How Item Writers Understand Depth of Knowledge

Educational Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 185-206

  Wyse, Adam E ^a   Viger, Steven G ^a  

^a Office of Psychometrics Assessment Research and Accountability   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859094407     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2011.634286     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Achieve. 2006. How does the Hawaii high school assessment measure up? Retrieved from http://www.achieve.org/files/HI-exitexam.pdf
2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. and Bloom, B. S. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives New York, NY: Longman.
3. Bhola, D. S., Impara, J. C. and Buckendahl, C. W. 2003. Aligning tests with states' content standards: Methods and issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22: 21-29.
4. Bloom, B. S. and Krathwohl, D. R. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
5. Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., Nagle, K., Sanford, C., Blackorby, J., Sinclair, B. and Riley, D. 2009. National profile on alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. A report from the National Study on Alternate Assessments (NCSER 2009-3014) Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
6. Council of Chief State School Officers. 2009. Models Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Projects/alignment_analysis/models/418.cfm
7. Fisher, R. A. 1935. The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 98: 39-54.
8. Flowers, C., Wakeman, S. and Browder, D. 2009. Links for academic learning (LAL): A conceptual model for investigating alignment of alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28: 25-37.
9. Hein, S. F. and Skaggs, G. E. 2009. A qualitative investigation of panelists' experiences of standard setting using two variations of the bookmark procedure. Applied Measurement in Education, 22: 207-228.
10. La Marca, P., Redfield, D., Winter, P., Bailey, A. and Despriet, L. H. 2000. State standards and state assessment systems: A guide to alignment Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
11. Martone, A. and Sireci, S. G. 2009. Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Education Research, 79: 1332-1361.
12. Mislevy, R. J. and Haertel, G. 2006. Implications for evidence-centered deisgn for educational assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25: 6-20.
13. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S. and Almond, R. G. 2003. On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1: 3-67.
14. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., Almond, R. G. and Lukas, J. F. 2006. "Concepts, terminology, and basic models of evidence-centered design.". In Automated scoring of complex tasks in computer-based testing Edited by: Williamson, D. M., Bejar, I. I. and Mislevy, R. J. 15-47. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Porter, A. C. 2002. Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31: 7-14.
16. Porter, A. C. and Smithson, J. 2001. New tools for analyzing teaching, curriculum, and standards in mathematics & science. Results from survey of enacted curriculum project Madison: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
17. Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., Blank, R. and Zeidner, T. 2007. Alignment as a teacher variable. Applied Measurement in Education, 20: 27-51.
18. Steinberg, L. S., Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Baird, A. B., Cahallan, C., Di Bello, L. V. and Kindfield, A. C. H. 2003. Introduction to the Biomass project: An illustration of evidence-centered assessment design and delivery capability (CRESST Technical Report 609) Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, CRESST, UCLA.
19. Webb, N. L. 1997. Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science (Council of Chief State School Officers and National Institute for Science Education Research Monograph No. 6) Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
20. Webb, N. L. 2007. Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20: 7-25.
21. Webb, N. L. June 2008a. Alignment analysis of extended reading standards and assessments (Final report) June, Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
22. Webb, N. L. June 2008b. Alignment analysis of extended science grade band standards and alternate assessments (Final report) June, Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
23. Webb, N. L. June 2008c. Alignment analysis of mathematics extended grade band standards and assessments (Final report) June, Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
24. Webb, N. M., Herman, J. L. and Webb, N. L. 2008. Alignment of mathematics state-level standards and assessments: The role of reviewer agreement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26: 17-29.