Relationships between national-park affinity and attitudes towards protected area management of visitors to the Gesaeuse National Park, Austria

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 19, Issue , 2012, Pages 48-55

  Arnberger, Arne ^a   Eder, Renate ^a   Allex, Brigitte ^a   Sterl, Petra ^b   Burns, Robert C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b Gesaeuse National Park   (Austria)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Austria; National park affinity; Protected area management; Tourism; Visitor survey

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDES; AUSTRIA; NATIONAL PARKS; PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT; TOURISM;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; REGIONAL PLANNING;

CONSERVATION;

EID: 84859003014     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arnberger A., Brandenburg C. Besuchermonitoring im Nationalpark Donau-Auen, Niederösterreichischer Anteil 2002, Institut für Freiraumgestaltung und Landschaftspflege, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.
2. Arnberger A., Brandenburg C. Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environ. Manage. 2007, 40:34-45.
3. Arnberger A., Aikoh T., Eder R., Shoji Y., Mieno T. How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments. Urban For. Urban Green 2010, 9:215-225.
4. Beh A., Bruyere B.L. Segmentation by visitor motivation in three Kenyan national reserves. Tourism Manage. 2007, 28:1464-1471.
5. Boo E. Ecotourism: The Potentials and Pitfalls 1990, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC.
6. Buijs A.E. Lay People's Images of Nature: Comprehensive frameworks of values, beliefs, and value orientations. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2009, 22:417-432.
7. Burns R.C., Arnberger A., von Ruschkowski E. Social carrying capacity challenges in parks, forests, and protected areas: an examination of transatlantic methodologies and practices. Intern. J. Sociol. 2010, 40(3):30-50.
8. Eagles P., McCool S.F. Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas - Planning and Management 2002, CABI Publishing, New York.
9. Elands, B., van Marwijk, R., 2011. Introduction. Forest, Policy Econ. (this issue).
10. fact.um Angriff auf Nationalparkidee. fact.um. Z. Umweltdachverbandes 2008, 01/2008, 3.
11. Galloway G. Psychographic segmentation of park visitor markets: evidence for the utility of sensation seeking. Tourism Manage. 2002, 23:581-596.
12. Gross U. Nationalpark Gesaeuse: mühsame Aufholjagd 2009, Kleine Zeitung, 30.10.2009.
13. Huemer C. Viele Wünsche an den Nationalpark Gesaeuse 2007, Kleine Zeitung, 19.12.2007.
14. Huemer C. Vertrag für ein Jahr verlängert 2007, Kleine Zeitung, 17.12.2007.
15. Hunziker M. Totholz in den Nationalparkwäldern: Attraktion oder Störfaktor. Cratschla 1997, 2:2-8.
16. Hvenegaard G.T., Dearden P. Ecotourism versus tourism in a Thai national park. Ann. Tourism Res. 1998, 25(3):700-720.
17. IUCN Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories 1994, IUCN, Gland, CH.
18. Job H. Estimating the regional economic impact of tourism to national parks. Gaia 2008, 17(S1):134-142.
19. Job H., Harrer B., Metzler D., Hajizadeh-Alamdary D. Ökonomische Effekte von Großschutzgebieten, BfN-Skripten 135 2005, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn.
20. Job H., Mayer M., Woltering M., Müller M., Harrer B., Metzler D. Der Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald als regionaler Wirtschaftsfaktor (Kurzfassung), Berichte aus dem Nationalpark, Heft 4/2008 2008, Nationalpark Bayerische Wald, Grafenau.
21. Kals E., Schumacher D., Montada L. Emotional affinity toward nature as motivational basis to protect nature. Environ. Behav. 1999, 31(2):178-202.
22. Küpfer I. Die regionalwirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Nationalparktourismus - untersucht am Beispiel des Schweizerischen Nationalparks, Nationalpark-Forschung in der Schweiz, Nr. 90 2000, Geographisches Institut Universität Zürich, Zürich.
23. Leibenath M. Entwicklung von Nationalparkregionen durch Regionalmarketing: Untersucht am Beispiel der Müritzregion 2000, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
24. Liebecke R., Wagner K., Suda M. Die Akzeptanz des Nationalparks bei der lokalen Bevölkerung, Berichte aus dem Nationalpark Heft 3/2008 2008, Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Grafenau.
25. Lupp G., Konold W. Landscape preferences and perception of both residents and tourists: a case study in Müritz National Park (Germany). Series of the Institute for Landscape and Open Spaces 2008, 47-58. HSR University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil, Rapperswil. D. Siegrist, C. Clivaz, M. Hunziker, S. Iten (Eds.).
