. Physical Activity and Nutrition (PAN) in children and youth: Behavior, genes, and tracking in obesity prevention. Prev Med 2000, 31(2):S1-S10.
4. Thompson F., Subar A. Dietary assessment methodology, Chapter 1. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease 2008, 3-39. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. (second edition). A. Coulston, C. Boushey (Eds.).
5. McPherson R.S., Hoelscher D.M., Alexander M., Scanlon K.S., Serdula M.K. Dietary assessment methods among school-aged children: Validity and reliability. Prev Med 2000, 31(2):S11-S33.
6. Dodd K.W., Guenther P.M., Freedman L.S., et al. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: A review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106(10):1640-1650.
7. Baranowski T., Islam N., Baranowski J., et al. The Food Intake Recording Software System is valid among 4th grade children. J Am Diet Assoc 2002, 102(3):380-385.
8. Baranowski T., Domel S.B. A cognitive model of children's reporting of food intake. Am J Clin Nutr 1994, 59(1 suppl):212S-217S.
9. Beltran A., Knight Sepulveda K., Watson K., et al. Diverse food items are similarly categorized by 8- to 13-year-old children. J Nutr Educ Behav 2008, 40(3):149-159.
10. Beltran A., Knight Sepulveda K., Watson K., et al. Mixed foods are similarly categorized by 8-13 year old children. Appetite 2008, 50(2-3):316-324.
11. Beltran A., Knight Sepulveda K., Watson K., et al. Grains are similarly categorized by 8- to 13-year-old children. J Am Diet Assoc 2008, 108(11):1921-1926.
12. Sepulveda K.K., Beltran A., Watson K., et al. Fruit and vegetables are similarly categorised by 8-13-year-old children. Public Health Nutr 2009, 12(2):175-187.
13. Baranowski T., Beltran A., Martin S., et al. Tests of the accuracy and speed of categorizing foods into child vs professional categories using two methods of browsing with children. J Am Diet Assoc 2010, 110(1):91-94.
14. Baranowski T., Baranowski J., Watson K., et al. Children's accuracy of portion size estimation using digital food images: effects of interface design and size of image on computer screen. Public Health Nutr 2010, 15:1-8.
15. Subar A.F., Thompson F.E., Potischman N., et al. Formative research of a quick list for an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall. J Am Diet Assoc 2007, 107(6):1002-1007.
16. Subar A.F., Crafts J., Zimmerman T.P., et al. Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall. J Am Diet Assoc 2010, 110(1):55-64.
17. Zimmerman T.P., Hull S.G., Mc Nutt S., et al. Challenges in converting an interviewer-administered food probe database to self-administration in the National Cancer Institute Automated Self-administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24). J Food Compost Anal 2009, 22(suppl 1):S48-S51.
18. Blanton C.A., Moshfegh A.J., Baer D.J., Kretsch M.J. The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake. J Nutr 2006, 136(10):2594-2599.
19. Feskanich D., Sielaff B.H., Chong K., Buzzard I.M. Computerized collection and analysis of dietary intake information. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1989, 30(1):47-57.
20. Cullen K.W., Watson K., Himes J.H., et al. Evaluation of quality control procedures for 24-hour dietary recalls: Results for the Girls health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS). Prev Med 2004, 38(suppl):S14-S23.
21. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol 2006, 3:77-101.
22. Baxter S.D., Smith A.F., Nichols M.D., Guinn C.H., Hardin J.W. Children's dietary reporting accuracy over multiple 24-hour recalls varies by body mass index category. Nutr Res 2006, 26(6):241-248.
23. Baxter S.D., Hardin J.W., Guinn C.H., et al. Fourth-grade children's dietary recall accuracy is influenced by retention interval (target period and interview time). J Am Diet Assoc 2009, 109(5):846-856.
24. Burrows T.L., Martin R.J., Collins C.E. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc 2010, 110(10):1501-1510.