Student performance on and attitudes toward peer assessments on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience assignments

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 113-121

  Rubin, Rochelle F ^a,b   Turner, Traci ^a,b  

^a MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Dreyer Medical Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer assessment; Rough draft; Students attitudes

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADVANCED PHARMACY PRACTICE EXPERIENCE; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; LEARNING; PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; PHARMACY STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

EID: 84859077474     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2012.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Langan A.M., Shuker D.M., Cullen W.R., et al. Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assess Eval Higher Educ 2008, 33:179-190.
2. Falchikov N., Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res 2000, 70:287-322.
3. Vu T.T., Dall'Alba G. Students' experience of peer assessment in a professional course. Assess Eval Higher Educ 2007, 32:541-556.
4. Sitthiworachart J., Joy M. Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming Class. J Comput Assist Learn 2008, 24:217-231.
5. Pare D.E., Joordens S. Peering into large lectures: Examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an Online peer assessment Tool. J Comput Assist Learn 2008, 24:526-540.
6. Sahin S. An application of peer assessment in higher education. TOJET 2008, 7. Article 1.
7. Papinczak T., Young L., Groves M. Peer assessment in problem-based learning: A qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007, 12:169-186.
8. Krause J., Popovich N.G. A group interaction peer/self assessment process in a pharmacy practice course. Am J Pharm Educ 1996, 60:136-145.
9. Bryan R.E., Krych A.J., Carmichael S.W., et al. Assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005, 34:486-491.
10. Archer J., Norcini J., Southgate L., et al. Mini-PAT (peer assessment Tool): A valid Component of aNational Assessment Programme in the UK?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008, 13:181-192.
11. Sargeant J., Mann K., van der Vleuten C., et al. "Directed" self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28:47-54.