Mode of delivery: Toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 913-918

  Little, Margaret Olivia ^a   Lyerly, Anne Drapkin ^b   Mitchell, Lisa M ^b   Armstrong, Elizabeth M ^b   Harris, Lisa H ^b   Kukla, Rebecca ^b   Kuppermann, Miriam ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; NOTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TWINS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 55449125554     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181888fd8     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:203-12.
2. Roberts RG, Deutchman M, King VJ, Fryer GE, Miyoshi TJ. Changing policies on vaginal birth after cesarean: impact on access. Birth 2007;34: 316-22.
3. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:946-50.
4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1-103.
5. Cruikshank DP. Intrapartum management of twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1167-76.
6. Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. BJOG 2005;112:1139-44.
7. Hogle KL, Hutton EK, McBrien KA, Barrett JF, Hannah ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:220-7.
8. Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 56. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:869-83.
9. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83.
10. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 265. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1189-90.
11. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:235-7.
12. Chinnock M, Robson S. Obstetric trainees' experience in vaginal breech delivery: implications for future practice. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:900-3.
13. Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, Spong CY, Portnoy B, DeVoto E, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetricians-gynecologists' knowledge, perception and practice. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:57-66.
14. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107: 1386-97.
15. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. Obstet Gynecol American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007; 110:1501-4.
16. Wen SW, Fung Kee Fung K, Oppen-heimer L, Demissie K, Yang Q, Walker M. Neonatal morbidity in second twin according to gestational age at birth and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:773-7.
17. Lagrew DC, Bush MC, McKeown AM, Lagrew NG. Emergent (crash) cesarean delivery: indications and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1638-43.
18. Mankuta DD, Leshno MM, Menasche MM, Brezis MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:714-9.
19. Murphy PA, Fullerton JT. Development of the Optimality Index as a new approach to evaluating outcomes of maternity care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006;35:770-8.
20. Béhague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 2002; 324:942-5.