26. Machairas I., Hovardas T. Determining visitors' dispositions towards the designation of a Greek national park. Environ. Manage. 2005, 36(1):73-88.
27. Influencing Human Behavior - Theory and Applications in Recreation, Tourism, and Natural Resource Management 1992, Sagamore Publishing, Champaign, Illinois. M.J. Manfredo (Ed.).
28. Manning R. Studies in Outdoor Recreation 2011, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Third edition.
29. Mayer M., Woltering M. Angebotsseitige Analyse des Tourismus in der Nationalparkregion Bayerischer Wald. Die Destination Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald als regionaler Wirtschaftsfaktor 2008, 66-99. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Grafenau. H. Job (Ed.).
30. Mayer M., Müller M., Woltering M., Arnegger J., Job H. The economic impact of tourism in six German national parks. Landscape Urban Plan. 2010, 97(2):73-82.
31. Mose I., Weixlbaumer N. A new paradigma for protected areas in Europe?. Protected Areas and Regional Development in Europe. Towards a New Model for the 21st Century 2007, 3-19. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK. I. Mose (Ed.).
32. Müller M., Job H. Managing natural disturbance in protected areas: tourists' attitudes towards the bark beetle in a German national park. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:375-383.
33. Nationalparks Austria, s.a. Nationalparks Austria. [accessed on 02.12.2010]. http://www.nationalparks.at.
34. Newsome D., Moore S.A., Dowling R.K. Natural Area Tourism: Ecology Impacts and Management 2002, Channel View Publications, Clevedon.
35. Obua J., Harding D.M. Visitor characteristics and attitudes towards Kibale National Park, Uganda. Tourism Manage. 1996, 17(7):495-505.
36. Papageorgiou K. A combined park management framework based on regulatory and behavioral strategies: use of visitors' knowledge to assess electiveness. Environ. Manage. 2001, 28(1):61-73.
37. Racevskis L.A., Lupi F. Comparing urban and rural perceptions of and familiarity with the management of forest ecosystems. Soc. Nat. Res. 2006, 19(6):479-495.
38. Rentsch G. Die Akzeptanz eines Schutzgebietes: untersucht am Beispiel der Einstellung der lokalen Bevölkerung zum Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald. Münchener Geographische Hefte, Nr. 57 1988, Verlag Michael Laßleben, Kallmünz/Regensburg.
39. Ryan C., Sterling L. Visitors to Litchfield National Park, Australia: a typology based on behaviours. J. Sustain. Tourism 2001, 9(1):61-75.
40. Schaal P. Synthese der Fallbeispiele: Zukunftsperspektiven der Schutzgebietsplanung. Wahrnehmungsgeografische Studien Band 2009, 25:199-214. BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg. I. Mose (Ed.).
41. Sterl P., Brandenburg C., Arnberger A. Visitors' awareness and assessment of recreational disturbance of wildlife in the Donau-Auen National Park. J. Nat. Conserv. 2008, 16:135-145.
42. Sterl P., Eder R., Arnberger A. Exploring factors influencing the attitude of ski tourers towards the ski touring management measures of the Gesaeuse National Park. eco.mont 2010, 2(1):31-38.
43. Stoll-Kleemann S. Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. J. Environ. Psychol. 2001, 21:369-385.
44. Stynes D.J. Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: Joshua Tree National Park, 2004 2006, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
45. Stynes D.J. Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: Yosemite National Park, 2005 2007, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
46. Stynes D.J., Sun Y.-Y. Economic Impacts of Grand Canyon National Park Visitor Spending on the Local Economy, 2003 2005, Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
47. Tomićević J., Shannon M.A., Milovanović M. Socio-economic impacts on the attitudes towards conservation of natural resources: case study from Serbia. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12:157-162.
48. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P. A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Soc. Nat. Res. 1999, 12:523-537.
49. von Ruschkowski E. Ursachen und Lösungsansätze für Akzeptanzprobleme von Großschutzgebieten am Beispiel von zwei Fallstudien im Nationalpark Harz und im Yosemite National Park 2010, ibidem-Verlag, Hannover/Stuttgart.
50. Wall Reinius S., Fredman P. Protected areas as attractions. Ann. Tourism Res. 2007, 34(4):839-854.
51. Weaver D.B. Hard-core ecotourists in Lamington National Park, Australia. J. Ecotourism 2002, 1(1):19-35.
52. Zechner, L., 2007. Visitor Management in the Gesaeuse National Park. A Mixed Method Approach Including a Checklist. Thesis at the University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt.