Knowledge in health technology assessment: Who, what, how?

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 324-329

  Tjørnhøj Thomsen, Tine ^a   Hansen, Helle Ploug ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Health technology assessment; Knowledge production; Patient aspects; Patient education

Indexed keywords

HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SYSTEMS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; PATIENT ASPECTS; PATIENT EDUCATION; SCIENTIFIC METHOD;

HEALTH CARE;

HEALTH;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; PATIENT EDUCATION;

DENMARK; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84858988665     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462311000511     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barth F. An anthropology of knowledge. Curr Anthropol. 2002;43:1-18. (Pubitemid 44277182)
2. Bates MJ. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for online search interface. Online Rev. 1989;13:407-424.
3. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge; 1989.
4. Bridges J, Jones C. Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:30-35. (Pubitemid 46648297)
5. Coulter A. Perspectives on health technology assessment: Response from the patient's perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:92-96. (Pubitemid 38656968)
6. Dalton SO, Hansen HP, Johansen C, et al. Rehabilitation after breast cancer, colorectal cancer and prostate cancer? A health technology assessment. Copenhagen: National Board of Health, Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment; 2010;10.
7. Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health. Patient education: A health technology assessment. Copenhagen: National Board of Health, Monitoring & Health Technology Assessment; 2009;11.
8. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair liberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334-340.
9. Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta HD, et al. EUR-ASSESS project subgroup report on dissemination and impact.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:220-286. (Pubitemid 27214832)
10. Greer AL, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL, Wu ZH. Bringing the patient back in: Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:747-761. (Pubitemid 36125881)
11. Grøn L. Winds of change, bodies of persistence: Health promotion and lifestyle change in institutional and everyday contexts. Århus: University of Aarhus, Department of Anthropology and Ethnography; 2004.
12. Hansen HP, Draborg E, Kristensen FB. Exploring qualitative research syntheses: The role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision-making. Patient. 2011;4:143-152.
13. Hansen HP, Lee A, van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: A review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:330-336.
14. Hastrup K. Knowledge and evidence in anthropology. Anthropol Theory. 2004;4:445-472.
15. Hastrup K. Refleksion: Vidensbegreber og videnskab [Reflection: Knowledge concepts of and science] In: Hastrup K, ed. Viden om verden: En grundbog i antropologisk analyse [Knowledge about the world: A textbook in anthropological analyses]. København: Hans Reitzel; 2004:409-425.
16. HTAi homepage. http://www.htai.org/index.php?id=427 (accessed December 27, 2010).
17. Hølge-Hazelton B. Diabetes: En skole for livet [Diabetes: A school for life] København: Forskerskolen i Livslang Læring/ Samfundslitteratur; 2003.
18. Kristensen FB, Sigmund H, eds. Health technology assessment handbook. Denmark: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health; 2007.
19. Lee A, Skött LS, Hansen HP. Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: State of the art. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:530-536.
20. National Board of Health. http://www.sst.dk/English.aspx (accessed January 15, 2011).
21. National Board of Health. Brain injury? A health technology assessment. Copenhagen: National Board of Health, Danish Centre of Health Technology Assessment; 2011.
22. Rod MH. Forebyggelsens momenter: En antropologisk analyse af evidens og etik i tiltag rettet mod unges brug af alkohol. [The moments of preventive work. An anthropological analysis of evidence and ethics in initiatives directed towards young people's use of alcohol]. København: Institut for Antropologi; 2010:59.
23. Roepstorff A. Fem bud for en praktisk vidensantropologi [Five offers for a practical anthropology of knowledge] In: Hastrup K, ed. Viden om verden: En grundbog i antropologisk analyse [Knowledge about the world: A textbook in Anthropological analyses]. København: Hans Reitzel; 2004:364-383.
24. Roepstorff A. The Double Inter-Face of Environmental knowledge: Fishing for Greenland halibut. In: Neis B, Felt L, eds. Finding our sea-legs: Linking fishery people and their knowledge with science and management. St. Johns: ISER Books; 2000:156-188.
25. Storm I. Patientuddannelse i Danmark [Patient education in Denmark]. Sygeplejersken. 2010;18:64-66.