Improved modeling of out-of-vocabulary words using morphologicalclasses

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 524-528

  Müller, Thomas ^a   Schütze, Hinrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASS-BASED LANGUAGE MODEL; LABELED DATA; MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES; OUT-OF-VOCABULARY WORDS; STATE OF THE ART;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84859020514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Lalit R. Bahl, Peter F. Brown, Peter V. de Souza, Robert L. Mercer, and David Nahamoo. 1991. A fast algorithm for deleted interpolation. In Speech Communication and Technology, pages 1209-1212.
2. Andre Berton, Pablo Fetter, and Peter Regel-Brietzmann. 1996. Compound words in large-vocabulary German speech recognition systems. In Spoken Language, volume 2, pages 1165 -1168 vol.2, October.
3. Jeff A. Bilmes and Katrin Kirchhoff. 2003. Factored language models and generalized parallel backoff. In Human Language Technology, NAACL '03, pages 4-6. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Peter F. Brown, Peter V. de Souza, Robert L.Mercer, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Jenifer C. Lai. 1992. Classbased n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18:467-479, December.
5. Mathias Creutz, Teemu Hirsimäki, Mikko Kurimo, Antti Puurula, Janne Pylkkönen, Vesa Siivola, Matti Varjokallio, Ebru Arisoy, Murat Saraçlar, and Andreas Stolcke. 2007. Morph-based speech recognition and modeling of out-of-vocabulary words across languages. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 5:3:1-3:29, December.
6. Samarth Keshava. 2006. A simpler, intuitive approach to morpheme induction. In PASCAL Challenge Workshop on Unsupervised Segmentation of Words into Morphemes, pages 31-35.
7. Giulio Maltese and Federico Mancini. 1992. An automatic technique to include grammatical and morphological information in a trigram-based statistical language model. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 157 -160 vol.1, March.
8. Thomas R. Niesler, Edward W.D. Whittaker, and Philip C. Woodland. 1998. Comparison of part-of-speech and automatically derived category-based language models for speech recognition. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 177 -180 vol.1, May.
9. Helmut Schmid. 1994. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In New Methods in Language Processing, pages 44-49.
10. Michael Steinbach, George Karypis, and Vipin Kumar. 2000. A comparison of document clustering techniques. In KDD Workshop on Text Mining.
11. Dimitra Vergyri, Katrin Kirchhoff, Kevin Duh, and Andreas Stolcke. 2004. Morphology-based language modeling for Arabic speech recognition. In Spoken Language Processing, pages 2245-2248.
12. Deniz Yuret and Ergun Biçici. 2009. Modeling morphologically rich languages using split words and unstructured dependencies. In International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 345-348. Association for Computational Linguistics.