Signed directed graph based modeling and its validation from process knowledge and process data

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 41-53

  Yang, Fan ^a,b   Shah, Sirish ^a   Xiao, Deyun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

fault diagnosis; process hazard assessment; process topology; signed directed graph; transfer entropy

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS-CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GRAPHICAL MODEL; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL PROCESSS; INFORMATION TRANSFERS; INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS; PROCESS DATA; PROCESS HAZARD ASSESSMENT; PROCESS KNOWLEDGE; PROCESS TOPOLOGY; PROCESS VARIABLES; REACHABILITY; ROOT CAUSE; SIGNED DIRECTED GRAPH; TRANSFER ENTROPY; VALIDATION METHODS;

ENTROPY; FAILURE ANALYSIS; TOPOLOGY;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84859033104     PISSN: 1641876X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0003-z     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alonso, C. J., Llamas, C., Maestro, J. A. and Pulido, B. (2003). Diagnosis of dynamic systems: A knowledge model that allows tracking the system during the diagnosis process, in P. W. H. Chung, C. Hinde and M. Ali (Eds.), Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2718, Springer, Berlin, pp. 208-218. (Pubitemid 36892314)
2. Bauer, M., Cox, J. W., Caveness, M. H., Downs, J. J. and Thornhill, N. F. (2007). Finding the direction of disturbance propagation in a chemical process using transfer entropy, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 15 (1): 12-21. (Pubitemid 46056096)
3. Bauer, M. and Thornhill, N. F. (2008). A practical method for identifying the propagation path of plant-wide disturbances, Journal of Process Control 18 (7-8): 707-719.
4. Cheng, H., Tikkala, V.-M., Zakharov, A., Myller, T. and Jamsa-Jounela, S. L. (2011). Application of the enhanced dynamic causal digraph method on a three-layer board machine, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 19 (3): 644-655.
5. Fagarasan, I., Ploix, S. and Gentil, S. (2004). Causal fault detection and isolation based on a set-membership approach, Automatica 40 (12): 2099-2110.
6. Fedai, M. and Drath, R. (2005). CAEX-A neutral data exchange format for engineering data, Automation Technology in Practice-ATP International 1 (3): 43-51.
7. Gigi, S. and Tangirala, A. K. (2010). Quantitative analysis of directional strengths in jointly stationary linear multivariate processes, Biological Cybernetics 103 (2): 119-133.
8. Górny, B. (2001). Consistency-Based Reasoning in Model-Based Diagnosis, Ph.D. thesis, AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow.
9. Iri, M., Aoki, K., O'shima, E. and Matsuyama, H. (1979). An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process, Computers and Chemical Engineering 3 (1-4): 489-493.
10. Jan, A., Jonas, B., Erik, F., Krysander, M. and Lars, N. (2007). Safety analysis of autonomous systems by extended fault tree analysis, International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 21 (2-3): 287-298. (Pubitemid 46448635)
11. Ligza, A. (1996). A note on systematic conflict generation in CA-EN-type causal structures, LAAS Report No. 96317, Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems, Toulouse.
12. Ligza, A. and Kocielny, J. M. (2008). A new approach to multiple fault diagnosis: A combination of diagnostic matrices, graphs, algebraic and rule-based models. The case of two-layer models, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 18 (4): 465-476, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-008-0041-8.
13. Korbicz, J. and Kocielny, J. M. (Eds.) (2010). Modeling, Diagnostics and Process Control: Implementation in the Dia-Ster System, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
14. Leyval, L., Gentil, S. and Feray-Beaumont, S. (1994). Model-based causal reasoning for process supervision, Automatica 30 (8): 1295-1306. (Pubitemid 124008291)
15. Li, Q. and Racine, J. S. (2007). Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Lungarella, M., Ishiguro, K., Kuniyoshi, Y. and Otsu, N. (2007). Methods for quantifying the causal structure of bivariate time series, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 17 (3): 903-921. (Pubitemid 46782057)
17. Maurya, M. R., Rengaswamy, R. and Venkatasubramanian, V. (2003a). A systematic framework for the development and analysis of signed digraphs for chemical processes: 1. Algorithms and analysis, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (20): 4789-4810. (Pubitemid 37204137)
18. Maurya, M. R., Rengaswamy, R. and Venkatasubramanian, V. (2003b). A systematic framework for the development and analysis of signed digraphs for chemical processes: 2. Control loops and flowsheet analysis, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (20): 4811-4827. (Pubitemid 37204138)
19. Maurya, M. R., Rengaswamy, R. and Venkatasubramanian, V. (2004). Application of signed digraphs-based analysis for fault diagnosis of chemical process flowsheets, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17 (5): 501-518.
20. Montmain, J. and Gentil, S. (2000). Dynamic causal model diagnostic reasoning for online technical process supervision, Automatica 36 (8): 1137-1152.
21. Mosterman, P. J. and Biswas, G. (1999). Diagnosis of continuous valued systems in transient operating regions, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part A 29 (6): 554-565.
22. Oyeleye, O. O. and Kramer, M. A. (1988). Qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: Steady-state analysis, AIChE Journal 34 (9): 1441-1454.
23. Palmer, C. and Chung, P. W. H. (1999). Verifying signed directed graph models for process plants, Computers & Chemical Engineering 23 (Suppl. 1): S394-S391.
24. Palmer, C. and Chung, P. W. H. (2000). Creating signed directed graph models for process plants, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 39 (20): 2548-2558. (Pubitemid 30460573)
25. Pastor, J., Lafon, M., Trave-Massuyes, L., Demonet, J.-F., Doyon, B. and Celsis, P. (2000). Information processing in large-scale cerebral networks: The causal connectivity approach, Biological Cybernetics 82 (1): 49-59.
26. Schreiber, T. (2000). Measuring information transfer, Physical Review Letters 85 (2): 461-464.
27. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London/New York, NY.
28. Staroswiecki, M. (2000). Quantitative and qualitative models for fault detection and isolation, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 14 (3): 301-325.
29. Tangirala, A. K., Shah, S. L. and Thornhill, N. F. (2005). PSC-MAP: A new tool for plant-wide oscillation detection, Journal of Process Control 15 (8): 931-941. (Pubitemid 40999991)
30. Thambirajah, J., Benabbas, L., Bauer, M. and Thornhill, N. F. (2009). Cause-and-effect analysis in chemical processes utilizing XML: Plant connectivity and quantitative process history, Computers and Chemical Engineering 33 (2): 503-512.
31. Yang, F., Shah, S. L. and Xiao, D. (2010a). SDG (Signed Directed Graph) based process description and fault propagation analysis for a tailings pumping process, Proceedings of the 13th IFAC Symposium on Automation in Mining, Mineral and Metal Processing, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 50-55.
32. Yang, F., Xiao, D. and Shah, S. L. (2010b). Qualitative fault detection and hazard analysis based on signed directed graphs for large-scale complex systems, in W. Zhang (Ed.), Fault Detection, IN-TECH, Vukovar, pp. 15-50.
33. Yim, S. Y., Ananthakumar, H. G., Benabbas, L., Horch, A., Drath, R. and Thornhill, N. F. (2006). Using process topology in plant-wide control loop performance assessment, Computers and Chemical Engineering 31 (2): 86-99. (Pubitemid 44711910)