A systematic framework for the development and analysis of signed digraphs for chemical processes. 1. Algorithms and analysis

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 20, 2003, Pages 4789-4810

  Maurya, Mano Ram ^a   Rengaswamy, Raghunathan ^b   Venkatasubramanian, Venkat ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Clarkson University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ALGORITHMS; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

FAULT DIAGNOSIS;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY;

FAULT DETECTION; SAFETY;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; ERROR; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SAFETY;

EID: 0141566573     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie020644a     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Rich, S. H.; Venkatasubramanian, V. Model-based reasoning in diagnostic expert systems for chemical process plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1987, 11, 111-122.
2. Finch, F. Automated fault diagnosis of chemical process plants using model-based reasoning. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1989.
3. Wilcox, N.; Himmelblau, D. The possible cause-effect graphs (PSEG) model for fault diagnosis-I. Methodology. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18 (2), 103-116.
4. Wilcox, N.; Himmelblau, D. The possible cause-effect graphs (PSEG) model for fault diagnosis-II. Applications. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18 (2), 117-127.
5. Venkatasubramanian, V.; Vaidhyanathan, R. A knowledge based framework for automating hazop analysis. AIChE J. 1994, 40 (3), 497-505.
6. Venkatasubramanian, V.; Rengaswamy, R.; Kavuri, S. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27 (3), 313-326.
7. Iri, M.; Aoki, K.; O'Shima, E.; Matsuyama, H. An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1979, 3 (1-4), 489-493.
8. Umeda, T.; Kuriyama, T.; O'Shima, E.; Matsuyama, H. A graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1980, 35 (12), 2379-2388.
9. Shiozaki, J.; Matsuyama, H.; O'Shima, E.; Iri, M. An improved algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1985, 9 (3), 285-293.
10. Tsuge, Y.; Shiozaki, J.; Matsuyama, H.; O'Shima, E. Fault diagnosis algorithms based on signed directed graphs and its modifications. Ind. Chem. Eng., Symp. Ser. 1985, 92, 133.
11. Kokawa, M.; Shigai, S. Failure propagating simulation and nonfailure paths search in network systems. Automatica 1982, 18, 335.
12. Kokawa, M.; Satoshi, M.; Shigai, S. Fault location using digraph and inverse direction search with application. Automatica 1983, 19 (6), 729-735.
13. Kramer, M.; Palowitch, B. Rule-based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. AIChE J. 1987, 33 (7), 1067-1078.
14. Oyeleye, O.; Kramer, M. Qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: Steady-state analysis. AIChE J. 1988, 34 (9), 1441-1454.
15. Chang, C.; Yu, C. On-line fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1990, 29 (7), 1290-1299.
16. Vaidhyanathan, R.; Venkatasubramanian, V. Digraph-based models for automated hazop analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 1995, 50 (1), 33-49.
17. Mylaraswamy, D.; Kavuri, S.; Venkatasubramanian, V. A framework for automated development of causal models for fault diagnosis. AIChE Annual Meeting 232g, Miami, 1994.
18. Bhushan, M.; Rengaswamy, R. Design of sensor location based on various fault diagnostic observability and reliability criteria. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 735-741.
19. Raghuraj, R.; Bhushan, M.; Rengaswamy, R. Location of sensors in complex chemical plants based on fault diagnostic observability criteria. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 310-322.
20. Bhushan, M.; Rengaswamy, R. Design of sensor network based on the signed directed graph of the process for efficient fault diagnosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000b, 39, 999-1019.
21. Bhushan, M.; Rengaswamy, R. Comprehensive design of a sensor network for chemical plants based on various diagnosability and reliability criteria: 1. Framework. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41 (7), 1826-1839.
22. Bhushan, M.; Rengaswamy, R. Comprehensive design of a sensor network for chemical plants based on various diagnosability and reliability criteria: 2. Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41 (7), 1840-1860.
23. Palmer, C.; Chung, P. Creating signed directed graph models for process plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 2548-2558.
24. Chen, J.; Howell, J. A self-validating control system based approach to plant fault detection and diagnosis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25, 337-358.
25. Mah, R. Chemical Process Structures and Information Flows; Butterworth Publishers: Boston, 1990.
26. Oyeleye, O.; Finch, F.; Kramer, M. Qualitative modeling and fault diagnosis of processes by MIDAS; Technical Report LIPSE-89-061; Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT: Cambridge, MA, 1989.
27. Newell, R.; Fisher, D. Model development, reduction, and experimental evaluation for an evaporator. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1972, 11 (2), 213-221.
28. Hall, P. On representatives of subsets. J. London Math. Soc. 1935, 10, 26-30.
29. Oyeleye, O.; Kramer, M. Supplementary Material to qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: Steady-state analysis; Technical Report LIPSE-88-036; Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT: Cambridge, MA, 1988.
30. Basset, L.; Maybee, J.; Quirk, J. Qualitative economics and the scope of the correspondence principle. Econometrica 1968, 36 (3/4), 544-563.
31. Kuipers, B. Qualitative simulation. Artif Intell. 1986, 29 (3), 289-338.
32. Williams, B. C. Doing time: putting qualitative reasoning on firmer ground. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, AAAI 86; Philadelphia, PA, Aug 11-15, 1986; Vol. 1, pp 105-112.
33. Sacks, E. Qualitative analysis of piecewise linear approximation. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Eng. 1988, 3 (3), 151-155.
34. Struss, P. Global filters for qualitative behaviors. Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, AAAI 88; Saint Paul, MN, Aug 21-26, 1988; pp 275-280.
35. Kuipers, B.; Chiu, C.; Molle, D. T.; Throop, D. Higher-order derivative constraints in qualitative simulation. Artif Intell. 1991, 51, 343-379.
36. Shen, Q.; Leitch, R. R. Combining qualitative simulation and fuzzy sets. In Recent advances in qualitative physics; Faltings, B., Struss, P., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992; pp 83-100.
37. Faltings, B., Struss, P., Eds. Recent advances in qualitative physics; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992.
38. Bonarini, A.; Bontempi, G. A qualitative simulation approach for fuzzy dynamic models. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simul. 1994, 4 (4), 285-313.
39. Heller, U.; Struss, P. Transformation of qualitative dynamic models-Application in hydroecology. 10th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (QR-96), MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA, May 21-24, 1996; pp 83-92.
40. Berleant, D.; Kuipers, B. Qualitative and quantitative simulation: Bridging the gap. Artif. Intell. 1997, 95 (2), 215-255.
41. Clancy, D. J. Solving complexity and ambiguity problems in qualitative simulation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1997.
42. Keller, U.; Wyatt, T. K.; Leitch, R. R. FRenSi: A fuzzy qualitative simulation method. Workshop on Applications of Interval Analysis to Systems and Control (with special emphasis on recent advances in Modal Interval Analysis), Vehí, J., Sainz, M. A., Eds.; University of Girona Press: Girona, Spain, 1999; pp 305-313.
43. Kay, H.; Rinner, B.; Kuipers, B. J. Semi-quantitative system identification. Artif Intell. 2000, 119 (1-2), 103-140.